Contaminants Affect Fish and Wildlife in the Chesapeake Bay Completed
Chesapeake Bay Watershed, Outlined in Blue
Chesapeake Bay Technical Report Cover
“Legacy contaminants” and “contaminants of emerging concern” that persist in the environment are affecting the health of fish and wildlife in the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed. State continue to report impaired water resources due to the persistence and toxicity of some previously banned pollutants. In addition, other contaminants of emerging concern are released to the environment at levels known, or suspected, to harm the health of fish and wildlife. Such is the major finding of a recent report on toxic contaminants in the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed. The report describes a study conducted by a team of scientists and managers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hampton Roads Sanitation District of Virginia, and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).
The team reviewed State water-quality assessment reports, agency documents, and the peer-reviewed literature to summarize the state of knowledge about contaminants in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. This study is the first comprehensive review of contaminants (including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), metals, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, personal-care products, hormones, and others) that were scientifically evaluated for the watershed. The report will be used to help the Chesapeake Bay Program partnership make decisions about strategies to minimize the impact of contaminants on the environmental health of the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
The study team evaluated groups of contaminants in terms of their occurrence in water resources and associated bed sediment, as well as their known, or potential, effects on fish and wildlife. Several groups of contaminants (PCBs, PAHs, herbicides, and mercury) were widely distributed across the watershed, although only PCBs, mercury, and some organochlorine insecticides were determined to be of high severity in terms of adverse effects across the watershed or in local areas. Other groups of contaminants such as pharmaceuticals, hormones, and some pesticides were highlighted because the sources (such as wastewater discharges and agricultural land uses) are extensive throughout the watershed, even if monitoring data and information related to impairments are scarce.
The 2012 report is the result of the President’s Chesapeake Bay Executive Order (EO 13508) that directed Federal agencies to prepare a report summarizing information on the extent and severity of the occurrence of toxic contamination in the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed. USGS participation in creating the report was sponsored in part by the USGS Priority Ecosystems Science, Toxic Substances Hydrology, and Contaminants Biology Programs. The USGS participates in the Chesapeake Bay Program by providing data, conducting studies, and supporting scientists serving on technical committees and workgroups.
Health Effects
The report team used peer-reviewed literature (journal articles and other scientific publications) to describe the potential connections between contaminants and their health effects on fish and wildlife. The team found that the health of fish continues to be degraded by:
- increased infectious diseases and parasites that cause fish kills,
- feminization (intersex conditions) of largemouth and smallmouth bass,
- reduced reproductive success of yellow perch, and
- tumors in bottom-dwelling fish.
All these effects are likely related to toxic contaminants. In a few locations, contaminants adversely affect the health of wildlife, primarily birds, as evidenced by:
- eggshell thinning,
- death of embryos, and
- failure of eggs to hatch.
Reference
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Geological Survey, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2012, Toxic contaminants in the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed--Extent and severity of occurrence and potential biological effects--Technical Report--December, 2012: Annapolis, Md., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office, 175 p.
Related science listed below.
Neonicotinoid Insecticides Documented in Midwestern U.S. Streams
Common Weed Killer is Widespread in the Environment
Pesticides Common in California Estuary
Biological Activity of Steroid Hormones in U.S. Streams
Chemical Combo and Intersex Fish Found at Smallmouth Bass Nesting Sites
Hormones in Land-Applied Biosolids Could Affect Aquatic Organisms
Improvements in Wastewater Treatment Reduces Endocrine Disruption in Fish
Evidence of Endocrine Disruption Unexpectedly Found in Minnesota Lakes
Estrogenic Contaminants from Plants and Fungi Found in Iowa Streams
Antidepressants in Stream Waters! Are They in the Fish Too?
Related publications shown below.
- Overview
“Legacy contaminants” and “contaminants of emerging concern” that persist in the environment are affecting the health of fish and wildlife in the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed. State continue to report impaired water resources due to the persistence and toxicity of some previously banned pollutants. In addition, other contaminants of emerging concern are released to the environment at levels known, or suspected, to harm the health of fish and wildlife. Such is the major finding of a recent report on toxic contaminants in the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed. The report describes a study conducted by a team of scientists and managers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hampton Roads Sanitation District of Virginia, and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).
The team reviewed State water-quality assessment reports, agency documents, and the peer-reviewed literature to summarize the state of knowledge about contaminants in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. This study is the first comprehensive review of contaminants (including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), metals, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, personal-care products, hormones, and others) that were scientifically evaluated for the watershed. The report will be used to help the Chesapeake Bay Program partnership make decisions about strategies to minimize the impact of contaminants on the environmental health of the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
The study team evaluated groups of contaminants in terms of their occurrence in water resources and associated bed sediment, as well as their known, or potential, effects on fish and wildlife. Several groups of contaminants (PCBs, PAHs, herbicides, and mercury) were widely distributed across the watershed, although only PCBs, mercury, and some organochlorine insecticides were determined to be of high severity in terms of adverse effects across the watershed or in local areas. Other groups of contaminants such as pharmaceuticals, hormones, and some pesticides were highlighted because the sources (such as wastewater discharges and agricultural land uses) are extensive throughout the watershed, even if monitoring data and information related to impairments are scarce.
The 2012 report is the result of the President’s Chesapeake Bay Executive Order (EO 13508) that directed Federal agencies to prepare a report summarizing information on the extent and severity of the occurrence of toxic contamination in the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed. USGS participation in creating the report was sponsored in part by the USGS Priority Ecosystems Science, Toxic Substances Hydrology, and Contaminants Biology Programs. The USGS participates in the Chesapeake Bay Program by providing data, conducting studies, and supporting scientists serving on technical committees and workgroups.
Health Effects
The report team used peer-reviewed literature (journal articles and other scientific publications) to describe the potential connections between contaminants and their health effects on fish and wildlife. The team found that the health of fish continues to be degraded by:
- increased infectious diseases and parasites that cause fish kills,
- feminization (intersex conditions) of largemouth and smallmouth bass,
- reduced reproductive success of yellow perch, and
- tumors in bottom-dwelling fish.
All these effects are likely related to toxic contaminants. In a few locations, contaminants adversely affect the health of wildlife, primarily birds, as evidenced by:
- eggshell thinning,
- death of embryos, and
- failure of eggs to hatch.
Reference
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Geological Survey, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2012, Toxic contaminants in the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed--Extent and severity of occurrence and potential biological effects--Technical Report--December, 2012: Annapolis, Md., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office, 175 p.
- Science
Related science listed below.
Filter Total Items: 22Neonicotinoid Insecticides Documented in Midwestern U.S. Streams
Three neonicotinoid insecticides (clothianidin, thiamethoxam and imidacloprid) were detected commonly throughout the growing season in water samples collected from nine Midwestern stream sites during the 2013 growing season according to a team of U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists. Clothianidin was detected most frequently (75 percent) and at the highest maximum concentration (257 nanograms...Common Weed Killer is Widespread in the Environment
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists report that glyphosate, known commercially by many trade names, and its degradation product AMPA (aminomethylphosphonic acid) are transported off-site from agricultural and urban sources and occur widely in the environment. This study is the largest and most comprehensive assessment of the environmental occurrence of glyphosate and AMPA in the United States...Pesticides Common in California Estuary
Pesticides were observed frequently in water, sediment, and the tissue of resident aquatic organisms from an agriculturally dominated estuary along the central California coast according to a collaborative study by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and University of California, Davis scientists published in Marine Pollution Bulletin .Biological Activity of Steroid Hormones in U.S. Streams
Testing of U.S. streams has detected glucocorticoid and androgen biological activity. In a collaborative study between the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and others, scientists studied the potential for the biological activity in streams of glucocorticoids and androgens hormones—both potential endocrine...Chemical Combo and Intersex Fish Found at Smallmouth Bass Nesting Sites
Chemical contaminants including herbicides, veterinary pharmaceuticals, and biogenic hormones have been detected at fish nesting sites in the Potomac River watershed where endocrine disruption in smallmouth bass ( Micropterus dolomieu ) was also observed. Although these contaminants are known to originate from a variety of human and animal-waste sources, results of a recent U.S. Geological Survey...Hormones in Land-Applied Biosolids Could Affect Aquatic Organisms
Hormones from biosolids applied to fields may be present in rainfall runoff at concentrations that are high enough to impact the health of aquatic organisms if the runoff reaches streams, report scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and Colorado State University in Environmental Science and Technology . Artificial rainfall runoff from agricultural test plots where biosolids were...Improvements in Wastewater Treatment Reduces Endocrine Disruption in Fish
A team of scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the University of Colorado, and the City of Boulder, Colorado, demonstrated that improvements to the treatment process at a wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) reduced the level of endocrine disruption in fish exposed to wastewater effluent discharged from the facility. It is difficult to anticipate the effects that upgrading WWTF...Evidence of Endocrine Disruption Unexpectedly Found in Minnesota Lakes
Endocrine disrupting chemicals and indicators of endocrine disruption were found in several Minnesota lakes with surrounding urban, residential, agricultural, and forested land uses. The lakes do not directly receive discharges from industries or wastewater-treatment plants; however, they are used for recreation, and they receive water from widely scattered sources. The presence of both male and...Estrogenic Contaminants from Plants and Fungi Found in Iowa Streams
An international group of scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon, Research Station ART (Switzerland) have documented the common occurrence of six phytoestrogens and two mycotoxins in streams across Iowa. Phytoestrogens (derived from plants) and mycotoxins (derived from fungi) are naturally occurring compounds. Scientists have known that phytoestrogens...Antidepressants in Stream Waters! Are They in the Fish Too?
For some fish living downstream of sewage treatment plants the answer is yes. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists and their colleagues published a paper in Environmental Science and Technology documenting that specific antidepressants and their degradates found in wastewater discharged into streams by municipal wastewater treatment plants are taken up into the bodies of fish living downstream... - Publications
Related publications shown below.