Policy Analysis and Decision Support Active
Social and Economic Analysis Branch Social Scientists investigate the process of environmental decision making and how stakeholder engagement strategies, policies, institutions, and decision support tools influence management outcomes.
Environmental decision makers require quality science for their management decisions. But even the best science is implemented within specific social and institutional contexts, which may create barriers or opportunities to meeting desired goals.
Specifically, our work asks the following kinds of questions:
-
How do interactions among scientists, decision makers, and stakeholders influence the effective translation of science into decision making?
-
How does the design and implementation of decision support tools influence group learning, negotiation, and decision making?
-
How do institutional and regulatory structures shape the process and outcome of decision making?
Below are other science projects associated with this project.
Conservation Introductions: Enhancing Decision Support for the Pacific Northwest and Pacific Islands
Designing and Evaluating Decision Support Tools (DSTs)
Collaboration and Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Bureau of Land Management
Human Dimensions of Ecological Drought
Social and Ecological Resilience in Southwestern Colorado
Negotiation Skills for Natural Resource Professionals: Building a Foundation
The Fort Collins Science Center's Social and Economic Analysis (SEA) Branch has been conducting and publishing research on multi-party natural resource negotiation since the 1980s. This research has led to the development of the basic negotiation training courses. This course is a mix of lecture, hands-on training, and discussion. Please join us and other natural resource professiona
- Overview
Social and Economic Analysis Branch Social Scientists investigate the process of environmental decision making and how stakeholder engagement strategies, policies, institutions, and decision support tools influence management outcomes.
Environmental decision makers require quality science for their management decisions. But even the best science is implemented within specific social and institutional contexts, which may create barriers or opportunities to meeting desired goals.
Specifically, our work asks the following kinds of questions:-
How do interactions among scientists, decision makers, and stakeholders influence the effective translation of science into decision making?
-
How does the design and implementation of decision support tools influence group learning, negotiation, and decision making?
-
How do institutional and regulatory structures shape the process and outcome of decision making?
-
- Science
Below are other science projects associated with this project.
Conservation Introductions: Enhancing Decision Support for the Pacific Northwest and Pacific Islands
This research effort is an interagency partnership between U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to systematically explore the issues, viewpoints, and concerns within the Service in relation to conservation introductions. Conservation introduction is the planned, intentional moving of species, populations or genotypes to a location outside a target’s native range.Designing and Evaluating Decision Support Tools (DSTs)
Effective environmental management requires integrating scientific information into complex decision making processes.Collaboration and Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Bureau of Land Management
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) established the Collaboration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Program in 1997 in order to comply with federal mandates and assist the BLM field in working effectively with other agencies, state, local, and Tribal governments, interest groups, stakeholders, and the public.Human Dimensions of Ecological Drought
Ecological impacts of drought have been rarely considered compared to agricultural or municipal water supply effects.Social and Ecological Resilience in Southwestern Colorado
Understanding potential changes in ecological, social, and climate systems can help managers and decision makers take actions to ensure that natural landscapes and human communities remain healthy and are able to provide essential ecosystem services now and in the future.Negotiation Skills for Natural Resource Professionals: Building a Foundation
The Fort Collins Science Center's Social and Economic Analysis (SEA) Branch has been conducting and publishing research on multi-party natural resource negotiation since the 1980s. This research has led to the development of the basic negotiation training courses. This course is a mix of lecture, hands-on training, and discussion. Please join us and other natural resource professiona