Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Some approaches to accounting for incidental carcass discoveries in non-monitored years using the Evidence of Absence model

April 13, 2020

Executive Summary

We evaluate three approaches to accounting for incidental carcasses when estimating an upper bound on total mortality (𝑀) as π‘€βˆ— using the Evidence of Absence model (EoA; Dalthorp and others, 2017) to assess compliance with an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) (Dalthorp & Huso, 2015) under a monitoring protocol that includes formal, dedicated carcass surveys that achieve an overall detection probability of 𝑔𝑠=0.15 in the first year, followed by 4 years with no formal monitoring but with carcasses potentially discovered incidentally by operations and maintenance crews in their normal course of activity or otherwise discovered outside the formal searches. We refer to carcasses discovered incidentally as β€œincidentals” and define π‘₯𝑖 as the count of incidentals. Similarly, we define π‘₯𝑠 as the number of carcasses found during the formal searches conducted the first year.

Publication Year 2020
Title Some approaches to accounting for incidental carcass discoveries in non-monitored years using the Evidence of Absence model
DOI 10.3133/ofr20201027
Authors Daniel Dalthorp, Paul Rabie, Manuela Huso, Andrew Tredennick
Publication Type Report
Publication Subtype USGS Numbered Series
Series Title Open-File Report
Series Number 2020-1027
Index ID ofr20201027
Record Source USGS Publications Warehouse
USGS Organization Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center