February 2018 Danville, California Sequence Completed
The earthquake swarm near Danville had continued to taper off over the past week. Since Feb 23 there have only been two earthquakes in the sequence larger than magnitude 2.0, a magnitude 2.0 on Feb 27 and a magnitude 2.5 on Mar 1. The most likely scenario looking forward is for this sequence to continue to taper off.
Mon Feb 26, 8:00am PT
An earthquake swarm has been ongoing near Danville since February 16, starting with a magnitude 2.2 earthquake on 1:17 pm Pacific Time. As of Monday February 26 at 8:00am Pacific Time (PT), we have located 84 earthquakes greater than magnitude 1.0 since the sequence began. The two largest earthquakes in the sequence, with magnitudes 3.4 and 3.5, occurred 15 seconds apart at 12:19pm PT on February 23.There have been two other earthquakes greater than magnitude 3.0: a magnitude 3.0 on February 19th and a magnitude 3.3 at 5:28am PT on February 23rd.
A swarm sequence of earthquakes is different than a traditional mainshock-aftershock sequence in the distribution of magnitudes and timing of events. In a mainshock-aftershock sequence, the largest event typically is the first (or may be preceded by some small foreshocks), and then aftershocks occur afterwards in time. The largest number of aftershocks typically occur soon after the mainshock. In a swarm, however, several events of similar magnitude may occur close together in time or spread out over time, and there is no clear main event, or there may be several events of the largest magnitude. The earthquakes in the current sequence have been coming in bunches every day or so, with each burst of activity lasting a few hours.
Earthquake swarms are common in the San Ramon valley: similar swarms occurred in 2015, 2003, 2002, 1990, 1976, and 1970. These swarms are likely occurring on a complex zone of small faults that connect the Calaveras Fault to the Concord Fault in the vicinity of Danville. The length of these swarms ranges from 2 to 42 days; the number of M2.0+ earthquakes ranges from 12 to 177; and the largest event ranges from M3.5 (current sequence) to two M4.4 events. The statistics that we are currently observing for this event are very consistent with those from the previous events, indicating that this is typically behavior for a swarm in this region.
Comparison to Previous Swarms
| Swarm | # Earthquakes Magnitude ≥ 2.0 | Swarm Duration | Magnitude of Largest Earthquake | |
| First 14 Days | Total | |||
| 2018 Danville | 29* | 29* | 11 days* | ML 3.5* |
| 2015 San Ramon | 70 | 92 | 39 days | MW 3.6 |
| 2003 San Ramon | 12 | 12 | 2 days | MW 4.0 (x2) |
| 2002 San Ramon | 43 | 43 | 8 days | MW 3.9 |
| 1990 Alamo | 106 | 177 | 42 days | ML 4.4 (x2) |
| 1976 Danville | 58 | 59 | 24 days | ML 4.0 |
| 1970 Danville | 69 | 71 | 15 days | ML 3.8 |
* As of 7:30pm PT on Mar 5
Many of the events in this recent swarm have been felt throughout the San Ramon Valley and reported on the Did You Feel It? web page. The magnitude 3.5 earthquake had generated nearly 1500 responses as of 3pm on Friday, February 23rd.
There is always the potential for an earthquake swarm to trigger a much larger, damaging event, but this is rare. None of the previous swarms listed above did so (largest events in each swarm were less than M 4.5). Most large earthquakes are not preceded by swarms. Our current understanding and modeling of earthquake hazards and forecasts in the Bay Area already takes all of the previous swarm information into account, so the occurrence of these earthquakes does not change our understanding or forecast. In fact, these earthquakes simply reinforce our current models. There is a 72 percent probability (or likelihood) of at least one earthquake of magnitude 6.7 or greater striking somewhere in the San Francisco Bay region before 2043; on the Calaveras fault system the probability is 26 percent. This current sequence of earthquakes are a good reminder that we we live in Earthquake Country, so it is necessary to be prepared at all times, whether or not a swarm is ongoing.
- Overview
Mon Mar 5, 7:30pm PT
The earthquake swarm near Danville had continued to taper off over the past week. Since Feb 23 there have only been two earthquakes in the sequence larger than magnitude 2.0, a magnitude 2.0 on Feb 27 and a magnitude 2.5 on Mar 1. The most likely scenario looking forward is for this sequence to continue to taper off.
Mon Feb 26, 8:00am PT
An earthquake swarm has been ongoing near Danville since February 16, starting with a magnitude 2.2 earthquake on 1:17 pm Pacific Time. As of Monday February 26 at 8:00am Pacific Time (PT), we have located 84 earthquakes greater than magnitude 1.0 since the sequence began. The two largest earthquakes in the sequence, with magnitudes 3.4 and 3.5, occurred 15 seconds apart at 12:19pm PT on February 23.There have been two other earthquakes greater than magnitude 3.0: a magnitude 3.0 on February 19th and a magnitude 3.3 at 5:28am PT on February 23rd.
A swarm sequence of earthquakes is different than a traditional mainshock-aftershock sequence in the distribution of magnitudes and timing of events. In a mainshock-aftershock sequence, the largest event typically is the first (or may be preceded by some small foreshocks), and then aftershocks occur afterwards in time. The largest number of aftershocks typically occur soon after the mainshock. In a swarm, however, several events of similar magnitude may occur close together in time or spread out over time, and there is no clear main event, or there may be several events of the largest magnitude. The earthquakes in the current sequence have been coming in bunches every day or so, with each burst of activity lasting a few hours.
Earthquake swarms are common in the San Ramon valley: similar swarms occurred in 2015, 2003, 2002, 1990, 1976, and 1970. These swarms are likely occurring on a complex zone of small faults that connect the Calaveras Fault to the Concord Fault in the vicinity of Danville. The length of these swarms ranges from 2 to 42 days; the number of M2.0+ earthquakes ranges from 12 to 177; and the largest event ranges from M3.5 (current sequence) to two M4.4 events. The statistics that we are currently observing for this event are very consistent with those from the previous events, indicating that this is typically behavior for a swarm in this region.
Comparison to Previous Swarms
Swarm # Earthquakes Magnitude ≥ 2.0 Swarm Duration Magnitude of Largest Earthquake First 14 Days Total 2018 Danville 29* 29* 11 days* ML 3.5* 2015 San Ramon 70 92 39 days MW 3.6 2003 San Ramon 12 12 2 days MW 4.0 (x2) 2002 San Ramon 43 43 8 days MW 3.9 1990 Alamo 106 177 42 days ML 4.4 (x2) 1976 Danville 58 59 24 days ML 4.0 1970 Danville 69 71 15 days ML 3.8 * As of 7:30pm PT on Mar 5
Many of the events in this recent swarm have been felt throughout the San Ramon Valley and reported on the Did You Feel It? web page. The magnitude 3.5 earthquake had generated nearly 1500 responses as of 3pm on Friday, February 23rd.
There is always the potential for an earthquake swarm to trigger a much larger, damaging event, but this is rare. None of the previous swarms listed above did so (largest events in each swarm were less than M 4.5). Most large earthquakes are not preceded by swarms. Our current understanding and modeling of earthquake hazards and forecasts in the Bay Area already takes all of the previous swarm information into account, so the occurrence of these earthquakes does not change our understanding or forecast. In fact, these earthquakes simply reinforce our current models. There is a 72 percent probability (or likelihood) of at least one earthquake of magnitude 6.7 or greater striking somewhere in the San Francisco Bay region before 2043; on the Calaveras fault system the probability is 26 percent. This current sequence of earthquakes are a good reminder that we we live in Earthquake Country, so it is necessary to be prepared at all times, whether or not a swarm is ongoing.
Sources/Usage: Public Domain. View Media DetailsPlot of earthquakes with magnitudes greater than 2.0 within 15 km (10 miles) of the current earthquake sequence as a function of time over the past 30 years. (Public domain.)
Sources/Usage: Public Domain. View Media DetailsPlot of earthquakes in the current Danville earthquake sequence as a function of time. (Public domain.)