Due to a lapse in appropriations, the majority of USGS websites may not be up to date and may not reflect current conditions. Websites displaying real-time data, such as Earthquake and Water and information needed for public health and safety will be updated with limited support. Additionally, USGS will not be able to respond to inquiries until appropriations are enacted. For more information, please see www.doi.gov/shutdown
Wildlife Recovery Following the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill was Highly Variable Across Species
Thanks to a quarter-century of research and monitoring, scientists now know how different wildlife species were injured by the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill and how long it took for populations to recover.
This information may have important implications when responding to other oil spills, when conducting damage assessment studies after spills and when considering the environmental risks associated with extracting and shipping oil.
“Because wildlife species in the spill area vary so much in terms of what they eat, habitats that they use, and their ability to rebound after a drop in numbers, researchers saw huge differences in how long it took for populations to recover,” said Dan Esler, a Research Wildlife Biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey and lead author of a recently released paper on the subject. “Some species were barely affected, others such as bald eagles, rebounded quickly, and other species took much longer to recover, such as sea otters.”
In addition to differences in the time required for full recovery, USGS and collaborators from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon State University, and the North Gulf Oceanic Society identified ecological factors that affected the degree of injury:
- Species that foraged on invertebrates that occur in or on contaminated sediments were more likely to be affected by the oil spill than those that fed on fish or zooplankton in the water column.
- Species with low reproductive rates, such as orcas, have limited capacity to recover; in fact, orcas still have not returned to pre-spill numbers.
- Some population changes that were not related to the oil spill; for example, two species of seabirds, pigeon guillemots and marbled murrelets, may have been affected by oil exposure, but long-term analyses showed declines in numbers before and after the spill, probably related primarily to changing ocean conditions.
The USGS has previously led long-term studies of sea otters and harlequin ducks, two species that showed lack of recovery for over two decades after the spill. USGS Research Wildlife Biologist Dan Monson, noted “Sea otters were exposed to lingering oil in beach sediments long after shorelines appeared clean and oil exposure affected survival rates and population growth until at least the mid-2000s.”
The paper reviewing scientific studies of wildlife recovery, entitled “Timelines and mechanisms of wildlife population recovery following the Exxon Valdez oil spill” is available in the journal Deep Sea Research II, as part of a special issue focused on sources of ecological variability in the Gulf of Alaska.