Paul Flint, Ph.D. (Former Employee)
Science and Products
Filter Total Items: 18
No Result Found
Filter Total Items: 136
The adaptive significance of hatching synchrony of waterfowl eggs The adaptive significance of hatching synchrony of waterfowl eggs
We estimated the amount of incubation time that first laid Black Brent eggs received before completion of the clutch. First laid eggs received up to 48 hours of incubation before the last egg was laid in Brent clutches. Waterfowl clutches usually hatch within a period of 24 hours, suggesting that some mechanism reduces developmental asynchrony during incubation. The combination of...
Authors
Paul L. Flint, Mark S. Lindberg, Margaret C. MacCluskie, James S. Sedinger
Reproductive implications of egg-size variation in Black Brant Reproductive implications of egg-size variation in Black Brant
We analyzed variation in egg size of Black Brant (Branta bernicla nigricans) in relation to clutch size, laying date, female age, year, and position in the laying sequence. A total of 3,478 eggs was measured over three years. Egg size increased with clutch size and female age, and decreased with laying date, year, and position in the laying sequence. We did not detect a negative...
Authors
Paul L. Flint, James S. Sedinger
Arctic fox control improves nest success of black brant Arctic fox control improves nest success of black brant
No abstract available.
Authors
R. Michael Anthony, Paul L. Flint, J.S. Sedinger
Growth rate is negatively correlated with hatch date in Black Brant Growth rate is negatively correlated with hatch date in Black Brant
Arctic geese nest in a highly seasonal environment in which ungrazed plants reach peak nitrogen concentrations when goslings hatch (Sedinger and Raveling 1986). Grazing by geese prolongs peak nutrient concentrations but reduces food availability. This should cause nutrient availability to decline seasonally. Here, we test the hypothesis that late-hatching goslings of Black Brant (Branta...
Authors
James S. Sedinger, Paul L. Flint
Science and Products
Filter Total Items: 18
No Result Found
Filter Total Items: 136
The adaptive significance of hatching synchrony of waterfowl eggs The adaptive significance of hatching synchrony of waterfowl eggs
We estimated the amount of incubation time that first laid Black Brent eggs received before completion of the clutch. First laid eggs received up to 48 hours of incubation before the last egg was laid in Brent clutches. Waterfowl clutches usually hatch within a period of 24 hours, suggesting that some mechanism reduces developmental asynchrony during incubation. The combination of...
Authors
Paul L. Flint, Mark S. Lindberg, Margaret C. MacCluskie, James S. Sedinger
Reproductive implications of egg-size variation in Black Brant Reproductive implications of egg-size variation in Black Brant
We analyzed variation in egg size of Black Brant (Branta bernicla nigricans) in relation to clutch size, laying date, female age, year, and position in the laying sequence. A total of 3,478 eggs was measured over three years. Egg size increased with clutch size and female age, and decreased with laying date, year, and position in the laying sequence. We did not detect a negative...
Authors
Paul L. Flint, James S. Sedinger
Arctic fox control improves nest success of black brant Arctic fox control improves nest success of black brant
No abstract available.
Authors
R. Michael Anthony, Paul L. Flint, J.S. Sedinger
Growth rate is negatively correlated with hatch date in Black Brant Growth rate is negatively correlated with hatch date in Black Brant
Arctic geese nest in a highly seasonal environment in which ungrazed plants reach peak nitrogen concentrations when goslings hatch (Sedinger and Raveling 1986). Grazing by geese prolongs peak nutrient concentrations but reduces food availability. This should cause nutrient availability to decline seasonally. Here, we test the hypothesis that late-hatching goslings of Black Brant (Branta...
Authors
James S. Sedinger, Paul L. Flint
*Disclaimer: Listing outside positions with professional scientific organizations on this Staff Profile are for informational purposes only and do not constitute an endorsement of those professional scientific organizations or their activities by the USGS, Department of the Interior, or U.S. Government