Susan E. Hough
Susan Hough is a scientist in the Earthquake Hazards Program.
Science and Products
Filter Total Items: 127
Reply to, “Comment on ‘The 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake: Relic railroad offset reveals rupture,’ by Roger Bilham and Susan E. Hough” Reply to, “Comment on ‘The 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake: Relic railroad offset reveals rupture,’ by Roger Bilham and Susan E. Hough”
We welcome this opportunity to respond to Pratt et al. (2024) (hereinafter P24). Bilham and Hough (2023) proposed a “first-cut” elastic deformation model for the 1886 earthquake, a quantitative source model constrained by identified coseismic constraints. A key observation was the measurement of a lateral offset of a railroad line south of Summerville, leading to a model with...
Authors
Roger Bilham, Susan E. Hough
On algorithmically determined versus traditional macroseismic intensity assignments On algorithmically determined versus traditional macroseismic intensity assignments
The utility of macroseismic data, defined as the effects of earthquakes on humans and the built environment, has been increasingly recognized following the advent of online systems that now produce unprecedented volumes of macroseismic intensity information. Contributed reports from the U.S. Geological Survey “Did You Feel It?” (DYFI) system (Wald et al., 1999) are used to generate...
Authors
Susan E. Hough
The 17 January 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake: A retrospective analysis The 17 January 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake: A retrospective analysis
The 17 January 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake was a watershed event, with far-reaching societal and scientific impacts. The earthquake, which occurred in the early days of both broadband seismic networks and the Internet, spurred advances in seismic monitoring, real-time systems, and development of data products. Motivated by the 30th anniversary of the earthquake, we present a...
Authors
Susan E. Hough, Robert Graves, Elizabeth S. Cochran, Clara Yoon, James Luke Blair, Scott Haefner, David J. Wald, Vince Quitoriano
Static and dynamic strain in the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake Static and dynamic strain in the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake
During the 1886 Mw 7.3 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake, three railroads emanating from the city were exposed to severe shaking. Expansion joints in segmented railroad tracks are designed to allow railroad infrastructure to withstand a few parts in 10,000 of thermoelastic strain. We show that, in 1886, transient contractions exceeding this limiting value buckled rails, and...
Authors
Roger Bilham, Susan E. Hough
On the provenance of field reports of the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake: A seismo-historical whodunnit On the provenance of field reports of the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake: A seismo-historical whodunnit
Much of what is known about the effects of the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake throughout the epicentral region can be attributed to meticulous field investigations by an individual with training in geology and engineering, Earle Sloan (Clendenin, 1926). In a recent study, Bilham and Hough (2024) undertook a detailed analysis of the effects of the earthquake on railroads in...
Authors
Susan E. Hough, Roger Bilham
Why do seismic hazard models worldwide appear to overpredict historical intensity observations? Why do seismic hazard models worldwide appear to overpredict historical intensity observations?
Probabilistic seismic hazard assessments (PSHAs) provide the scientific basis for building codes to reduce damage from earthquakes. Despite their substantial impact, little is known about how well PSHA predicts actual shaking. Recent PSHA for California, Japan, Italy, Nepal, and France appear to consistently overpredict historically observed earthquake shaking intensities. Numerical...
Authors
Leah Marschall Salditch, Molly M. Gallahue, Seth Stein, James S. Neely, Norman A. Abrahamson, Susan E. Hough
Science and Products
Filter Total Items: 127
Reply to, “Comment on ‘The 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake: Relic railroad offset reveals rupture,’ by Roger Bilham and Susan E. Hough” Reply to, “Comment on ‘The 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake: Relic railroad offset reveals rupture,’ by Roger Bilham and Susan E. Hough”
We welcome this opportunity to respond to Pratt et al. (2024) (hereinafter P24). Bilham and Hough (2023) proposed a “first-cut” elastic deformation model for the 1886 earthquake, a quantitative source model constrained by identified coseismic constraints. A key observation was the measurement of a lateral offset of a railroad line south of Summerville, leading to a model with...
Authors
Roger Bilham, Susan E. Hough
On algorithmically determined versus traditional macroseismic intensity assignments On algorithmically determined versus traditional macroseismic intensity assignments
The utility of macroseismic data, defined as the effects of earthquakes on humans and the built environment, has been increasingly recognized following the advent of online systems that now produce unprecedented volumes of macroseismic intensity information. Contributed reports from the U.S. Geological Survey “Did You Feel It?” (DYFI) system (Wald et al., 1999) are used to generate...
Authors
Susan E. Hough
The 17 January 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake: A retrospective analysis The 17 January 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake: A retrospective analysis
The 17 January 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake was a watershed event, with far-reaching societal and scientific impacts. The earthquake, which occurred in the early days of both broadband seismic networks and the Internet, spurred advances in seismic monitoring, real-time systems, and development of data products. Motivated by the 30th anniversary of the earthquake, we present a...
Authors
Susan E. Hough, Robert Graves, Elizabeth S. Cochran, Clara Yoon, James Luke Blair, Scott Haefner, David J. Wald, Vince Quitoriano
Static and dynamic strain in the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake Static and dynamic strain in the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake
During the 1886 Mw 7.3 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake, three railroads emanating from the city were exposed to severe shaking. Expansion joints in segmented railroad tracks are designed to allow railroad infrastructure to withstand a few parts in 10,000 of thermoelastic strain. We show that, in 1886, transient contractions exceeding this limiting value buckled rails, and...
Authors
Roger Bilham, Susan E. Hough
On the provenance of field reports of the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake: A seismo-historical whodunnit On the provenance of field reports of the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake: A seismo-historical whodunnit
Much of what is known about the effects of the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake throughout the epicentral region can be attributed to meticulous field investigations by an individual with training in geology and engineering, Earle Sloan (Clendenin, 1926). In a recent study, Bilham and Hough (2024) undertook a detailed analysis of the effects of the earthquake on railroads in...
Authors
Susan E. Hough, Roger Bilham
Why do seismic hazard models worldwide appear to overpredict historical intensity observations? Why do seismic hazard models worldwide appear to overpredict historical intensity observations?
Probabilistic seismic hazard assessments (PSHAs) provide the scientific basis for building codes to reduce damage from earthquakes. Despite their substantial impact, little is known about how well PSHA predicts actual shaking. Recent PSHA for California, Japan, Italy, Nepal, and France appear to consistently overpredict historically observed earthquake shaking intensities. Numerical...
Authors
Leah Marschall Salditch, Molly M. Gallahue, Seth Stein, James S. Neely, Norman A. Abrahamson, Susan E. Hough