We clarify relationships between conditional (CAR) and simultaneous (SAR) autoregressive models. We review the literature on this topic and find that it is mostly incomplete. Our main result is that a SAR model can be written as a unique CAR model, and while a CAR model can be written as a SAR model, it is not unique. In fact, we show how any multivariate Gaussian distribution on a finite set of points with a positive-definite covariance matrix can be written as either a CAR or a SAR model. We illustrate how to obtain any number of SAR covariance matrices from a single CAR covariance matrix by using Givens rotation matrices on a simulated example. We also discuss sparseness in the original CAR construction, and for the resulting SAR weights matrix. For a real example, we use crime data in 49 neighborhoods from Columbus, Ohio, and show that a geostatistical model optimizes the likelihood much better than typical first-order CAR models. We then use the implied weights from the geostatistical model to estimate CAR model parameters that provides the best overall optimization.
Citation Information
Publication Year | 2019 |
---|---|
Title | On the relationship between conditional (CAR) and simultaneous (SAR) autoregressive models |
DOI | 10.1016/j.spasta.2018.04.006 |
Authors | Jay M. Ver Hoef, Ephraim M. Hanksb, Mevin Hooten |
Publication Type | Article |
Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
Series Title | Spatial Statistics |
Index ID | 70204360 |
Record Source | USGS Publications Warehouse |
USGS Organization | Fort Collins Science Center |