Most investigators generally agree that the conditions for producing earthquakes by fluid injection through wells and by reservoir construction are (1) the presence of an underlying rock that is stressed to the verge of fracturing by tectonic stresses and (or) is on the brink of sliding on pre-existing fault planes, (2) the presence of potentially active faults(s), and (3) an increase of pore pressure in the rock caused by fluid injection or seepage from reservoir (s), which is probably the triggering force. The mechanism of disposal of radioactive wastes in shale by grout injection and hydraulic fracturing, which has been used at ORNL (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tenn.) is different from injection of fluid. The injected grout is in its liquid phase only during the injection period and, it is to be hoped, is confined in the hydraulically induced bedding-plane fractures. The grout is then allowed to solidify under pressure after termination of the injection, and, after solidification, it becomes an integral part of the shale. Significant characteristics of the disposal method and the site are as follows: (1) Because of the low permeability of shale and high viscosity of the injection grout, pore pressure in the rock, beyond the region of induced fractures, does not increase due to the injections; the injected grout enters newly formed bedding-plane fractures, (2) the injection site is free of local faults and of major interconnected joints and fractures; accordingly, injected grout in its liquid state is expected to be confined principally in the induced nearly horizontal bedding-plane fractures, and (3) due to low tensile strength along shale bedding planes, the energy needed to induce bedding-plane fractures is small; experiments made at ORNL indicate that the energy released during hydraulic fracturing in shale is so small that seismic signals generated by grout injections cannot be differentiated from ambient ground vibrations. In view of the fact 'that an increase of pore pressure in rock (the triggering force) and association with potentially active fault (s) do not occur at the proposed site at ORNL and that the disposal method does not produce an increase in pore pressure, it can reasonably be concluded that neither the method nor the site has the characteristics for triggering earthquakes during and after grout injections.
