Large Fraction of Unidentified Organofluorine in a Coastal Watershed has Implications for River to Marine Ecosystems Active
A group of scientists investigated per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in watersheds on Cape Cod and identified a unique signature for aqueous film forming foams (AFFF) from legacy firefighting and fire training. A combination of statistical modeling and laboratory measurements indicates that unidentified organofluorine constitutes a large fraction of PFAS in the river systems that discharge to Waquoit Bay.
Water supplies for millions of people in the United States exceed Federal guidelines for perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), which are two compounds in a broad class of persistent human-made chemicals known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Major uses of PFAS include nonstick coatings on cookware, home textiles, food packaging, and as a component of aqueous film forming foams (AFFF) used in firefighting and fire training. PFAS enter watersheds through numerous pathways, including infiltration of AFFF through the unsaturated zone, industrial and domestic wastewater discharges to surface water, and septic system discharges to groundwater. The large number of compounds, variety of uses, and varying compositions of PFAS in use can make it difficult to identify PFAS origins.
An additional difficulty in identifying the origins of PFAS in a watershed is that the composition of PFAS changes as it moves through surface water and groundwater. Moreover, traditional laboratory methods are limited to a small fraction of the PFAS present in AFFF and environmental samples.
To address these limitations, scientists at the Harvard University John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) examined PFAS transport among six adjacent coastal watersheds (with well-characterized hydrology through previous USGS research efforts) on Cape Cod, Massachusetts during 2016–19. Laboratory methods, including analyses of 27 targeted PFAS, total oxidizable PFAS precursors, and total extractable organofluorine, were used along with unique multivariate clustering techniques to distinguish PFAS sources in natural waters and quantify movement of various forms of PFAS to coastal watersheds.
The scientists identified a distinct signature of AFFF in watersheds with an AFFF source compared to watersheds without an AFFF source. There were greater concentrations of the targeted PFAS and total oxidizable precursors in AFFF-affected watersheds compared to watersheds without known AFFF sources. The scientists also determined that only 24 to 63 percent of the extractable organofluorine can be explained by targeted PFAS and oxidizable precursors, indicating the presence of unidentified non-AFFF organofluorine sources in these coastal watersheds.
This study also indicated that legacy PFAS in slowly moving groundwater constitute a source to the downstream coastal environment. There can be a substantial lag between environmental PFAS release and discharge to the coastal environment in where groundwater is the predominant transport pathway. For example, legacy PFAS are still being observed in the Quashnet River that flows into a local estuary more than 20 years after the AFFF release at Joint Base Cape Cod indicating potential marine life exposure to PFAS at this site long after the original contamination.
This study was funded by the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences Superfund Research Program (P42ES027706) through the Sources, Transport, Exposure and Effects of PFAS (STEEP) Program led by the University of Rhode Island, with additional support by the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (ER18-1280). Support for Andrea Tokranov and Denis LeBlanc was provided by the Environmental Health Program (Toxic Substances Hydrology and Contaminant Biology) of the USGS Ecosystems Mission Area.
Reference
Ruyle, B. J., Pickard, H.M., LeBlanc, D.R., Tokranov, A.K.,Thackray, C.P., Hu, X.C., Vecitis, C.D., and Sunderland, E.M., 2021, Isolating the AFFF Signature in Coastal Watersheds Using Oxidizable PFAS Precursors and Unexplained Organofluoine, Environmental Science & Technology v. 55, pp. 3686-3695, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c07296.
Related Science listed below
Per-and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Integrated Science Team
Ecotoxicology and Ecological Risks of Per‐ and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Residential Tap Water: Source-to-Tap Science for Underserved Communities
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) detected in Source Waters and Treated Public Water Supplies
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances From Firefighting and Domestic Wastewater Remain in Groundwater for Decades
- Overview
A group of scientists investigated per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in watersheds on Cape Cod and identified a unique signature for aqueous film forming foams (AFFF) from legacy firefighting and fire training. A combination of statistical modeling and laboratory measurements indicates that unidentified organofluorine constitutes a large fraction of PFAS in the river systems that discharge to Waquoit Bay.
Water supplies for millions of people in the United States exceed Federal guidelines for perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), which are two compounds in a broad class of persistent human-made chemicals known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Major uses of PFAS include nonstick coatings on cookware, home textiles, food packaging, and as a component of aqueous film forming foams (AFFF) used in firefighting and fire training. PFAS enter watersheds through numerous pathways, including infiltration of AFFF through the unsaturated zone, industrial and domestic wastewater discharges to surface water, and septic system discharges to groundwater. The large number of compounds, variety of uses, and varying compositions of PFAS in use can make it difficult to identify PFAS origins.
An additional difficulty in identifying the origins of PFAS in a watershed is that the composition of PFAS changes as it moves through surface water and groundwater. Moreover, traditional laboratory methods are limited to a small fraction of the PFAS present in AFFF and environmental samples.
To address these limitations, scientists at the Harvard University John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) examined PFAS transport among six adjacent coastal watersheds (with well-characterized hydrology through previous USGS research efforts) on Cape Cod, Massachusetts during 2016–19. Laboratory methods, including analyses of 27 targeted PFAS, total oxidizable PFAS precursors, and total extractable organofluorine, were used along with unique multivariate clustering techniques to distinguish PFAS sources in natural waters and quantify movement of various forms of PFAS to coastal watersheds.
The scientists identified a distinct signature of AFFF in watersheds with an AFFF source compared to watersheds without an AFFF source. There were greater concentrations of the targeted PFAS and total oxidizable precursors in AFFF-affected watersheds compared to watersheds without known AFFF sources. The scientists also determined that only 24 to 63 percent of the extractable organofluorine can be explained by targeted PFAS and oxidizable precursors, indicating the presence of unidentified non-AFFF organofluorine sources in these coastal watersheds.
This study also indicated that legacy PFAS in slowly moving groundwater constitute a source to the downstream coastal environment. There can be a substantial lag between environmental PFAS release and discharge to the coastal environment in where groundwater is the predominant transport pathway. For example, legacy PFAS are still being observed in the Quashnet River that flows into a local estuary more than 20 years after the AFFF release at Joint Base Cape Cod indicating potential marine life exposure to PFAS at this site long after the original contamination.
This study was funded by the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences Superfund Research Program (P42ES027706) through the Sources, Transport, Exposure and Effects of PFAS (STEEP) Program led by the University of Rhode Island, with additional support by the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (ER18-1280). Support for Andrea Tokranov and Denis LeBlanc was provided by the Environmental Health Program (Toxic Substances Hydrology and Contaminant Biology) of the USGS Ecosystems Mission Area.
Reference
Ruyle, B. J., Pickard, H.M., LeBlanc, D.R., Tokranov, A.K.,Thackray, C.P., Hu, X.C., Vecitis, C.D., and Sunderland, E.M., 2021, Isolating the AFFF Signature in Coastal Watersheds Using Oxidizable PFAS Precursors and Unexplained Organofluoine, Environmental Science & Technology v. 55, pp. 3686-3695, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c07296.
- Science
Related Science listed below
Per-and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Integrated Science Team
Increasing scientific and public awareness of the widespread distribution of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in U.S. drinking-water supplies, aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, wildlife, and humans has raised many public health and resource management questions that U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) science can inform. The USGS Environmental Health Program's PFAS Integrated Science Team...Ecotoxicology and Ecological Risks of Per‐ and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances
Ecotoxicology and ecological risks of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances are summarized to highlight critical gaps and uncertainties, and to provide potential approaches to fill those gaps, including the development of targeted monitoring programs and cross-disciplinary approaches.Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Residential Tap Water: Source-to-Tap Science for Underserved Communities
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) were detected at low levels in treated drinking water samples from residential taps in the Greater Chicago Area. This study is part of a larger approach to provide an understanding of contaminant mixtures in residential tap water across the Nation including underserved communities in rural, urban, and tribal areas.Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) detected in Source Waters and Treated Public Water Supplies
This study, which measured 17 per- and polyfuoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in source and treated public water supplies from 25 drinking water facilities as part of a broader study of contaminants in drinking water across the United States, reports that PFASs were detected in all source water and public water supply samples collected. One sample exceeded the current U.S. Environmental Protection...Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances From Firefighting and Domestic Wastewater Remain in Groundwater for Decades
New study explores the persistence and transport of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) that originated from both firefighting and domestic wastewater sources. Although the fire training area and wastewater facility were decommissioned over 20 years ago, both sites continue to be sources of PFASs to groundwater.