Upper Klamath Lake and Clear Lake sampling for suckers from 2015 through 2022
February 2, 2024
Data in this data set include effort expended to collect suckers for cohort tracking and metrics and observations for each sucker captured from 2015 through 2022. There are two levels of data. All Nets data contains 5102 records and the data file is 609 KB. Captures data contains 3764 records and the data file is 504 KB. The data files can be linked by setID which is a unique identifier for a unique net set. Data files are CSV files that are comma delimited.
Citation Information
| Publication Year | 2024 |
|---|---|
| Title | Upper Klamath Lake and Clear Lake sampling for suckers from 2015 through 2022 |
| DOI | 10.5066/P93KYGEG |
| Authors | Barbara A Martin, Rachael K Paul-Wilson, Alta C Harris |
| Product Type | Data Release |
| Record Source | USGS Asset Identifier Service (AIS) |
| USGS Organization | Western Fisheries Research Center (WFRC) |
| Rights | This work is marked with CC0 1.0 Universal |
Related
Growth, survival, and cohort formation of juvenile Lost River (Deltistes luxatus) and shortnose suckers (Chasmistes brevirostris) in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, and Clear Lake Reservoir, California—2021–22 monitoring report
Executive SummaryThe work reported in this publication provides updated data and interpretation for sampling years 2015 and 2022 of the juvenile monitoring project. The study objectives, background, study area, species description, and methods remained the same or similar throughout the years, while the executive summary, results, and discussion were updated each year. Therefore much of this paper
Authors
Barbara A. Martin, John M. Caldwell, Jacob R. Krause, Alta C. Harris
Related
Growth, survival, and cohort formation of juvenile Lost River (Deltistes luxatus) and shortnose suckers (Chasmistes brevirostris) in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, and Clear Lake Reservoir, California—2021–22 monitoring report
Executive SummaryThe work reported in this publication provides updated data and interpretation for sampling years 2015 and 2022 of the juvenile monitoring project. The study objectives, background, study area, species description, and methods remained the same or similar throughout the years, while the executive summary, results, and discussion were updated each year. Therefore much of this paper
Authors
Barbara A. Martin, John M. Caldwell, Jacob R. Krause, Alta C. Harris