Large carnivore science: non-experimental studies are useful, but experiments are better
June 16, 2017
We recently described the following six interrelated issues that justify
questioning some of the discourse about the reliability of the literature on the
ecological roles of large carnivores (Allen et al. In press):
1. The overall paucity of available data,
2. The reliability of carnivore population sampling techniques,
3. The general disregard for alternative hypotheses to top-down forcing,
4. The lack of applied science studies,
5. The frequent use of logical fallacies,
6. The generalisation of results from relatively pristine systems to those
substantially altered by humans.
Citation Information
| Publication Year | 2017 |
|---|---|
| Title | Large carnivore science: non-experimental studies are useful, but experiments are better |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.fooweb.2017.06.002 |
| Authors | Benjamin L. Allen, Lee R. Allen, Henrik Andrén, Guy Ballard, Luigi Boitani, Richard M. Engeman, Peter J. S. Fleming, Adam T. Ford, Peter M. Haswell, Rafał Kowalczyk, John D. C. Linnell, L. David Mech, Daniel M. Parker |
| Publication Type | Article |
| Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
| Series Title | Food Webs |
| Index ID | 70189224 |
| Record Source | USGS Publications Warehouse |
| USGS Organization | Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center |