Land Cover Assignments of 300 locations in the Pacific Northwest in 2000
November 29, 2021
Area estimates of land cover and land cover change are often based on reference class labels determined by analysts interpreting satellite imagery and aerial photography. Different interpreters may assign different reference class labels to the same sample unit. This dataset include land cover attributes for the year 2000 assigned by 7 image analysts, working independently of each other, to a set of 300 sample locations from a region of the Pacific Northwest of the United States. This data was used in an evaluation of the impact of interpreter variability on variance estimation.
Citation Information
| Publication Year | 2021 |
|---|---|
| Title | Land Cover Assignments of 300 locations in the Pacific Northwest in 2000 |
| DOI | 10.5066/P9HEE6VK |
| Authors | Bruce Pengra (CTR), Steve V. Stehman, Todd A Schroeder (CTR), Roger F Auch, Devendra Dahal (CTR), Nicholas Daniels, Daryn J Dockter (CTR), Mark Hammond, Ian W. Houseman, Jennifer L. Lecker, Zhiqiang Yang |
| Product Type | Data Release |
| Record Source | USGS Asset Identifier Service (AIS) |
| USGS Organization | Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center |
| Rights | This work is marked with CC0 1.0 Universal |
Related
Incorporating interpreter variability into estimation of the total variance of land cover area estimates under simple random sampling
Area estimates of land cover and land cover change are often based on reference class labels determined by analysts interpreting satellite imagery and aerial photography. Different interpreters may assign different reference class labels to the same sample unit. This interpreter variability is typically not accounted for in variance estimators applied to area estimates of land cover. A simple meas
Authors
Stephen V. Stehman, John Mousoupetros, Ronald E. McRoberts, Erik Naesset, Bruce Pengra, Dingfan Xing, Josephine Horton
Related
Incorporating interpreter variability into estimation of the total variance of land cover area estimates under simple random sampling
Area estimates of land cover and land cover change are often based on reference class labels determined by analysts interpreting satellite imagery and aerial photography. Different interpreters may assign different reference class labels to the same sample unit. This interpreter variability is typically not accounted for in variance estimators applied to area estimates of land cover. A simple meas
Authors
Stephen V. Stehman, John Mousoupetros, Ronald E. McRoberts, Erik Naesset, Bruce Pengra, Dingfan Xing, Josephine Horton