Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Strategic Grassland Bird Conservation throughout the annual cycle: Linking policy alternatives, landowner decisions, and biological population outcomes

November 16, 2015

Grassland bird habitat has declined substantially in the United States. Remaining grasslands are increasingly fragmented, mostly privately owned, and vary greatly in terms of habitat quality and protection status. A coordinated strategic response for grassland bird conservation is difficult, largely due to the scope and complexity of the problem, further compounded by biological, sociological, and economic uncertainties. We describe the results from a collaborative Structured Decision Making (SDM) workshop focused on linking social and economic drivers of landscape change to grassland bird population outcomes. We identified and evaluated alternative strategies for grassland bird conservation using a series of rapid prototype models. We modeled change in grassland and agriculture cover in hypothetical landscapes resulting from different landowner decisions in response to alternative socio-economic conservation policy decisions. Resulting changes in land cover at all three stages of the annual cycle (breeding, wintering, and migration) were used to estimate changes in grassland bird populations. Our results suggest that successful grassland bird conservation may depend upon linkages with ecosystem services on working agricultural lands and grassland-based marketing campaigns to engage the public. With further development, spatial models that link landowner decisions with biological outcomes can be essential tools for making conservation policy decisions. A coordinated non-traditional partnership will likely be necessary to clearly understand and systematically respond to the many conservation challenges facing grassland birds.

Publication Year 2015
Title Strategic Grassland Bird Conservation throughout the annual cycle: Linking policy alternatives, landowner decisions, and biological population outcomes
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0142525
Authors Ryan G. Drum, Christine Ribic, Katie Koch, Eric V. Lonsdorf, Edward C. Grant, Marissa Ahlering, Laurel M. Barnhill, Thomas Dailey, Socheata Lor, Connie Mueller, D.C. Pavlacky, Catherine Rideout, David W. Sample
Publication Type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Series Title PLoS ONE
Index ID 70173532
Record Source USGS Publications Warehouse
USGS Organization Coop Res Unit Leetown