David L George
I develop mathematical models, numerical methods, and open-source software for simulating geophysical flows. My mathematical focus is PDEs and adaptive finite volume methods, with an application focus on earth-surface flows (e.g., landslides, debris flows, tsunamis, overland flooding).
Current Position:
Research Mathematician, USGS, Cascades Volcano Observatory, 2012-present
Previous Positions:
Mendenhall Postdoctoral Fellow, USGS, Cascades Volcano Observatory, 2008-2012
Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, 2007-2008
Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, 2006-2007.
Education:
Ph.D., Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle 2006.
M.S., Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle 2004.
B.S. , B.S. & B.A., Physics, Biology, Anthropology, University of California at Santa Barbara, 1997.
Science and Products
Debris flow runup on vertical barriers and adverse slopes Debris flow runup on vertical barriers and adverse slopes
Modelling landslide liquefaction, mobility bifurcation and the dynamics of the 2014 Oso disaster Modelling landslide liquefaction, mobility bifurcation and the dynamics of the 2014 Oso disaster
Discussion of “The relation between dilatancy, effective stress and dispersive pressure in granular avalanches” by P. Bartelt and O. Buser (DOI: 10.1007/s11440-016-0463-7) Discussion of “The relation between dilatancy, effective stress and dispersive pressure in granular avalanches” by P. Bartelt and O. Buser (DOI: 10.1007/s11440-016-0463-7)
Clawpack: Building an open source ecosystem for solving hyperbolic PDEs Clawpack: Building an open source ecosystem for solving hyperbolic PDEs
Landslide mobility and hazards: implications of the 2014 Oso disaster Landslide mobility and hazards: implications of the 2014 Oso disaster
A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. I. Physical basis A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. I. Physical basis
A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy: II. Numerical predictions and experimental tests. A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy: II. Numerical predictions and experimental tests.
A two-phase debris-flow model that includes coupled evolution of volume fractions, granular dilatancy, and pore-fluid pressure A two-phase debris-flow model that includes coupled evolution of volume fractions, granular dilatancy, and pore-fluid pressure
The GeoClaw software for depth-averaged flows with adaptive refinement The GeoClaw software for depth-averaged flows with adaptive refinement
Adaptive finite volume methods with well-balanced Riemann solvers for modeling floods in rugged terrain: Application to the Malpasset dam-break flood (France, 1959) Adaptive finite volume methods with well-balanced Riemann solvers for modeling floods in rugged terrain: Application to the Malpasset dam-break flood (France, 1959)
Tsunami modelling with adaptively refined finite volume methods Tsunami modelling with adaptively refined finite volume methods
Parallelization of GeoClaw code for modeling geophysical flows with adaptive mesh refinement on many-core systems Parallelization of GeoClaw code for modeling geophysical flows with adaptive mesh refinement on many-core systems
Non-USGS Publications**
**Disclaimer: The views expressed in Non-USGS publications are those of the author and do not represent the views of the USGS, Department of the Interior, or the U.S. Government.
Science and Products
Debris flow runup on vertical barriers and adverse slopes Debris flow runup on vertical barriers and adverse slopes
Modelling landslide liquefaction, mobility bifurcation and the dynamics of the 2014 Oso disaster Modelling landslide liquefaction, mobility bifurcation and the dynamics of the 2014 Oso disaster
Discussion of “The relation between dilatancy, effective stress and dispersive pressure in granular avalanches” by P. Bartelt and O. Buser (DOI: 10.1007/s11440-016-0463-7) Discussion of “The relation between dilatancy, effective stress and dispersive pressure in granular avalanches” by P. Bartelt and O. Buser (DOI: 10.1007/s11440-016-0463-7)
Clawpack: Building an open source ecosystem for solving hyperbolic PDEs Clawpack: Building an open source ecosystem for solving hyperbolic PDEs
Landslide mobility and hazards: implications of the 2014 Oso disaster Landslide mobility and hazards: implications of the 2014 Oso disaster
A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. I. Physical basis A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. I. Physical basis
A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy: II. Numerical predictions and experimental tests. A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy: II. Numerical predictions and experimental tests.
A two-phase debris-flow model that includes coupled evolution of volume fractions, granular dilatancy, and pore-fluid pressure A two-phase debris-flow model that includes coupled evolution of volume fractions, granular dilatancy, and pore-fluid pressure
The GeoClaw software for depth-averaged flows with adaptive refinement The GeoClaw software for depth-averaged flows with adaptive refinement
Adaptive finite volume methods with well-balanced Riemann solvers for modeling floods in rugged terrain: Application to the Malpasset dam-break flood (France, 1959) Adaptive finite volume methods with well-balanced Riemann solvers for modeling floods in rugged terrain: Application to the Malpasset dam-break flood (France, 1959)
Tsunami modelling with adaptively refined finite volume methods Tsunami modelling with adaptively refined finite volume methods
Parallelization of GeoClaw code for modeling geophysical flows with adaptive mesh refinement on many-core systems Parallelization of GeoClaw code for modeling geophysical flows with adaptive mesh refinement on many-core systems
Non-USGS Publications**
**Disclaimer: The views expressed in Non-USGS publications are those of the author and do not represent the views of the USGS, Department of the Interior, or the U.S. Government.