Short-term survival of lake whitefish following surgical implantation of acoustic transmitters using chemical anesthesia and electroimmobilization

The recreational, tribal, and commercial importance of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) has prompted interest in conducting large-scale telemetry studies to evaluate movement patterns, stock structure, and spatial distribution of fish relative to fishing effort in the Laurentian Great Lakes. However, there is a lack of knowledge concerning the postoperative effects of intracoelomic transmitter implantation and the use of different anesthetic agents and immobilization techniques during surgery on the survival of lake whitefish. Consequently, we evaluated 48-h survival of lake whitefish following intracoelomic implantation of acoustic transmitters using chemical anesthesia (i.e., Aqui-S 20E®) and electroimmobilization through a series of field surgery trials during November 2016 and 2017. Lake whitefish were collected using electrofishing and assigned to treatment groups including: 1) a loop tag; 2) a loop tag and acoustic transmitter with no anesthesia or immobilization; 3) a loop tag and transmitter using Aqui-S 20E®; 4) a loop tag and transmitter using electroimmobilization; and 5) reference fish. In treatments involving anesthesia or immobilization, induction and recovery times were recorded, and all fish were monitored for postoperative mortality. After 48 h, all fish that underwent anesthesia or immobilization during surgery were alive, but 4 of 25 (16%) fish that underwent surgery without anesthesia or immobilization died within 48 h. Induction and recovery times were substantially shorter for fish immobilized with electricity (induction time: instantaneous; recovery time < 20 s) than for those anesthetized with Aqui-S 20E® (induction time > 200 s; recovery time > 500 s). Results indicate that survival of lake whitefish following surgical implantation of acoustic transmitters was high when surgeries were conducted with Aqui-S 20E® or electroimmobilization. Compared to using Aqui-S 20E®, electroimmobilization can provide shorter induction and recovery times and may be a preferred option for field-based tagging activities with limitations on time and fish holding capacity.