Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Editors are editors, not oracles

October 17, 2014

Farji-Brener and Kitzberger (2014; hereafter FBK) resurrect the issues of Farji-Brener (2007) concerning manuscripts that are submitted to journals but that are not sent out for peer review: a process we call “reject following editorial review” (RFER). We thank FBK for reviving discussion about this important topic as new challenges, including new publication outlets, peer-review models, and an increasingly complex and voluminous scientific literature, are emerging across the publication landscape. While we disagree with FBK's perspective and conclusions, we recognize that this discussion can help to improve editorial and publication processes, and we welcome the opportunity to inform the ecological community about the current status of editorial practice at ESA journals.

Publication Year 2014
Title Editors are editors, not oracles
DOI 10.1890/0012-9623-95.4.342
Authors Dave Schimel, Donald R. Strong, Aaron M. Ellison, Debra P. C. Peters, Sue Silver, Edward A. Johnson, Jayne Belnap, Aimee T. Classen, Timothy E. Essington, Andrew O. Finley, Brian D. Inouye, Emily H. Stanley
Publication Type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Series Title Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America
Index ID 70129169
Record Source USGS Publications Warehouse
USGS Organization Coop Res Unit Seattle