Hydroacoustic Applications: Technological Advancements in the Streamgaging Network Active
Hydroacousticss: Technological Advancements in the Streamgaging
In the mid-1990s, a new technology emerged in the field of inland streamflow monitoring. The South Atlantic Water Science Center is making great use of the acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP). It was originally developed for oceanographic work, but was adapted for inland streamflow measurements. This instrument is transforming the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) streamgaging program.
Until the 1990s, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) had been making streamflow measurements using the same type of equipment for more than 100 years. The Price AA current meter (figure 1) was developed by USGS engineers in 1896. Until recently, the majority of all streamflow measurements made by the USGS were made using this instrument.
Streamflow information is used to predict floods, manage and allocate water resources, design engineering structures, compute water-quality loads, and operate water-control structures. The USGS has progressively improved the streamgaging program by incorporating new technologies and techniques that streamline data collection while increasing the quality of the streamflow data that are collected. The single greatest change in streamflow measurement technology during the last 100 years has been the development and application of high frequency acoustic instruments for measuring streamflow. One such instrument, the acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP), is rapidly replacing traditional mechanical current meters for streamflow measurement (Muste and others, 2007). For more information on how an ADCP works see Simpson (2001) or visit http://hydroacoustics.usgs.gov/.
The USGS has used ADCPs attached to manned or tethered boats since the mid-1990s to measure streamflow in a wide variety of conditions (fig. 1). Recent analyses have shown that ADCP streamflow measurements can be made with similar or greater accuracy, efficiency, and resolution than measurements made using conventional current-meter methods (Oberg and Mueller, 2007). ADCPs also have the ability to measure streamflow in streams where traditional current-meter measurements previously were very difficult or costly to obtain, such as streams affected by backwater or tides. In addition to streamflow measurements, the USGS also uses ADCPs for other hydrologic measurements and applications, such as computing continuous records of streamflow for tidally or backwater affected streams, measuring velocity fields with high spatial and temporal resolution, and estimating suspended-sediment concentrations. An overview of these applications is provided below.
In situ Index Velocity Measurements
Acoustic Doppler technology also has been developed for in situ deployments. Many streams do not have a direct streamflow-to-gage height (water-surface elevation referenced to a datum) relation (figure 6). These sites include streams influenced by control structures, aquatic plant growth, general backwater effects, and tidal effects. Historically, computation of streamflow at these sites has been difficult. Deploying in situ acoustic Doppler instruments allows the USGS to “index” the mean channel velocity. At these “index-velocity” sites, a mean channel velocity is computed by dividing the measured streamflow by the cross-sectional area (from a standardized area rating). The computed mean velocity then is compared to the velocity reported by the in situ velocity meter. Multiple measurements can be used to produce an index-velocity rating.
The USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center uses index-velocity methods at multiple sites. In the upstate Piedmont region, backwater effects from lakes necessitate the use of index-velocity methods to compute streamflow in the Pacolet River. In most of the Coastal Plain, in situ velocity meters are required to compute streamflow in the tidally affected areas.
The use of hydroacoustic instrumentation for real-time streamflow measurements, in addition to fixed installations for the computation of long-term record, has enabled the SAWSC to collect quality hydrologic data for diverse hydrologic settings.
Streamflow Measurements
The first attempt to use an ADCP to measure streamflow was made in 1982 on the Mississippi River by Christensen and Herrick (1982) as part of work conducted for the USGS. In 1985, the USGS purchased an ADCP and developed software for making streamflow measurements (Simpson, 2001). Since then, ADCPs have proven to be useful tools for measuring streamflow throughout the country. For many measurement conditions, the ADCP samples more of the flow (spatially), as compared to traditional mechanical current-meter measurements, resulting in more detailed streamflow information. Typically, it takes 45– 60 minutes to make a mechanical current-meter streamflow measurement using the two-point method (Rantz and others, 1982), a 40-second velocity sampling interval, and approximately 25 vertical measurement sections. An ADCP streamflow measurement can be made at the same section in 15–20 minutes. This increase in efficiency results in cost savings with improved safety conditions, and more detailed streamflow data. ADCP streamflow easurements have been shown to have an uncertainty of 4.5 percent or less (Oberg and Mueller, 2007). Traditional current-meter measurements with a 40-second sampling interval and approximately 25 vertical measurement sections and uniform flow are estimated to have an uncertainty of about 5.5 percent (Pelletier 1988).
An example of how personnel from the USGS Indiana Water Science Center were able to make more streamflow measurements with fewer personnel using ADCPs during a recent flood in central Indiana is given in table 1. Because ADCPs can be used to make streamflow measurements within minutes, they often are used to measure unsteady flows, such as tidally affected streams, or unsteady flows near dams or other control structures (Simpson, 2001). ADCPs also are able to measure extreme low-flow conditions that could not have been measured by using conventional methods.
Index-Velocity Method
With ADCPs, measuring and computing continuous records of streamflow can be conducted in challenging environments. Until the advent of ADCPs, it was difficult or impractical to accurately compute streamflow records on tidally affected rivers or rivers affected by backwater. Two-beam ADCPs can be attached to a fixed structure, such as a pile or bridge pier, and used to measure velocity horizontally for a portion of a channel cross section (fig. 2). The measured velocity at a fixed point in the cross section can be used to compute continuous streamflow records. When a site is subject to periods of vertically stratified directional flow, an ADCP can be mounted at the bottom of the streambed in a vertically oriented or “up-looking” position, and velocities can be measured at multiple points or “bins” throughout the water column (fig. 3).
Measured velocity and stage or water-surface elevation data are used with the index-velocity method (Ruhl and Simpson, 2005) to compute continuous records of streamflow. In the index-velocity method, two ratings (or relations) are developed and maintained—a stage-area rating and an index-velocity rating. The stage-area rating is developed by surveying a stable cross section in the stream near the permanently mounted ADCP. The channel area for a given stage then can be determined from the surveyed cross section. An index-velocity rating (fig. 4) is developed by using the relation between the measured mean cross-sectional velocity at the surveyed cross section and the simultaneous index velocity measured with the permanently mounted ADCP. Continuous records of stage and index velocity are converted to a channel area and mean velocity using the respective ratings. The channel area then can be multiplied by the mean velocity over time to compute a continuous record of streamflow.
Measuring Velocity Fields
The USGS has used two-dimensional horizontal water velocity measured by an ADCP to map velocities in a stream or estuary. Dinehart and Burau (2005) used successive surveys with an ADCP and a differential global positioning system (DGPS) to analyze the flow dynamics of a section of a tidal river.
The application of multidimensional numerical hydraulic models is often facilitated with velocity data collected with ADCPs and a DGPS. Wagner and Mueller (2004) used ADCPs to collect depth-averaged velocity data to both calibrate and validate a two-dimensional (2-D) flow model of the Ohio River near Olmsted, Illinois. A single ADCP dataset for model calibration or validation, consisting of repeated ADCP measurements at 15 cross sections, could be collected in 1–2 days. Collecting the equivalent data using current meters would have required more than 1 week.
Estimating Suspended Sediment
For each of the acoustic beams, the ADCP measures the acoustic intensity of signals backscattered to the ADCP by suspended particles in water. After correcting for the effects of temperature and voltage supplied to the ADCP and signal attenuation in the water column, the intensity of the acoustic backscatter is mainly a function of the suspended particles in the water. If the bulk of the suspended particles is composed of suspended sediment, then the backscatter intensity is mainly a function of suspended sediment and can be used as a spatial indicator of suspended-sediment concentration. USGS researchers are investigating and developing new methods for using acoustic backscatter as a surrogate for suspended-sand concentrations.
Summary
The emergence of hydroacoustic instruments, especially ADCPs, has allowed the USGS to adapt the technology for a variety of hydrologic measurements. The USGS uses ADCPs to make accurate streamflow measurements. Often these measurements can be made more efficiently than when using conventional methods. ADCPs permanently mounted in streams and tidal rivers are being used to compute continuous records of streamflow, and research is being conducted to use the same instruments and installations to estimate suspended-sediment concentrations. Calibration and validation of numerical models of flow and transport are facilitated by the rapid measurement of velocity fields using ADCP and DGPS technology. The USGS is leading the way in the implementation of the ADCP for riverine applications. As the technology evolves, the USGS tests ADCPs, develops new methods for measurement and analysis, and prepares guidance for ADCP applications to assure that high-quality data are collected.
References Cited
- Christensen, J.L., and Herrick, L.E., 1982, Mississippi River test, v. 1., Final Rep. DCP4400/300, prepared for the U.S. Geological Survey: AMETEK/Straza Division, El Cajon, Calif.
- Dinehart, R.L., and Burau, J.R., 2005, Repeated surveys by acoustic Doppler current profiler for flow and sediment dynamics in a tidal river: Journal of Hydrology, v. 314, 21 p.
- Gray, J.R., ed., 2005, Proceedings of the Federal Interagency Sediment Monitoring Instrument and Analysis Research Workshop, September 9–11, 2003, Flagstaff, Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1276, 46 p. plus extended abstracts, available only online at http://water.usgs.gov/osw/techniques/sediment/ sedsurrogate2003workshop/listofpapers.html
- Hittle, Clinton, 2005, Hydrologic characteristics of estuarine river systems within Everglades National Park: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2004-3129, 4 p., available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2004/3129/
- Levesque, V.A., 2004, Water flow and nutrient flux from five estuarine rivers along the southwest coast of the Everglades National Park, Florida, 1997–2001: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5142, 24 p., available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2004/5142/
- Muste, M., Vermeyen, T.R., Hotchkiss, R., and Oberg, K.A., 2007, Acoustic velocimetry for riverine environments: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, v. 133, no. 12, p. 1297–1298.
- Oberg, K.A. and Mueller, D.S., 2007, Validation of streamflow measurements made with Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, v. 133, no. 12, p. 1421–1432.
- Pelletier, P.M., 1988, Uncertainties in the single determination of river discharge—A literature review: Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, v. 15, no. 5, p. 834–850.
- Rantz, S.E., and others, 1982, Measurement and computation of streamflow: U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2175, v. 2, 631 p.
- Ruhl, C.A., and Simpson, M.R., 2005, Computation of discharge using the index-velocity method in tidally affected areas: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5004, 31 p., available online only at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2005/5004/
- Simpson, M.R., 2001, Discharge measurements using a broad-band acoustic Doppler current profiler: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 01-1, 134 p.
- Topping, D.J., Wright, S.A., Melis, T.S., and Rubin, D.M., 2007, High-resolution measurements of suspended-sediment concentration and grain size in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon using a multi-frequency acoustic system: Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on River Sedimentation, August 1– 4, 2007, Moscow, Russia, v. 3, p. 330–339.
- Wagner, C.R. and Mueller, D.S., 2004, Results of a two-dimensional hydrodynamic and sediment-transport model to predict the effects of the phased construction and operation of the Olmsted Locks and Dam on the Ohio River near Olmsted, Illinois: U.S. Geological Survey Water- Resources Investigations Report 03-4336, 31 p., available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wri034336/
- Wall, G.R., Nystrom, E.A., and Litten, S., 2006, Use of an ADCP to compute suspended-sediment discharge in the tidal Hudson River, New York: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5055, 26 p., available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5055
In the mid-1990s, a new technology emerged in the field of inland streamflow monitoring. The South Atlantic Water Science Center is making great use of the acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP). It was originally developed for oceanographic work, but was adapted for inland streamflow measurements. This instrument is transforming the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) streamgaging program.
Until the 1990s, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) had been making streamflow measurements using the same type of equipment for more than 100 years. The Price AA current meter (figure 1) was developed by USGS engineers in 1896. Until recently, the majority of all streamflow measurements made by the USGS were made using this instrument.
Streamflow information is used to predict floods, manage and allocate water resources, design engineering structures, compute water-quality loads, and operate water-control structures. The USGS has progressively improved the streamgaging program by incorporating new technologies and techniques that streamline data collection while increasing the quality of the streamflow data that are collected. The single greatest change in streamflow measurement technology during the last 100 years has been the development and application of high frequency acoustic instruments for measuring streamflow. One such instrument, the acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP), is rapidly replacing traditional mechanical current meters for streamflow measurement (Muste and others, 2007). For more information on how an ADCP works see Simpson (2001) or visit http://hydroacoustics.usgs.gov/.
The USGS has used ADCPs attached to manned or tethered boats since the mid-1990s to measure streamflow in a wide variety of conditions (fig. 1). Recent analyses have shown that ADCP streamflow measurements can be made with similar or greater accuracy, efficiency, and resolution than measurements made using conventional current-meter methods (Oberg and Mueller, 2007). ADCPs also have the ability to measure streamflow in streams where traditional current-meter measurements previously were very difficult or costly to obtain, such as streams affected by backwater or tides. In addition to streamflow measurements, the USGS also uses ADCPs for other hydrologic measurements and applications, such as computing continuous records of streamflow for tidally or backwater affected streams, measuring velocity fields with high spatial and temporal resolution, and estimating suspended-sediment concentrations. An overview of these applications is provided below.
In situ Index Velocity Measurements
Acoustic Doppler technology also has been developed for in situ deployments. Many streams do not have a direct streamflow-to-gage height (water-surface elevation referenced to a datum) relation (figure 6). These sites include streams influenced by control structures, aquatic plant growth, general backwater effects, and tidal effects. Historically, computation of streamflow at these sites has been difficult. Deploying in situ acoustic Doppler instruments allows the USGS to “index” the mean channel velocity. At these “index-velocity” sites, a mean channel velocity is computed by dividing the measured streamflow by the cross-sectional area (from a standardized area rating). The computed mean velocity then is compared to the velocity reported by the in situ velocity meter. Multiple measurements can be used to produce an index-velocity rating.
The USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center uses index-velocity methods at multiple sites. In the upstate Piedmont region, backwater effects from lakes necessitate the use of index-velocity methods to compute streamflow in the Pacolet River. In most of the Coastal Plain, in situ velocity meters are required to compute streamflow in the tidally affected areas.
The use of hydroacoustic instrumentation for real-time streamflow measurements, in addition to fixed installations for the computation of long-term record, has enabled the SAWSC to collect quality hydrologic data for diverse hydrologic settings.
Streamflow Measurements
The first attempt to use an ADCP to measure streamflow was made in 1982 on the Mississippi River by Christensen and Herrick (1982) as part of work conducted for the USGS. In 1985, the USGS purchased an ADCP and developed software for making streamflow measurements (Simpson, 2001). Since then, ADCPs have proven to be useful tools for measuring streamflow throughout the country. For many measurement conditions, the ADCP samples more of the flow (spatially), as compared to traditional mechanical current-meter measurements, resulting in more detailed streamflow information. Typically, it takes 45– 60 minutes to make a mechanical current-meter streamflow measurement using the two-point method (Rantz and others, 1982), a 40-second velocity sampling interval, and approximately 25 vertical measurement sections. An ADCP streamflow measurement can be made at the same section in 15–20 minutes. This increase in efficiency results in cost savings with improved safety conditions, and more detailed streamflow data. ADCP streamflow easurements have been shown to have an uncertainty of 4.5 percent or less (Oberg and Mueller, 2007). Traditional current-meter measurements with a 40-second sampling interval and approximately 25 vertical measurement sections and uniform flow are estimated to have an uncertainty of about 5.5 percent (Pelletier 1988).
An example of how personnel from the USGS Indiana Water Science Center were able to make more streamflow measurements with fewer personnel using ADCPs during a recent flood in central Indiana is given in table 1. Because ADCPs can be used to make streamflow measurements within minutes, they often are used to measure unsteady flows, such as tidally affected streams, or unsteady flows near dams or other control structures (Simpson, 2001). ADCPs also are able to measure extreme low-flow conditions that could not have been measured by using conventional methods.
Index-Velocity Method
With ADCPs, measuring and computing continuous records of streamflow can be conducted in challenging environments. Until the advent of ADCPs, it was difficult or impractical to accurately compute streamflow records on tidally affected rivers or rivers affected by backwater. Two-beam ADCPs can be attached to a fixed structure, such as a pile or bridge pier, and used to measure velocity horizontally for a portion of a channel cross section (fig. 2). The measured velocity at a fixed point in the cross section can be used to compute continuous streamflow records. When a site is subject to periods of vertically stratified directional flow, an ADCP can be mounted at the bottom of the streambed in a vertically oriented or “up-looking” position, and velocities can be measured at multiple points or “bins” throughout the water column (fig. 3).
Measured velocity and stage or water-surface elevation data are used with the index-velocity method (Ruhl and Simpson, 2005) to compute continuous records of streamflow. In the index-velocity method, two ratings (or relations) are developed and maintained—a stage-area rating and an index-velocity rating. The stage-area rating is developed by surveying a stable cross section in the stream near the permanently mounted ADCP. The channel area for a given stage then can be determined from the surveyed cross section. An index-velocity rating (fig. 4) is developed by using the relation between the measured mean cross-sectional velocity at the surveyed cross section and the simultaneous index velocity measured with the permanently mounted ADCP. Continuous records of stage and index velocity are converted to a channel area and mean velocity using the respective ratings. The channel area then can be multiplied by the mean velocity over time to compute a continuous record of streamflow.
Measuring Velocity Fields
The USGS has used two-dimensional horizontal water velocity measured by an ADCP to map velocities in a stream or estuary. Dinehart and Burau (2005) used successive surveys with an ADCP and a differential global positioning system (DGPS) to analyze the flow dynamics of a section of a tidal river.
The application of multidimensional numerical hydraulic models is often facilitated with velocity data collected with ADCPs and a DGPS. Wagner and Mueller (2004) used ADCPs to collect depth-averaged velocity data to both calibrate and validate a two-dimensional (2-D) flow model of the Ohio River near Olmsted, Illinois. A single ADCP dataset for model calibration or validation, consisting of repeated ADCP measurements at 15 cross sections, could be collected in 1–2 days. Collecting the equivalent data using current meters would have required more than 1 week.
Estimating Suspended Sediment
For each of the acoustic beams, the ADCP measures the acoustic intensity of signals backscattered to the ADCP by suspended particles in water. After correcting for the effects of temperature and voltage supplied to the ADCP and signal attenuation in the water column, the intensity of the acoustic backscatter is mainly a function of the suspended particles in the water. If the bulk of the suspended particles is composed of suspended sediment, then the backscatter intensity is mainly a function of suspended sediment and can be used as a spatial indicator of suspended-sediment concentration. USGS researchers are investigating and developing new methods for using acoustic backscatter as a surrogate for suspended-sand concentrations.
Summary
The emergence of hydroacoustic instruments, especially ADCPs, has allowed the USGS to adapt the technology for a variety of hydrologic measurements. The USGS uses ADCPs to make accurate streamflow measurements. Often these measurements can be made more efficiently than when using conventional methods. ADCPs permanently mounted in streams and tidal rivers are being used to compute continuous records of streamflow, and research is being conducted to use the same instruments and installations to estimate suspended-sediment concentrations. Calibration and validation of numerical models of flow and transport are facilitated by the rapid measurement of velocity fields using ADCP and DGPS technology. The USGS is leading the way in the implementation of the ADCP for riverine applications. As the technology evolves, the USGS tests ADCPs, develops new methods for measurement and analysis, and prepares guidance for ADCP applications to assure that high-quality data are collected.
References Cited
- Christensen, J.L., and Herrick, L.E., 1982, Mississippi River test, v. 1., Final Rep. DCP4400/300, prepared for the U.S. Geological Survey: AMETEK/Straza Division, El Cajon, Calif.
- Dinehart, R.L., and Burau, J.R., 2005, Repeated surveys by acoustic Doppler current profiler for flow and sediment dynamics in a tidal river: Journal of Hydrology, v. 314, 21 p.
- Gray, J.R., ed., 2005, Proceedings of the Federal Interagency Sediment Monitoring Instrument and Analysis Research Workshop, September 9–11, 2003, Flagstaff, Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1276, 46 p. plus extended abstracts, available only online at http://water.usgs.gov/osw/techniques/sediment/ sedsurrogate2003workshop/listofpapers.html
- Hittle, Clinton, 2005, Hydrologic characteristics of estuarine river systems within Everglades National Park: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2004-3129, 4 p., available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2004/3129/
- Levesque, V.A., 2004, Water flow and nutrient flux from five estuarine rivers along the southwest coast of the Everglades National Park, Florida, 1997–2001: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5142, 24 p., available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2004/5142/
- Muste, M., Vermeyen, T.R., Hotchkiss, R., and Oberg, K.A., 2007, Acoustic velocimetry for riverine environments: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, v. 133, no. 12, p. 1297–1298.
- Oberg, K.A. and Mueller, D.S., 2007, Validation of streamflow measurements made with Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, v. 133, no. 12, p. 1421–1432.
- Pelletier, P.M., 1988, Uncertainties in the single determination of river discharge—A literature review: Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, v. 15, no. 5, p. 834–850.
- Rantz, S.E., and others, 1982, Measurement and computation of streamflow: U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2175, v. 2, 631 p.
- Ruhl, C.A., and Simpson, M.R., 2005, Computation of discharge using the index-velocity method in tidally affected areas: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5004, 31 p., available online only at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2005/5004/
- Simpson, M.R., 2001, Discharge measurements using a broad-band acoustic Doppler current profiler: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 01-1, 134 p.
- Topping, D.J., Wright, S.A., Melis, T.S., and Rubin, D.M., 2007, High-resolution measurements of suspended-sediment concentration and grain size in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon using a multi-frequency acoustic system: Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on River Sedimentation, August 1– 4, 2007, Moscow, Russia, v. 3, p. 330–339.
- Wagner, C.R. and Mueller, D.S., 2004, Results of a two-dimensional hydrodynamic and sediment-transport model to predict the effects of the phased construction and operation of the Olmsted Locks and Dam on the Ohio River near Olmsted, Illinois: U.S. Geological Survey Water- Resources Investigations Report 03-4336, 31 p., available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wri034336/
- Wall, G.R., Nystrom, E.A., and Litten, S., 2006, Use of an ADCP to compute suspended-sediment discharge in the tidal Hudson River, New York: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5055, 26 p., available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5055