Porphyry copper deposits are the subject of a large volume of literature indicating that controversy still reigns as to which model or combination of models explains their origin, and yet, over 70 years ago we reached agreement that the well-documented space-time relationship between the deposits and calc-alkaline plutons indicates a genetic tie between them. This genetic tie is generally assumed to indicate a causitive role for an exposed or nearby hidden pluton. There are many variants, but the two end-member models that incorporate this causitive assumption are the meteoric water model and the orthomagmatic model. It is my opinion that the controversy originates from use of indirect data and variant models to explain new observational data and experimental studies that threaten the survival of the basic end-member models. One of many examples of this is the end-stage magmatic evolution of chlorine-rich water required of the orthomagmatic model. This evolution is required because the low copper content of calc-alkaline plutons demands a large source magma, that, because it generally is not visible, has to be buried. Additionally, much of the ore minerals in porphyry deposits is along fractures. Both conditions require transportation of the ore components from the magma, and to transport enough ore components, given the limited amount of water soluble in a melt and the low solubility of base-metal sulfides in water without benefit of chloride complexing, we required of the original Lindgren magmatic model that the source pluton produced chloride-rich water. However, we did not investigate the rocks associated with deposits to substantiate the hypothesis. We went to the laboratory and found that sufficient water and chlorine could be dissolved in silicate melt in a gold capsule in a high-pressure high-temperature bomb to allow postulation of sufficient water and chlorine in the stocks associated with porphyry deposits; in other words, we invested in indirect rather than direct studies.
