Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Rehabilitating sea otters: Feeling good versus being effective

December 1, 2017

This chapter examines the complexities of assessing the merits and drawbacks of wildlife rehabilitation. Wildlife rehabilitation is often costly, and the resulting benefits differ depending on whether one’s interest is in the welfare of individual animals or conserving populations. Two examples of this dilemma include the rehabilitation of oiled sea otters following the Exxon Valdez spill in Prince William Sound, Alaska, and the rehabilitation of stranded sea otter pups in central California. In the first example, substantial financial investment resulted in little or no benefits for population conservation. In the second example, the potential for population-level benefits is context dependent: in populations near carrying capacity the conservation impacts are negligible, whereas in isolated, low-density populations rehabilitation and release can be an effective conservation tool. Wildlife rehabilitation is valued by people for various reasons, but recognizing and acknowledging the difference between individual and population welfare is an important step toward effective wildlife conservation.

Publication Year 2017
Title Rehabilitating sea otters: Feeling good versus being effective
DOI 10.1093/oso/9780198808978.003.0020
Authors James A. Estes, M. Tim Tinker
Publication Type Book Chapter
Publication Subtype Book Chapter
Index ID 70191869
Record Source USGS Publications Warehouse
USGS Organization Western Ecological Research Center