Soil surface properties and roughness data at two experimental restoration sites within the Southwestern USA
September 14, 2021
This data release presents data used for analyzing spatial and temporal differences in soil surface roughness within selected biocrust communities. These records were collected by ground-based lidar for 121, 1m x 3m soil plots with biological soil crusts (biocrusts). Roughness was estimated from 5 mm resolution data (CloudCompare v. 2.10.2, 2019) for two Great Basin Desert sites (UTTR-1; UTTR-2) in December 2015 and one Chihuahuan Desert site (JER) in February 2016. Data were again collected in June 2018 for UTTR-1 and UTTR-2. Additional field and laboratory data were included within this study to understand differences in soil surface roughness between UTTR and JER as well as between the 2016 and 2018 surveys at UTTR. The associated manuscript (see Larger Work Citation) reports that soil surfaces at the UTTR are significantly rougher than JER for undisturbed biocrust but not necessarily for disturbed biocrust. Additionaly, discuss that once biocrust is disturbed, soil surface roughness can increase with biocrust recovery. These data can be further used to represent surface conditions at the time of collection at individual soil plots within both study areas, providing further information on spatial and temporal variability in roughness as well as other field and laboratory parameters included in this release.
Citation Information
| Publication Year | 2021 |
|---|---|
| Title | Soil surface properties and roughness data at two experimental restoration sites within the Southwestern USA |
| DOI | 10.5066/P9CNLJ25 |
| Authors | Joshua J Caster, Temuulen Tsagaan Sankey, Joel B Sankey, Matthew A. Bowker, Daniel D Buscombe, Michael C Duniway, Nichole Barger, Taylor Joyal, Jessica D. Mikenas |
| Product Type | Data Release |
| Record Source | USGS Asset Identifier Service (AIS) |
| USGS Organization | Southwest Biological Science Center - Flagstaff, AZ, Headquarters |
| Rights | This work is marked with CC0 1.0 Universal |
Related
Biocrust and the soil surface: Influence of climate, disturbance, and biocrust recovery on soil surface roughness
Biocrust communities promote soil surface roughness, a key functional characteristic for soil ecology. However, the spatial scales at which biocrust communities contribute to surface roughness are not well understood. To refine our understanding of the spatial dynamics between biocrust and soil surface roughness, we used mm-resolution terrestrial LiDAR to measure micro-topographic...
Authors
Joshua J. Caster, Temuulen T. Sankey, Joel B. Sankey, Matthew A. Bowker, Daniel Buscombe, Michael C. Duniway, Nichole Barger, Akasha M. Faist, Taylor Joyal
Mike Duniway, Ph.D.
Research Ecologist & Soil Scientist
Research Ecologist & Soil Scientist
Email
Phone
Related
Biocrust and the soil surface: Influence of climate, disturbance, and biocrust recovery on soil surface roughness
Biocrust communities promote soil surface roughness, a key functional characteristic for soil ecology. However, the spatial scales at which biocrust communities contribute to surface roughness are not well understood. To refine our understanding of the spatial dynamics between biocrust and soil surface roughness, we used mm-resolution terrestrial LiDAR to measure micro-topographic...
Authors
Joshua J. Caster, Temuulen T. Sankey, Joel B. Sankey, Matthew A. Bowker, Daniel Buscombe, Michael C. Duniway, Nichole Barger, Akasha M. Faist, Taylor Joyal
Mike Duniway, Ph.D.
Research Ecologist & Soil Scientist
Research Ecologist & Soil Scientist
Email
Phone