Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

A field test of the extent of bias in selection estimates after accounting for emigration

January 1, 2005

Question: To what extent does trait-dependent emigration bias selection estimates in a natural system? Organisms: Two freshwater cohorts of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) juveniles. Field site: A 1 km stretch of a small stream (West Brook) in western Massachusetts. USA from which emigration could be detected continuously. Methods: Estimated viability selection differentials for body size either including or ignoring emigration (include = emigrants survived interval, ignore = emigrants did not survive interval) for 12 intervals. Results: Seasonally variable size-related emigration from our study site generated variable levels of bias in selection estimates for body size. The magnitude of this bias was closely related with the extent of size-dependent emigration during each interval. Including or ignoring the effects of emigration changed the significance of selection estimates in 5 of the 12 intervals, and changed the estimated direction of selection in 4 of the 12 intervals. These results indicate the extent to which inferences about selection in a natural system can be biased by failing to account for trait-dependent emigration. ?? 2005 Benjamin H. Letcher.

Publication Year 2005
Title A field test of the extent of bias in selection estimates after accounting for emigration
Authors B. H. Letcher, G.E. Horton, T.L. Dubreuil, M. J. O'Donnell
Publication Type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Series Title Evolutionary Ecology Research
Index ID 70029567
Record Source USGS Publications Warehouse