The Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale

Science Center Objects

  

The effect of an earthquake on the Earth's surface is called the intensity. The intensity scale consists of a series of certain key responses such as people awakening, movement of furniture, damage to chimneys, and finally - total destruction. Although numerousintensity scales have been developed over the last several hundred years to evaluate the effects of earthquakes, the one currently used in the United States is the Modified Mercalli (MM) Intensity Scale. It was developed in 1931 by the American seismologists Harry Wood and Frank Neumann. This scale, composed of increasing levels of intensity that range from imperceptible shaking to catastrophic destruction, is designated by Roman numerals. It does not have a mathematical basis; instead it is an arbitrary ranking based on observed effects.

The Modified Mercalli Intensity value assigned to a specific site after an earthquake has a more meaningful measure of severity to the nonscientist than the magnitude because intensity refers to the effects actually experienced at that place.

The lower numbers of the intensity scale generally deal with the manner in which the earthquake is felt by people. The higher numbers of the scale are based on observed structural damage. Structural engineers usually contribute information for assigning intensity values of VIII or above.

Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale

Abbreviated description of the levels of Modified Mercalli intensity. (Public domain.)

Abridged from The Severity of an Earthquake, USGS General Interest Publication 1989-288-913

History and Details of MMI

The following is an excerpt from Intensity Distribution and Isoseismal Maps for the Northridge, California, Earthquake of January 17,1994.

The intensity of an earthquake at a location is a number that characterizes the severity of ground shaking at that location by considering the effects ofthe shaking on people, on manmade structures, and on the landscape.

Intensities assigned by the U. S. Geological Survey and (prior to 1973) by agencies in the U. S. Department of Commerce have for many decades been based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale of 1931 (Wood and Neumann, 1931), which we usually refer to simply as the "Modified Mercalli" or "MM" scale. The scale lists criteria that permit the seismologist to represent the severity of ground shaking in a community or part of a community by a number. Experience with the MM scale in the decades since 1931 has shown that some criteria are more reliable than others as indicators of the level of ground shaking. Moreover, construction methods have changed appreciably since the scale was introduced. Assigning of MM intensity values therefore involves use of the original criteria of Wood and Neumann (1931) with amendments and modifications that have been developed in the decades since 1931.

...

The Modified Mercalli scale is given as originally abridged by Wood and Neumann (1931) ... the unabridged scale is reproduced in Stover and Coffman (1993). ... Since 1931 ithas become clear that many phenomena that Wood and Neumann (1931) originally used as criteria to define the highest Modified Mercalli intensities (X and above) are related less to the level of ground shaking than to the presence of ground conditions susceptible to spectacular failure or to the ease with which seismic faulting of different style and depth can propagate to the ground surface. Criteria based on such phenomena are downweighted now in assigning of USGS intensities (Stover and Coffman, 1993).

References

  • Dewey, James, B. Glen Reagor, L. Dengler, K. Moley (1995). Intensity Distribution and Isoseismal Maps for the Northridge, California, Earthquake of January 17,1994, USGS Open-File Report 95-92.
  • Stover, C. W., and Coffman, J. L. (1993). Seismicity of the United States, 1568-1989 (Revised): U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1527, 418 p.
  • Wood, H. O., and Neumann, Frank (1931). Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale of 1931: Seismological Society of America Bulletin, v. 21, no. 4, p. 277-283.