Demands for water are projected to increase in the Lower Arkansas River Basin as the population continues to grow. Strategies to meet those demands include continued operation of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project water, enlargement of Pueblo and Turquoise Reservoirs, and various conservation measures; the overall strategy is defined in the Preferred Storage Options Plan (PSOP: see the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District site, https://secwcd.org). Water-quality effects to the river are possible as these strategies are implemented.
In 2002, a basic water-quality monitoring program was established in the Lower Arkansas River Basin to collect additional data needed to support the PSOP. Because no known methods were available to determine what effects future changes in operations will have on water quality, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Southeastern Colorado Water Activity Enterprise, began a study in 2002 to develop methods that could identify if future water-quality conditions have changed significantly from background (preexisting) water-quality conditions.
Methods have been developed to identify changes in background water-quality conditions using dissolved-solids concentrations and dissolved-solids loads as indicators at selected sites in the Arkansas River and Fountain Creek near Pueblo, Colorado. Daily dissolved-solids concentrations were estimated from daily specific-conductance values. The information is documented in the published U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5024 and comparison plots presented in a web tool can be used for real-time decision-support. Estimated real-time dissolved-solids concentrations and loads in the study areas may be considered as surrogates for current water-quality conditions, and the information used to help determine whether future water-quality conditions differ from current water-quality conditions.
Quick Link: Web tool to generate comparison plots of water-quality conditions
Below are publications associated with this project.
Methods to Identify Changes in Background Water-Quality Conditions Using Dissolved-Solids Concentrations and Loads as Indicators, Arkansas River and Fountain Creek, in the Vicinity of Pueblo, Colorado
Occurrence and distribution of dissolved solids, selenium, and uranium in groundwater and surface water in the Arkansas River Basin from the headwaters to Coolidge, Kansas, 1970-2009
Simulated effects of water exchanges on streamflow and specific conductance in the Arkansas River upstream from Avondale, Colorado
Relations of streamflow and specific-conductance trends to reservoir operations in the lower Arkansas River, southeastern Colorado
Relations of specific conductance to streamflow and selected water-quality characteristics of the Arkansas River basin, Colorado
Identifying Changes in Background Water-Quality Conditions, Arkansas River and Fountain Creek, Colorado
Web based application to compare, on a real-time basis, estimated dissolved-solids concentration and load as a surrogate for water-quality conditions in the Arkansas River and Fountain Creek in Colorado and determine whether future water-quality conditions are significantly different from background conditions.
Below are partners associated with this project.
- Overview
Demands for water are projected to increase in the Lower Arkansas River Basin as the population continues to grow. Strategies to meet those demands include continued operation of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project water, enlargement of Pueblo and Turquoise Reservoirs, and various conservation measures; the overall strategy is defined in the Preferred Storage Options Plan (PSOP: see the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District site, https://secwcd.org). Water-quality effects to the river are possible as these strategies are implemented.
In 2002, a basic water-quality monitoring program was established in the Lower Arkansas River Basin to collect additional data needed to support the PSOP. Because no known methods were available to determine what effects future changes in operations will have on water quality, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Southeastern Colorado Water Activity Enterprise, began a study in 2002 to develop methods that could identify if future water-quality conditions have changed significantly from background (preexisting) water-quality conditions.
Methods have been developed to identify changes in background water-quality conditions using dissolved-solids concentrations and dissolved-solids loads as indicators at selected sites in the Arkansas River and Fountain Creek near Pueblo, Colorado. Daily dissolved-solids concentrations were estimated from daily specific-conductance values. The information is documented in the published U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5024 and comparison plots presented in a web tool can be used for real-time decision-support. Estimated real-time dissolved-solids concentrations and loads in the study areas may be considered as surrogates for current water-quality conditions, and the information used to help determine whether future water-quality conditions differ from current water-quality conditions.
Quick Link: Web tool to generate comparison plots of water-quality conditions
- Publications
Below are publications associated with this project.
Methods to Identify Changes in Background Water-Quality Conditions Using Dissolved-Solids Concentrations and Loads as Indicators, Arkansas River and Fountain Creek, in the Vicinity of Pueblo, Colorado
Effective management of existing water-storage capacity in the Arkansas River Basin is anticipated to help satisfy the need for water in southeastern Colorado. A strategy to meet these needs has been developed, but implementation could affect the water quality of the Arkansas River and Fountain Creek in the vicinity of Pueblo, Colorado. Because no known methods are available to determine what effeAuthorsRoderick F. OrtizOccurrence and distribution of dissolved solids, selenium, and uranium in groundwater and surface water in the Arkansas River Basin from the headwaters to Coolidge, Kansas, 1970-2009
In 2007, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with City of Aurora, Colorado Springs Utilities, Colorado Water Conservation Board, Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District, Pueblo Board of Water Works, Southeastern Colorado Water Activity Enterprise, Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District, and Upper Arkansas Water Conservancy District began a retrospective evaluationAuthorsLisa D. Miller, Kenneth R. Watts, Roderick F. OrtizSimulated effects of water exchanges on streamflow and specific conductance in the Arkansas River upstream from Avondale, Colorado
The potential effects of future water-exchange scenarios on streamflow and specific conductance in the Arkansas River were simulated with two accounting models. The major processes in the models simulated the historical exchange potential in the Arkansas River and the operation of a native and a nonnative Arkansas River water exchange. The potential effects of future exchange conditions were simulAuthorsMichael E. LewisRelations of streamflow and specific-conductance trends to reservoir operations in the lower Arkansas River, southeastern Colorado
No abstract available.AuthorsM.E. Lewis, D. L. BrendleRelations of specific conductance to streamflow and selected water-quality characteristics of the Arkansas River basin, Colorado
Areal, seasonal, and long-term variations in the specific conductance of surface and groundwater in the Arkansas River basin of Colorado were evaluated and relations of specific conductance to stream-flow and to concentrations of dissolved solids and major ions were determined as part of an effort to develop a comprehensive hydrologic model of the basin. Mean specific conductance of surface and grAuthorsDoug Cain - Web Tools
Identifying Changes in Background Water-Quality Conditions, Arkansas River and Fountain Creek, Colorado
Web based application to compare, on a real-time basis, estimated dissolved-solids concentration and load as a surrogate for water-quality conditions in the Arkansas River and Fountain Creek in Colorado and determine whether future water-quality conditions are significantly different from background conditions.
- Partners
Below are partners associated with this project.