Marginalizing Bayesian population models - data for examples in the Grand Canyon region, southeastern Arizona, western Oregon USA - 1990-2015
March 22, 2020
These data were compiled here to fit various versions of Bayesian population models and compare their performance, primarily the time required to make inferences using different softwares and versions of code. The humpback chub data were collected by US Geological Survey and US Fish and Wildlife service in the Colorado and Little Colorado Rivers from April 2009 to October 2017. Adult fish were captured using hoop nets and electro-fishing, measured for total length and given individual marks using passive integrated transponders that were scanned when fish were recaptured. The other three datasets were collected by US Forest Service. Owl data for the N-occupancy model was collected between 1990 and 2015. Owl data for the two-species example was collected between 1990 and 2011. Both owl data sets were collected in a ~1000 km2 area in the Roseburg District of the Bureau of Land Management in western Oregon, USA. Owl vocalizations (vocal lures) were used to detect barred owl or spotted owl pairs in 158 survey polygons spread throughout the study area. The avian community occupancy data were collected from 1991 to 1995 across 92 sites in the Chiricahua Mountains of southeastern Arizona, USA. 149 species were detected through repeated point counts in each year.
Citation Information
Publication Year | 2020 |
---|---|
Title | Marginalizing Bayesian population models - data for examples in the Grand Canyon region, southeastern Arizona, western Oregon USA - 1990-2015 |
DOI | 10.5066/P9JN5C0L |
Authors | Charles B Yackulic, Maria C Dzul, Jane A Reid, Jamie S. Sanderlin, William M. Block, Joseph L. Ganey, Michael J Dodrill, Mike D Yard |
Product Type | Data Release |
Record Source | USGS Asset Identifier Service (AIS) |
USGS Organization | Southwest Biological Science Center - Flagstaff, AZ, Headquarters |
Rights | This work is marked with CC0 1.0 Universal |
Related
A need for speed in Bayesian population models: A practical guide to marginalizing and recovering discrete latent states
Bayesian population models can be exceedingly slow due, in part, to the choice to simulate discrete latent states. Here, we discuss an alternative approach to discrete latent states, marginalization, that forms the basis of maximum likelihood population models and is much faster. Our manuscript has two goals: 1) to introduce readers unfamiliar with marginalization to the concept and...
Authors
Charles B. Yackulic, Michael J. Dodrill, Maria C. Dzul, Jamie S. Sanderlin, Janice A. Reid
Charles B Yackulic, Ph.D.
Research Statistician
Research Statistician
Email
Phone
Maria C Dzul, PhD
Biologist
Biologist
Email
Related
A need for speed in Bayesian population models: A practical guide to marginalizing and recovering discrete latent states
Bayesian population models can be exceedingly slow due, in part, to the choice to simulate discrete latent states. Here, we discuss an alternative approach to discrete latent states, marginalization, that forms the basis of maximum likelihood population models and is much faster. Our manuscript has two goals: 1) to introduce readers unfamiliar with marginalization to the concept and...
Authors
Charles B. Yackulic, Michael J. Dodrill, Maria C. Dzul, Jamie S. Sanderlin, Janice A. Reid
Charles B Yackulic, Ph.D.
Research Statistician
Research Statistician
Email
Phone
Maria C Dzul, PhD
Biologist
Biologist
Email