A rose by any other name would smell as sweet, Shakespeare’s character famously said. No question there. We can all agree on that, sweet Juliet.
How would Juliet’s naming logic apply to places? A place by any other name would certainly still exist. But, with a different name or multiple names, how could that place be readily identified? How could it be found?
Geographic names, the reference words we use for particular places, are among the most elementary and organic parts of language. Even a prehistoric man needed to use distinctive names to tell to his family and friends where he found berries or crossed the river. In modern societies, geographic names have many more uses and complexities.
Let’s have standards, please
As more and more people at greater and greater distances have a reason to refer to a particular place, the potential for confusion rises if that place has different names or the same name is used for different places. There have to be widely-accepted standards for the vast number of geographic names we have access to so that each name can be used reliably on maps and in official documents. Some authoritative organization has to set standards for the spelling and application of geographic names so they can be used consistently as commonly understood references in government, commerce, and everyday life.
Consider the alternative. Without systematic standards for geographic names, we wouldn’t be able to use them routinely in digital environments. We wouldn’t be able to find places in an instant on mobile devices and see their correct location on electronic maps.
The U.S. Board on Geographic Names (BGN) is the interagency organization established to maintain uniform geographic name usage throughout the federal government. It provides the official place names required by law for use in federal government publications, including maps, web sites, and documents. The standardized spelling and use of geographic names allows the federal government to communicate clearly and unambiguously about places, reducing the potential for confusion.
While the Board’s authority only applies to the federal government, the Board’s decisions and its standards of use for geographic names are almost always followed by state and local governments and by commercial organizations. The BGN does not initiate naming or renaming actions. It responds to proposals received from Federal agencies; State, local, and Tribal governments; and the public.
The usefulness of standardizing geographic names is well proven, even if it is often taken for granted. The United Nations actively supports international standardization of geographic names by encouraging strong programs of national standardization. More than 50 nations have some type of national names authority.
The origin of the Board and its work
Following the surge of exploration and settlement of the Western territories and Alaska after the American Civil War, inconsistencies among many names, spellings, and applications became a serious problem to surveyors, map makers, and scientists who required uniform geographic nomenclature. Accordingly, President Benjamin Harrison signed an Executive Order on Sept. 4, 1890, establishing the Board and giving it authority to resolve unsettled geographic names questions. He named Dr. Thomas Corwin Mendenhall, Superintendent of the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, as its first chairman.
Two of the Board’s earliest decisions from its first meeting in 1890 illustrate its continuing goal of name standardization. The Board decided on the official spelling of Bering Sea (not Behring, Behrings, Kamchatka) in Alaska and on official recognition of the name of the Anacostia River (not Eastern Branch) in Washington, D.C. The disallowed spellings and name usages were preserved in the official record of Board decisions as variant (not official) names for reference purposes, just as they are today.
The Board gradually expanded its interests to include foreign names and other areas of interest to the United States, a process that accelerated during World War II.
The 1947 public law that established the U.S. Board on Geographic Names in its current form directs the Board to operate conjointly with the Secretary of the Interior. The Board is composed of representatives appointed from six cabinet-level departments (Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Homeland Security, Interior, and State), as well as the Central Intelligence Agency, the Government Printing Office, the Library of Congress, and the U.S. Postal Service.
One Board, two committees
Working through two permanent committees — a Domestic Names Committee and a Foreign Names Committee — the BGN standardizes geographic names worldwide for federal use, including domestic names, foreign names, and names for oceans, seas, and undersea features as well as features in Antarctica. The Secretary of the Interior has final review and approval of BGN actions.
The work of the Foreign Names Committee concerns standardization of foreign geographic names for publications and communications of the U.S. federal government; it has no role in establishing geographic name standards or usage in other countries.
Determining the official names of features in foreign areas can be complicated. A feature may be located in multiple countries that have different languages or names for that feature, or a feature may be located in a single country with multiple languages. For instance, the Danube River, which flows through or borders ten countries, has seven names with different spellings which are approved for use in U.S. federal publications.
The U.S. Geological Survey, as the premier domestic mapping agency in the federal government, provides staff support for processing BGN domestic geographic names decisions and polices. Similarly, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) in the Department of Defense provides staff support for processing foreign geographic names. However, the BGN is not under and does not report to either the USGS or NGA.
The significance of names
Beyond the practical considerations of maps and databases, geographic names are important to every citizen’s sense of place.
“Geographic names are keys to stories and insight about our world,” said Douglas Caldwell, a researcher at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and current BGN chair. “We often use names without thinking much about them, but if we look just a little deeper, we see they are a window on our history and our natural environment.”
When a geographic name controversy is brought to the Domestic Names Committee, the most important factor in the Board’s decision is established local usage. The Board’s goal, within very broad limits of name standardization, is to have the official name reflect the name that the local community actually uses.
Geographic names often carry great cultural significance. For the Foreign Names Committee, using one name in preference to another can even have political implications. For this reason, foreign geographic names are considered carefully and reflect the official policy of the U.S. government.
Accessing geographic name records
U.S. Board on Geographic Names databases and other resources are available from the Board’s home page. The web site provides access to all BGN place name resources through queries to the Board’s on-line databases, as well as download capabilities for larger place name files.
The U.S. Board on Geographic Names approves and standardizes geographic names for the federal government. The Board’s decisions involve names for domestic, foreign, Antarctic, and undersea features. As a coordinating body that works with the Secretary of the Interior, the Board reduces duplication of work, personnel, and authority among agencies. The Board has promoted clear and effective communication throughout the federal government for more than 120 years.