Indicators of Rangeland Health Completed
Rangelands are natural ecosystems where the native vegetation consists predominantly of grasses, grass-like plants, forbs, or shrubs. Rangelands include natural grasslands, savannas, shrublands, oak and pinyon-juniper woodlands, many deserts, tundra, alpine communities, marshes, and wet meadows.
It is important for land managers and technical assistance specialists to be able to assess the status of rangeland ecosystems in order to know where to focus management efforts. The term “Rangeland Health” has become a publicly accepted term that relates to status of rangelands. It is defined as “the degree to which the integrity of the soil, vegetation, water, and air, as well as the ecological processes of the rangeland ecosystem, are balanced and sustained.” Integrity in this context means the “maintenance of the functional attributes characteristic of a locale, including normal variability.”
In a collaborative effort, the ARS, BLM, NRCS, USFS, and USGS have jointly developed a system in which 17 indicators are used to gauge three attributes of rangeland health: soil and site stability, hydrologic function, and biotic integrity. The Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health (IIRH) protocol is designed for assessing ecosystem function on rangelands and woodlands and has been in use by for two decades. Version 5 of IIRH is the third published edition of this protocol and reflects changes learned through 13 years of teaching and applying previous versions. These changes should improve the consistency of the application and interpretations made using this protocol. Future revisions are anticipated as science and experience provide additional information on indicators and assessments of rangeland health. The evaluation is used widely by the BLM, the Natural Resources Conservation Service, and many private rangeland consultants.
Pellant, M., Shaver, P.L., Pyke, D.A., Herrick, J.E., Lepak, N., Riegel, G., Kachergis, E.J., Newingham, B.A., Toledo, D.P., Busby, F.E., 2020, Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health, Version 5: Bureau of Land Management Technical Reference 1734-6, p. 187, https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70215720
Below are other science projects associated with this project.
Below are data or web applications associated with this project.
Below are publications associated with this project.
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health, Version 5: Bureau of Land Management Technical Reference 1734-6
Transitions in rangeland evaluations: A review of the major transitions in rangeland evaluations during the last 25 years and speculation about future evaluations
New proposed national resources inventory protocols on nonfederal rangelands
Assessing rangelands
Rangeland health attributes and indicators for qualitative assessment
Successional theory and the desired plant community approach
- Overview
Rangelands are natural ecosystems where the native vegetation consists predominantly of grasses, grass-like plants, forbs, or shrubs. Rangelands include natural grasslands, savannas, shrublands, oak and pinyon-juniper woodlands, many deserts, tundra, alpine communities, marshes, and wet meadows.
It is important for land managers and technical assistance specialists to be able to assess the status of rangeland ecosystems in order to know where to focus management efforts. The term “Rangeland Health” has become a publicly accepted term that relates to status of rangelands. It is defined as “the degree to which the integrity of the soil, vegetation, water, and air, as well as the ecological processes of the rangeland ecosystem, are balanced and sustained.” Integrity in this context means the “maintenance of the functional attributes characteristic of a locale, including normal variability.”
In a collaborative effort, the ARS, BLM, NRCS, USFS, and USGS have jointly developed a system in which 17 indicators are used to gauge three attributes of rangeland health: soil and site stability, hydrologic function, and biotic integrity. The Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health (IIRH) protocol is designed for assessing ecosystem function on rangelands and woodlands and has been in use by for two decades. Version 5 of IIRH is the third published edition of this protocol and reflects changes learned through 13 years of teaching and applying previous versions. These changes should improve the consistency of the application and interpretations made using this protocol. Future revisions are anticipated as science and experience provide additional information on indicators and assessments of rangeland health. The evaluation is used widely by the BLM, the Natural Resources Conservation Service, and many private rangeland consultants.
Pellant, M., Shaver, P.L., Pyke, D.A., Herrick, J.E., Lepak, N., Riegel, G., Kachergis, E.J., Newingham, B.A., Toledo, D.P., Busby, F.E., 2020, Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health, Version 5: Bureau of Land Management Technical Reference 1734-6, p. 187, https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70215720
- Science
Below are other science projects associated with this project.
- Data
Below are data or web applications associated with this project.
- Publications
Below are publications associated with this project.
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health, Version 5: Bureau of Land Management Technical Reference 1734-6
The Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health (IIRH) protocol is designed for assessing ecosystem function on rangelands and woodlands. The protocol was developed by an interagency cadre of technical experts and has been in use by for two decades. The protocol is well accepted and is a valuable tool for communicating rangeland conditions with stakeholders. Technical Reference 1734-6 Version 4,AuthorsMike Pellant, Patrick L Shaver, David A. Pyke, Jeffrey E. Herrick, Nika Lepak, Gregg Riegel, Emily Kachergis, Beth A. Newingham, David Toledo, Frank E BusbyFilter Total Items: 17Transitions in rangeland evaluations: A review of the major transitions in rangeland evaluations during the last 25 years and speculation about future evaluations
No abstract available.AuthorsDavid A. Pyke, Jeffrey E. HerrickNew proposed national resources inventory protocols on nonfederal rangelands
No abstract available.AuthorsK.E. Spaeth, F.B. Pierson, J. E. Herrick, P. Shaver, David A. Pyke, Mike Pellant, D. Thompson, B. DaytonAssessing rangelands
It is important for land managers and technical assistance specialists to be able to assess the health of rangelands in order to know where to focus management efforts. The complexity of ecological processes, and the inherent expense of directly measuring site integrity, suggests a need for an evaluation process that focuses instead on biological and physical attributes. In a collaborative effoAuthorsDavid A. PykeRangeland health attributes and indicators for qualitative assessment
Panels of experts from the Society for Range Management and the National Research Council proposed that status of rangeland ecosystems could be ascertained by evaluating an ecological site's potential to conserve soil resources and by a series of indicators for ecosystem processes and site stability. Using these recommendations as a starting point, we developed a rapid, qualitative method for asseAuthorsDavid A. Pyke, Jeffrey E. Herrick, Patrick Shaver, Mike PellantSuccessional theory and the desired plant community approach
No abstract available.AuthorsMichael M. Borman, David A. Pyke