Trade-offs in designing a participatory acoustic study of bats: Comparison of user engagement and eata quality between two ultrasonic detectors

Technology for the acoustic detection of animals has advanced rapidly over the past few decades. Due to ease of use, consistency, and safety, acoustic methods are particularly useful for science applications that engage the public. In this study, we evaluated the technological and educational trade-offs between 2 acoustic bat detectors in a participatory science application along the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon, Arizona. Both devices were deployed simultaneously by commercial river guides in parallel with sampling insect prey for 1 h at dusk on 48 dates between April and October 2022. The detector with higher data quality capabilities recorded more bats overall (a mean of 231 more passes per hour) and more species (19 species, including 4 not detected by the lower quality detector). However, data from both detectors showed a decrease in total bat activity from spring to fall, despite the differences in recording capabilities. We conclude that detector quality matters, but user engagement is important when designing participatory research.