Located in the northern Mojave Desert, the Indian Wells Valley has an arid environment, receiving only 4-6 inches of precipitation annually. Like most desert areas, Indian Wells Valley communities rely mostly on groundwater for their available groundwater supply. Increases in urban and agricultural development have resulted in increased groundwater pumpage for public and agricultural use, causing large water-level declines throughout the valley. Understanding the rate and amounts of natural groundwater recharge in the Indian Wells Valley is important to developing resource-management plans for the groundwater basin and the communities that depend on it.
The Indian Wells Valley is located in the northern Mojave Desert and it has an arid environment, receiving only 4-6 inches of precipitation annually. Like most desert areas, Indian Wells Valley communities rely mostly on groundwater for their available groundwater supply. Increases in urban and agricultural development have resulted in increased groundwater pumpage for public and agricultural use, causing large water-level declines throughout the valley. The USGS California Basin Characterization Model (BCM) (Flint and others, 2013) was used in a revised form to understand the rate and amounts of natural groundwater recharge in the Indian Wells Valley and to refine historical estimates of groundwater recharge in the valley. Results from this study provide validation of recharge estimates from multiple sources representing parts of the water balance, including variables such as potential and actual evapotranspiration, and streamflow measurements, and are used to evaluate historical and future patterns of natural recharge in the valley.
Development of a Monthly Dataset of Historical (1981-2010) and 3 Projected Futures (2011-2099) for Climate and Hydrology for Indian Wells Valley, CA
The Indian Wells Valley BCM was developed on a monthly time step at a spatial resolution of 270 square meters (m2) with a model domain that includes the 10 sub-watersheds that surround and drain into the Indian Wells Valley (fig. 1). The BCM used historical climate data from 1981-2010, and 3 future climate projections to develop hydrologic output for the study area such as recharge, runoff, and climatic water deficit. Model inputs include topography, soil properties, and geology datasets, which are static with time; monthly gridded precipitation and temperature datasets; and monthly gridded potential evapotranspiration (PET) (Flint and others, 2013).
The Indian Wells Valley BCM was calibrated to 10 watersheds (table 1) to provide recharge, runoff and climatic water deficit estimates for current and future climate conditions following methods in Flint and others (2013) and Flint and Flint (2012).
Site Name | USGS Site Number | Agency |
---|---|---|
South Fork Kern River near Olancha, CA | 11188200 | USGS |
Cottonwood Creek near Cantil, CA | 10264770 | USGS |
Ninemile Creek near Brown, CA | 10264878 | USGS |
Little Lake Creek near Little Lake, CA | 10264870 | USGS |
Goler Culch near Randsburg, CA | 10264710 | USGS |
Darwin Wash near Darwin, CA | 10250800 | USGS |
Wildrose Creek near Wildrose Station, CA | 10250600 | USGS |
South Fork Kern River near Onyx, CA | 11189500 | USGS |
Sand Canyon Creek | --- | Kern County Water Agency |
Grapevine Canyon Creek | --- | Kern County Water Agency |
Table 2 shows previous estimates of recharge to the principal aquifer of the Indian Wells Valley. The table shows that local calibration results of the BCM model for the time period 1981-2010 correspond very well to previous recorded estimates, providing an independent approach that corroborates the general average annual estimate of approximately 8,700 acre-feet/year.
Data Source | Surface Drainage (acre-feet/year) | Inflow from Rose Valley (acre-feet/year) |
Total Natural Recharge (acre-feet/year) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sierra Nevada | Coso Range | Argus Range | El Paso Mountains | Volcanics | |||
Lee (1913) | 27,000 | ---- | ---- | 27,000 | |||
Thompson (1929) | 39,000 | ---- | 10,000 | 39,000 | |||
Kunkel and Chase (1969) | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- |
Bloyd and Robson (1971) | 6,235 | 3,160 | 400 | ---- | 45 | 9,795 | |
Dutcher and Moyle (1973) | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- |
St. Amand (1986) | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- |
Austin (1988) | at least 30,000 | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- |
Bean (1989) | 6,300 | 2,000 | 1,000 | 400 | ---- | 400 | 9,700 |
Berenbrock and Martin (1991) | 6,236 | 3,170 | 400 | ---- | 43 | 9,806 | |
Watt (1993) | 8,876 | 975 | 0 | ---- | ---- | 9,851 | |
Thyne and others (1999) | 8,026 | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | 1,297 | 8,026 |
Bauer (2002) | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | 3,300 | ---- |
Brown and Caldwell (2009) | 5,890 | 300 | 1,600 | 50 | ---- | 1,000 | 7,840 |
Todd (2014) | 3,090 to 5,890 | 300 | 1,600 | 50 | ---- | 1,000 | 9,806 |
Reitz and others (2016) | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | 7,325 |
USGS (2017) statewide calibration (1981-2010) | 943 | 655 | 877 | 203 | ---- | 324 valley floor | 5,050 |
USGS (2018) local calibration (1981-2010) | 4,181 | 741 | 1,006 | 186 | 1,824 | 742 valley floor | 8,680 |
USGS (2018) local calibration (2000-2013) | 2,295 | 536 | 829 | 144 | 1,575 | 597 valley floor | 5,976 |
Future Climate Projections
Three future climate projections were selected from among 20 models used for California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment for application to Indian Wells Valley. The 3 models chosen are all from the business-as-usual emissions scenario and represent a range in future projected climate conditions from wet to dry. Annual time series of precipitation and average air temperature for the three future climate models are shown in figure 2, illustrating a rise in air temperature for all models of 4-5 degrees C by end of century, and a range of changes in precipitation from +47% to -22%, depending on the model. Climate and hydrologic data for these three future projections are available via web-based download for all sub-watersheds contributing to the principal aquifer in the Indian Wells Valley.
Below are other science projects associated with this project.
Basin Characterization Model (BCM)
Basin Characterization Model - Simulating Effects of Iowa Soil Management on Water Availability
Climate and Natural Resources Analysis and Planning for California's Northern Coast
Climate Ready Vulnerability Assessment
Coping with Drought in the Russian River Watershed
Below are software products associated with this project.
Basin Characterization Model (BCM)
The Basin Characterization Model (BCM) models the interactions of climate with empirically measured landscape attributes including topography, soils, and underlying geology. It is a grid-based model that calculates the water balance for each 18-acre cell (270m resolution) in a given watershed in set time steps for the entire area.
Below are partners associated with this project.
- Overview
Located in the northern Mojave Desert, the Indian Wells Valley has an arid environment, receiving only 4-6 inches of precipitation annually. Like most desert areas, Indian Wells Valley communities rely mostly on groundwater for their available groundwater supply. Increases in urban and agricultural development have resulted in increased groundwater pumpage for public and agricultural use, causing large water-level declines throughout the valley. Understanding the rate and amounts of natural groundwater recharge in the Indian Wells Valley is important to developing resource-management plans for the groundwater basin and the communities that depend on it.
Figure 1. Indian Wells Valley, CA study area. The Basin Characterization Model (BCM) was used to refine historical (1981 - 2010) rates of natural recharge into the Valley from 10 sub-watersheds. (Public Domain.) The Indian Wells Valley is located in the northern Mojave Desert and it has an arid environment, receiving only 4-6 inches of precipitation annually. Like most desert areas, Indian Wells Valley communities rely mostly on groundwater for their available groundwater supply. Increases in urban and agricultural development have resulted in increased groundwater pumpage for public and agricultural use, causing large water-level declines throughout the valley. The USGS California Basin Characterization Model (BCM) (Flint and others, 2013) was used in a revised form to understand the rate and amounts of natural groundwater recharge in the Indian Wells Valley and to refine historical estimates of groundwater recharge in the valley. Results from this study provide validation of recharge estimates from multiple sources representing parts of the water balance, including variables such as potential and actual evapotranspiration, and streamflow measurements, and are used to evaluate historical and future patterns of natural recharge in the valley.
Annual time series of precipitation and average air temperature for three future climate models for Indian Wells Valley, California as simulated by the Basin Characterization Model. (Public domain.) Development of a Monthly Dataset of Historical (1981-2010) and 3 Projected Futures (2011-2099) for Climate and Hydrology for Indian Wells Valley, CA
The Indian Wells Valley BCM was developed on a monthly time step at a spatial resolution of 270 square meters (m2) with a model domain that includes the 10 sub-watersheds that surround and drain into the Indian Wells Valley (fig. 1). The BCM used historical climate data from 1981-2010, and 3 future climate projections to develop hydrologic output for the study area such as recharge, runoff, and climatic water deficit. Model inputs include topography, soil properties, and geology datasets, which are static with time; monthly gridded precipitation and temperature datasets; and monthly gridded potential evapotranspiration (PET) (Flint and others, 2013).
The Indian Wells Valley BCM was calibrated to 10 watersheds (table 1) to provide recharge, runoff and climatic water deficit estimates for current and future climate conditions following methods in Flint and others (2013) and Flint and Flint (2012).
Table 1. Watersheds used for BCM calibration in Indian Wells Valley Site Name USGS Site Number Agency South Fork Kern River near Olancha, CA 11188200 USGS Cottonwood Creek near Cantil, CA 10264770 USGS Ninemile Creek near Brown, CA 10264878 USGS Little Lake Creek near Little Lake, CA 10264870 USGS Goler Culch near Randsburg, CA 10264710 USGS Darwin Wash near Darwin, CA 10250800 USGS Wildrose Creek near Wildrose Station, CA 10250600 USGS South Fork Kern River near Onyx, CA 11189500 USGS Sand Canyon Creek --- Kern County Water Agency Grapevine Canyon Creek --- Kern County Water Agency Table 2 shows previous estimates of recharge to the principal aquifer of the Indian Wells Valley. The table shows that local calibration results of the BCM model for the time period 1981-2010 correspond very well to previous recorded estimates, providing an independent approach that corroborates the general average annual estimate of approximately 8,700 acre-feet/year.
Table 2. Previous Estimates of Recharge to the Principal Aquifer in Indian Wells Valley Data Source Surface Drainage (acre-feet/year) Inflow from Rose Valley
(acre-feet/year)Total Natural Recharge
(acre-feet/year)Sierra Nevada Coso Range Argus Range El Paso Mountains Volcanics Lee (1913) 27,000 ---- ---- 27,000 Thompson (1929) 39,000 ---- 10,000 39,000 Kunkel and Chase (1969) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Bloyd and Robson (1971) 6,235 3,160 400 ---- 45 9,795 Dutcher and Moyle (1973) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- St. Amand (1986) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Austin (1988) at least 30,000 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Bean (1989) 6,300 2,000 1,000 400 ---- 400 9,700 Berenbrock and Martin (1991) 6,236 3,170 400 ---- 43 9,806 Watt (1993) 8,876 975 0 ---- ---- 9,851 Thyne and others (1999) 8,026 ---- ---- ---- ---- 1,297 8,026 Bauer (2002) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 3,300 ---- Brown and Caldwell (2009) 5,890 300 1,600 50 ---- 1,000 7,840 Todd (2014) 3,090 to 5,890 300 1,600 50 ---- 1,000 9,806 Reitz and others (2016) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 7,325 USGS (2017) statewide calibration (1981-2010) 943 655 877 203 ---- 324 valley floor 5,050 USGS (2018) local calibration (1981-2010) 4,181 741 1,006 186 1,824 742 valley floor 8,680 USGS (2018) local calibration (2000-2013) 2,295 536 829 144 1,575 597 valley floor 5,976 Future Climate Projections
Three future climate projections were selected from among 20 models used for California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment for application to Indian Wells Valley. The 3 models chosen are all from the business-as-usual emissions scenario and represent a range in future projected climate conditions from wet to dry. Annual time series of precipitation and average air temperature for the three future climate models are shown in figure 2, illustrating a rise in air temperature for all models of 4-5 degrees C by end of century, and a range of changes in precipitation from +47% to -22%, depending on the model. Climate and hydrologic data for these three future projections are available via web-based download for all sub-watersheds contributing to the principal aquifer in the Indian Wells Valley.
- Science
Below are other science projects associated with this project.
Basin Characterization Model (BCM)
The Basin Characterization Model (BCM) is a simple grid-based model that calculates the water balance for any time step or spatial scale by using climate inputs, precipitation, minimum and maximum air temperature. The BCM can translate fine-scale maps of climate trends and projections into the hydrologic consequences, to permit evaluation of the impacts to water availability at regional, watershed...Basin Characterization Model - Simulating Effects of Iowa Soil Management on Water Availability
As a result of climate change, heavy rainfall, as well as extended dry periods, are becoming more common in the Midwestern United States. These trends are only expected to continue. So, increasing the capacity of soil to store water has become more critical. Storing water increases availability in dry conditions. And the absorption of additional water in wet conditions reduces potential flooding...Climate and Natural Resources Analysis and Planning for California's Northern Coast
The North Coast Resource Partnership (NCRP) is an innovative, stakeholder-driven collaboration among local government, Tribes, watershed groups, and interested partners in the North Coast region of California. The North Coast comprises seven counties, Tribal lands, major watersheds, and a planning area of 19,390 square miles representing 12% of California's landscape. The NCRP integrates long-term...Climate Ready Vulnerability Assessment
To create a framework for adapting to climate change, decision makers need to understand specific threats to our water supply, land use suitability, hazard risks, ecosystems and quality of life. A vulnerability assessment that defines the projected degree to which an ecosystem, landscape, or watershed is vulnerable to change will help to create this framework. Presently those who are open to...Coping with Drought in the Russian River Watershed
Drought in the Russian River region is keyed to the absence of large winter storms-the RR is winter rain-driven, with a few atmospheric river (AR) storms each year bringing 40-50% of the annual rainfall. Two multi-purpose reservoirs provide storage for warm-season uses, and there is little to no snow pack to extend the runoff season. The same ARs that provide beneficial water supply can also cause... - Multimedia
- Software
Below are software products associated with this project.
Basin Characterization Model (BCM)
The Basin Characterization Model (BCM) models the interactions of climate with empirically measured landscape attributes including topography, soils, and underlying geology. It is a grid-based model that calculates the water balance for each 18-acre cell (270m resolution) in a given watershed in set time steps for the entire area.
- Partners
Below are partners associated with this project.