Glacier change in the western U.S. and Alaska: New insights from reanalysis of old data

Release Date:

This article is part of the Spring 2020 issue of the Earth Science Matters Newsletter.

Glaciers are dynamic reservoirs of frozen water that affect society on local to global scales, with impacts ranging from global sea level to regional freshwater supply, hazards, and effects on downstream ecosystems. Field records of glacier mass change reflect seasonal and interannual variability that is otherwise difficult to capture, yet only 39 glaciers on Earth have continuous, long-term (30+ years) field records of this change, known as mass balance. This limit in directly observed glacier data makes it challenging to validate physical models that are used to project sea level and manage water resources.

Mass balance field data consist of measurements of snow accumulation and snow and ice melt. Winter snow accumulation is measured in snow pits and snow cores, while summer melt is measured via repeat visits to ablation stakes. These direct, field measurements are made seasonally at a series of fixed locations on each glacier.

exposed ablation stake in the fall at Wolverine Glacier

An ablation stake which began the summer below the surface of the snow is shown here in the fall, extending far above bare ice surface of Wolverine Glacier, Alaska. A USGS scientist carries a portable steam drill, used to install the stakes in the glacier.

(Credit: Emily Baker, USGS. Public domain.)

scientists collect field data at Gulkana Glacier

USGS scientists collect field data at Gulkana Glacier in the eastern Alaska Range. The checkerboard sampling pattern in the foreground indicates where snow pit density measurements were collected. A series of snow cores (one is laying on top of the black tool box) collected by drilling into the seasonal snowpack will be used to measure the density at even deeper depths. If you look closely at the snow core in this photo, a darker band is visible near the middle. This dirty layer indicates the bottom of the seasonal snowpack within the snow core and was the previous summer melt surface on the glacier. It's somewhat unusual for the summer surface to be dirty enough that it could be seen at the distance of this photo - but we got lucky! Lastly, the scientist on the left is holding an ablation stake, which is used to measure melt or accumulation of snow on the glacier.

(Credit: Louis Sass, USGS. Public domain.)

mapped location of the five USGS benchmark glaciers

Figure 1: Location of the five USGS Benchmark Glaciers (colored circles) among the glacierized regions of North America (blue). (adapted from Fig.1 in O’Neel et al., 2019).

(Public domain.)

The USGS measures glacier mass balance and records climate data at five North American glaciers in order to enhance understanding of the physical processes that link glaciers to climate, ecosystems, and hydrologic processes. These five glaciers are collectively known as the USGS Benchmark Glaciers; measurements began at Lemon Creek Glacier (AK) in 1953, South Cascade Glacier (WA) in 1958, Gulkana and Wolverine glaciers (AK) in 1966, and Sperry Glacier (MT) in 2005. These glaciers span continental and maritime climate regimes that contain glaciers across the western United States and Alaska, as shown in Figure 1. The benchmark glaciers in Washington and Alaska have the longest continuous, mass balance records in the United States, and their records are among the longest in the world. They make up four out of six U.S. ‘reference’ glaciers in the World Glacier Monitoring Service’s internationally coordinated glacier monitoring network, with data used regularly in authoritative international climate assessment reports.

Historically, comparison of these 50+ year records was problematic, as the methods for data collection and analysis were different at each of the five benchmark glaciers. Recent USGS efforts integrated the Benchmark Glacier Project into a cohesive effort with standardized data collection, analytical methods and fully reanalyzed, intercomparable estimates of annual and seasonal glacier mass change. This reanalysis process consisted of three steps. First, we used local weather station data to standardize our observed changes at each sample site into a common chronology at each glacier. Second, we integrated the observed mass changes over the glacier surface. Third, we used volume changes calculated from a series of digital elevation models, known as geodetic mass balance, to assess and remove biases in our integrated direct measurements. Finally, we repeated the second and third steps with a suite of plausible variations on the basic methods to understand uncertainties in the results. Our approach encompasses errors related to extrapolation of point measurements that formal error propagation cannot resolve. This empowers scientists and stakeholders with practical error bounds, so that USGS Benchmark Glacier records can be applied to real world water management, decision making, and scientific problems.

The results of our reanalysis show persistent cumulative mass losses in conjunction with decreasing glacier areas (Figure 2). This is consistent with other studies documenting the overall decreasing volume of land ice on Earth. Comparing results among USGS Benchmark Glaciers shows that distance from the coast has a stronger effect on glacier mass loss than latitude. Our results also challenge the paradigm that mass balance is primarily controlled by elevation, rather showing widespread influence from wind drifting of snow, shading and surface fracturing at all glaciers.

graphs of cumulative mass change at benchmark glaciers 1950 to present

Figure 2: The cumulative mass change at each glacier, expressed in meters of water equivalent. Note that each glacier is measured relative to the start of mass balance measurements at that site. Geodetic mass balances (black squares) from photogrammetrically derived digital elevation models are used to constrain the time series (adapted from Fig.4 in O’Neel et al., 2019).

(Public domain.)

Regardless of glacier latitude, elevation, or proximity to the coast, the results of our reanalysis show that glacier mass loss across the five benchmark glaciers is driven by increasing summer temperatures. Currently, we are leveraging the reanalysis results and framework to understand the benchmark glaciers in a broader context. Comparison of Lemon Creek Glacier (AK) with neighboring Taku Glacier (AK) allowed us to examine the opposing responses of the two glaciers to the same climate, highlighting the importance of valley geometry and elevation distribution in the glacier-climate relationship. Additionally, we were able to identify the initiation of Taku Glacier’s retreat after over 130 years of glacier growth.

The paper “Reanalysis of the US Geological Survey Benchmark Glaciers: long-term insight into climate forcing of glacier mass balance” is published in Journal of Glaciology: doi.org/10.1017/jog.2019.66.

New work leveraging this reanalysis “Explaining mass-balance and retreat dichotomies at Taku and Lemon Creek Glaciers, Alaska” is published in Journal of Glaciology: doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.22.

All USGS Benchmark Glacier Project data are publicly available in USGS data releases: doi.org/10.5066/P9AGXQSR.

<< Back to Spring 2020 Newsletter

Related Content

Filter Total Items: 1
Date published: November 6, 2018
Status: Active

USGS Benchmark Glacier Project

Scientists with the USGS Benchmark Glacier Project study the process and impacts of glacier change, including sea-level rise, water resources, environmental hazards and ecosystem links. At the core of this research are mass balance measurements at five glaciers in the United States. Since the 1960s, these glaciers have been studied using direct observations of glaciers and meteorology. The...