Executive Summary
We evaluate three approaches to accounting for incidental carcasses when estimating an upper bound on total mortality (𝑀) as 𝑀∗ using the Evidence of Absence model (EoA; Dalthorp and others, 2017) to assess compliance with an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) (Dalthorp & Huso, 2015) under a monitoring protocol that includes formal, dedicated carcass surveys that achieve an overall detection probability of 𝑔𝑠=0.15 in the first year, followed by 4 years with no formal monitoring but with carcasses potentially discovered incidentally by operations and maintenance crews in their normal course of activity or otherwise discovered outside the formal searches. We refer to carcasses discovered incidentally as “incidentals” and define 𝑥𝑖 as the count of incidentals. Similarly, we define 𝑥𝑠 as the number of carcasses found during the formal searches conducted the first year.
Citation Information
Publication Year | 2020 |
---|---|
Title | Some approaches to accounting for incidental carcass discoveries in non-monitored years using the Evidence of Absence model |
DOI | 10.3133/ofr20201027 |
Authors | Daniel Dalthorp, Paul Rabie, Manuela Huso, Andrew Tredennick |
Publication Type | Report |
Publication Subtype | USGS Numbered Series |
Series Title | Open-File Report |
Series Number | 2020-1027 |
Index ID | ofr20201027 |
Record Source | USGS Publications Warehouse |
USGS Organization | Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center |