Morgan T Page
Morgan Page is a geophysicist in the Earthquake Science Center.
Science and Products
Filter Total Items: 43
The normal faulting 2020 Mw5.8 Lone Pine, Eastern California earthquake sequence The normal faulting 2020 Mw5.8 Lone Pine, Eastern California earthquake sequence
The 2020 Mw 5.8 Lone Pine earthquake, the largest earthquake on the Owens Valley fault zone, eastern California, since the nineteenth century, ruptured an extensional stepover in that fault. Owens Valley separates two normal‐faulting regimes, the western margin of the Great basin and the eastern margin of the Sierra Nevada, forming a complex seismotectonic zone, and a possible nascent...
Authors
Egill Hauksson, Brian J. Olsen, Alex R. Grant, Jennifer R Andrews, Angela I. Chung, Susan E. Hough, Hiroo Kanamori, Sara K. McBride, Andrew J. Michael, Morgan T. Page, Zachary E. Ross, Deborah Smith, Sotiris Valkaniotis
Revisiting California’s past great earthquakes and long-term earthquake rate Revisiting California’s past great earthquakes and long-term earthquake rate
In this study, we revisit the three largest historical earthquakes in California—the 1857 Fort Tejon, 1872 Owens Valley, and 1906 San Francisco earthquakes—to review their published moment magnitudes, and compare their estimated shaking distributions with predictions using modern ground‐motion models (GMMs) and ground‐motion intensity conversion equations. Currently accepted moment...
Authors
Susan E. Hough, Morgan T. Page, Leah Salditch, Molly M. Gallahue, Madeleine C. Lucas, James S. Neely, Seth Stein
Generalizing the inversion‐based PSHA source model for an interconnected fault system Generalizing the inversion‐based PSHA source model for an interconnected fault system
This article represents a step toward generalizing and simplifying the procedure for constructing an inversion‐based seismic hazard source model for an interconnected fault system, including the specification of adjustable segmentation constraints. A very simple example is used to maximize understandability and to counter the notion that an inversion approach is only applicable when an...
Authors
Edward H. Field, Kevin R. Milner, Morgan T. Page
More fault connectivity Is needed in seismic hazard analysis More fault connectivity Is needed in seismic hazard analysis
Did the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3) go overboard with multifault ruptures? Schwartz (2018) argues that there are too many long ruptures in the model. Here, I address his concern and show that the UCERF3 rupture‐length distribution matches empirical data. I also present evidence that, if anything, the UCERF3 model could be improved by adding more...
Authors
Morgan T. Page
New opportunities to study earthquake precursors New opportunities to study earthquake precursors
No abstract available.
Authors
M. E. Pritchard, R. M. Allen, T. W. Becker, M. D. Behn, E. E. Brodsky, R. Burgmann, C. Ebinger, J. T. Freymueller, M. C. Gerstenberger, B. Haines, Y. Kaneko, S. D. Jacobsen, N. Lindsey, Jeffrey J. McGuire, Morgan T. Page, S. Ruiz, M. Tolstoy, L. Wallace, W. R. Walter, W. Wilcock, H. Vincent
Operational earthquake forecasting during the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence with the UCERF3-ETAS model Operational earthquake forecasting during the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence with the UCERF3-ETAS model
The first Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 3–epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (UCERF3‐ETAS) aftershock simulations were running on a high‐performance computing cluster within 33 min of the 4 July 2019 M 6.4 Searles Valley earthquake. UCERF3‐ETAS, an extension of the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3), is the first comprehensive, fault...
Authors
Kevin R. Milner, Edward H. Field, William H Savran, Morgan T. Page, Thomas H Jordan
Science and Products
Filter Total Items: 43
The normal faulting 2020 Mw5.8 Lone Pine, Eastern California earthquake sequence The normal faulting 2020 Mw5.8 Lone Pine, Eastern California earthquake sequence
The 2020 Mw 5.8 Lone Pine earthquake, the largest earthquake on the Owens Valley fault zone, eastern California, since the nineteenth century, ruptured an extensional stepover in that fault. Owens Valley separates two normal‐faulting regimes, the western margin of the Great basin and the eastern margin of the Sierra Nevada, forming a complex seismotectonic zone, and a possible nascent...
Authors
Egill Hauksson, Brian J. Olsen, Alex R. Grant, Jennifer R Andrews, Angela I. Chung, Susan E. Hough, Hiroo Kanamori, Sara K. McBride, Andrew J. Michael, Morgan T. Page, Zachary E. Ross, Deborah Smith, Sotiris Valkaniotis
Revisiting California’s past great earthquakes and long-term earthquake rate Revisiting California’s past great earthquakes and long-term earthquake rate
In this study, we revisit the three largest historical earthquakes in California—the 1857 Fort Tejon, 1872 Owens Valley, and 1906 San Francisco earthquakes—to review their published moment magnitudes, and compare their estimated shaking distributions with predictions using modern ground‐motion models (GMMs) and ground‐motion intensity conversion equations. Currently accepted moment...
Authors
Susan E. Hough, Morgan T. Page, Leah Salditch, Molly M. Gallahue, Madeleine C. Lucas, James S. Neely, Seth Stein
Generalizing the inversion‐based PSHA source model for an interconnected fault system Generalizing the inversion‐based PSHA source model for an interconnected fault system
This article represents a step toward generalizing and simplifying the procedure for constructing an inversion‐based seismic hazard source model for an interconnected fault system, including the specification of adjustable segmentation constraints. A very simple example is used to maximize understandability and to counter the notion that an inversion approach is only applicable when an...
Authors
Edward H. Field, Kevin R. Milner, Morgan T. Page
More fault connectivity Is needed in seismic hazard analysis More fault connectivity Is needed in seismic hazard analysis
Did the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3) go overboard with multifault ruptures? Schwartz (2018) argues that there are too many long ruptures in the model. Here, I address his concern and show that the UCERF3 rupture‐length distribution matches empirical data. I also present evidence that, if anything, the UCERF3 model could be improved by adding more...
Authors
Morgan T. Page
New opportunities to study earthquake precursors New opportunities to study earthquake precursors
No abstract available.
Authors
M. E. Pritchard, R. M. Allen, T. W. Becker, M. D. Behn, E. E. Brodsky, R. Burgmann, C. Ebinger, J. T. Freymueller, M. C. Gerstenberger, B. Haines, Y. Kaneko, S. D. Jacobsen, N. Lindsey, Jeffrey J. McGuire, Morgan T. Page, S. Ruiz, M. Tolstoy, L. Wallace, W. R. Walter, W. Wilcock, H. Vincent
Operational earthquake forecasting during the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence with the UCERF3-ETAS model Operational earthquake forecasting during the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence with the UCERF3-ETAS model
The first Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 3–epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (UCERF3‐ETAS) aftershock simulations were running on a high‐performance computing cluster within 33 min of the 4 July 2019 M 6.4 Searles Valley earthquake. UCERF3‐ETAS, an extension of the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3), is the first comprehensive, fault...
Authors
Kevin R. Milner, Edward H. Field, William H Savran, Morgan T. Page, Thomas H Jordan