Tag loss can bias Jolly-Seber capture-recapture estimates
We identified cases where the Jolly-Seber estimator of population size is biased under tag loss and tag-induced mortality by examining the mathematical arguments and performing computer simulations. We found that, except under certain tag-loss models and high sample sizes, the population size estimators (uncorrected for tag loss) are severely biased high when tag loss or tag-induced mortality occurs. Our findings verify that this misconception about effects of tag loss and tag-induced mortality could have serious consequences for field biologists interested in population size. Reiterating common sense, we encourage those engaged in capture-recapture studies to be careful and humane when handling animals during tagging, to use tags with high retention rates, to double-tag animals when possible, and to strive for the highest capture probabilities possible.
Citation Information
| Publication Year | 2003 |
|---|---|
| Title | Tag loss can bias Jolly-Seber capture-recapture estimates |
| Authors | T. McDonald, Steven Amstrup, B.F.J. Manly |
| Publication Type | Article |
| Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
| Series Title | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
| Index ID | 70025211 |
| Record Source | USGS Publications Warehouse |