Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

If there is a difference of opinion between an author and her/his chain of command in regard to adequacy of response to peer review or in regard to scientific/technical interpretation, what are the options/avenues available to the author? [046]

If there is a dispute between the author and her/his supervisor, Center Director, or others in her/his chain of command regarding the adequacy of peer review or scientific/technical interpretation, the author may contact the Director or Deputy Director of the OSQI for assistance with the resolution of the differences. The author may also contact the FSP Advisory Committee for advice. [Read more]

If there is a dispute between the author and her/his supervisor, Center Director, or others in her/his chain of command regarding the adequacy of peer review or scientific/technical interpretation, the author may contact the Director or Deputy Director of the OSQI for assistance with the resolution of the differences. The integrity of the USGS science is closely tied to the integrity of the scientific process. The OSQI is charged to monitor and enhance the integrity, quality, and health of USGS science. The OSQI will work with the author and others involved to find a suitable way to resolve the dispute. The author may also contact the FSP Advisory Committee (FSPAC; gs_fspac@usgs.gov) for advice. Emails sent to this address will reach all members of the FSPAC.