Invasive mammalian predators are the most damaging group of animals affecting global biodiversity. When introduced on remote islands, alien rodent species can devastate local biota and have been linked to approximately 30% of all extinctions. In addition, rodents can also consume and spoil crops, and serve as disease vectors that affect humans. Starting in the 20th century, rodenticides were developed and introduced for the control of these commensal species. Regrettably, some rodenticides pose a significant hazard to target wildlife.
The Challenge: While anticoagulant rodenticides revolutionized the rodent pest control industry, they are hazardous to non-target predatory and scavenging birds on a global scale. Second-generation compounds, like brodifacoum, can have prolonged effects in non-target species that increase toxicity of subsequent exposures. Restrictions on the sale, distribution and packaging of some second- generation anticoagulant rodenticides (e.g., brodifacoum, difethialone, bromadiolone and difenacoum) have been instituted by the US EPA, but do not seem to have successfully reduced exposure and effects in non-target predatory wildlife. The risk posed by anticoagulant rodenticides to wildlife is inadequately characterized. Data are needed to better evaluate the threat of these compounds to non-target organisms, and new safer compounds are needed to mitigate risk.
The Science: Data on the toxicity of chlorophacinone, diphacinone and brodifacoum have been collected in American kestrels and Eastern screech-owls (e.g., blood clotting time, hematocrit, histopathological lesions, overt signs of distress). Findings are being employed in both deterministic and probabilistic risk assessments, and in the generation of dietary- and tissue residue-based toxicity reference values. A pharmacokinetic model for diphacinone in various species of wild birds is under development in predatory birds and will assist in further evaluating the hazard of this rodenticide. Studies evaluating the potential hazard of rapidly metabolized anticoagulant rodenticide diastereoisomers in target species are being planned.
The Future: Results of recent studies with brodifacoum now indicate the potential for latent and protracted effects of combinations of anticoagulant rodenticides encountered by free-ranging raptors residing at the urban-agricultural interface. Efforts are underway to study new “eco-friendly” rodenticides that could potentially mitigate risk to non-target organisms.
Below are publications associated with this project.
Brodifacoum toxicity in American Kestrels (Falco sparverius) with evidence of increased hazard upon subsequent anticoagulant rodenticide exposure
Use of blood clotting assays to assess potential anticoagulant rodenticide exposure and effects in free-ranging birds of prey
Anticoagulant rodenticides and wildlife: Introduction
Anticoagulant rodenticide toxicity to non-target wildlife under controlled exposure conditions
Anticoagulant rodenticides and wildlife: Concluding remarks
Paying the pipers: Mitigating the impact of anticoagulant rodenticides on predators and scavengers
Toxicity reference values for chlorophacinone and their application for assessing anticoagulant rodenticide risk to raptors
Adverse outcome pathway and risks of anticoagulant rodenticides to predatory wildlife
Development of dietary-based toxic reference values to assess the risk of chlorophacinone to non-target raptorial birds
Toxicokinetics and coagulopathy threshold of the rodenticide diphacinone in eastern screech-owls (Megascops asio)
Critique on the use of the standardized avian acute oral toxicity test for first generation anticoagulant rodenticides
Assessment of toxicity and potential risk of the anticoagulant rodenticide diphacinone using Eastern screech-owls (Megascops asio)
Below are partners associated with this project.
- Overview
Invasive mammalian predators are the most damaging group of animals affecting global biodiversity. When introduced on remote islands, alien rodent species can devastate local biota and have been linked to approximately 30% of all extinctions. In addition, rodents can also consume and spoil crops, and serve as disease vectors that affect humans. Starting in the 20th century, rodenticides were developed and introduced for the control of these commensal species. Regrettably, some rodenticides pose a significant hazard to target wildlife.
The Challenge: While anticoagulant rodenticides revolutionized the rodent pest control industry, they are hazardous to non-target predatory and scavenging birds on a global scale. Second-generation compounds, like brodifacoum, can have prolonged effects in non-target species that increase toxicity of subsequent exposures. Restrictions on the sale, distribution and packaging of some second- generation anticoagulant rodenticides (e.g., brodifacoum, difethialone, bromadiolone and difenacoum) have been instituted by the US EPA, but do not seem to have successfully reduced exposure and effects in non-target predatory wildlife. The risk posed by anticoagulant rodenticides to wildlife is inadequately characterized. Data are needed to better evaluate the threat of these compounds to non-target organisms, and new safer compounds are needed to mitigate risk.
The Science: Data on the toxicity of chlorophacinone, diphacinone and brodifacoum have been collected in American kestrels and Eastern screech-owls (e.g., blood clotting time, hematocrit, histopathological lesions, overt signs of distress). Findings are being employed in both deterministic and probabilistic risk assessments, and in the generation of dietary- and tissue residue-based toxicity reference values. A pharmacokinetic model for diphacinone in various species of wild birds is under development in predatory birds and will assist in further evaluating the hazard of this rodenticide. Studies evaluating the potential hazard of rapidly metabolized anticoagulant rodenticide diastereoisomers in target species are being planned.
The Future: Results of recent studies with brodifacoum now indicate the potential for latent and protracted effects of combinations of anticoagulant rodenticides encountered by free-ranging raptors residing at the urban-agricultural interface. Efforts are underway to study new “eco-friendly” rodenticides that could potentially mitigate risk to non-target organisms.
- Publications
Below are publications associated with this project.
Filter Total Items: 16Brodifacoum toxicity in American Kestrels (Falco sparverius) with evidence of increased hazard upon subsequent anticoagulant rodenticide exposure
A seminal question in ecotoxicology is the extent to which contaminant exposure evokes prolonged effects on physiological function and fitness. A series of studies were undertaken with American kestrels ingesting environmentally realistic concentrations of the second-generation anticoagulant rodenticide (SGAR) brodifacoum (BROD). Kestrels fed BROD at 0.3, 1.0 or 3.0 µg/g diet wet wt for 7 d exhibiAuthorsBarnett A. Rattner, Steven F Volker, Julia S. Lankton, Thomas G. Bean, Rebecca S. Lazarus, Katherine E. HorakUse of blood clotting assays to assess potential anticoagulant rodenticide exposure and effects in free-ranging birds of prey
Non-target wildlife, particularly birds of prey, are widely exposed to and acutely poisoned by anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs). An unresolved issue surrounding such exposure, however, is the potential for sublethal effects. In particular, the consequences of AR exposure and resulting coagulopathy on health and survival of unintentionally exposed animals, which often encounter a multitude of anthrAuthorsSofi Hindmarch, Barnett A. Rattner, John E. ElliottAnticoagulant rodenticides and wildlife: Introduction
Rodents have interacted with people since the beginning of systematic food storage by humans in the early Neolithic era. Such interactions have had adverse outcomes such as threats to human health, spoiling and consumption of food sources, damage to human infrastructure and detrimental effects on indigenous island wildlife (through inadvertent anthropogenic assisted introductions). These socio/ecoAuthorsNico W. van den Brink, John E. Elliott, Richard F. Shore, Barnett A. RattnerAnticoagulant rodenticide toxicity to non-target wildlife under controlled exposure conditions
Much of our understanding of anticoagulant rodenticide toxicity to non-target wildlife has been derived from molecular through whole animal research and registration studies in domesticated birds and mammals, and to a lesser degree from trials with captive wildlife. Using these data, an adverse outcome pathway identifying molecular initiating and anchoring events (inhibition of vitamin K epoxide rAuthorsBarnett A. Rattner, F. Nicholas MastrotaAnticoagulant rodenticides and wildlife: Concluding remarks
Rodents are known to affect human society globally in various adverse ways, resulting in a widespread demand for their continuous control. Anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) have been, and currently remain, the cornerstone of rodent control throughout the world. Although alternative control methods exist, they are generally less effective. ARs work by affecting vitamin K metabolism, thereby preventiAuthorsNico W. van den Brink, John E. Elliott, Richard F. Shore, Barnett A. RattnerPaying the pipers: Mitigating the impact of anticoagulant rodenticides on predators and scavengers
Anticoagulant rodenticides, mainly second-generation forms, or SGARs, dominate the global market for rodent control. Introduced in the 1970s to counter genetic resistance in rodent populations to first-generation compounds such as warfarin, SGARs are extremely toxic and highly effective killers. However, their tendency to persist and accumulate in the body has led to the widespread contamination oAuthorsJohn E. Elliott, Barnett A. Rattner, Richard F. Shore, Nico W. van den BrinkToxicity reference values for chlorophacinone and their application for assessing anticoagulant rodenticide risk to raptors
Despite widespread use and benefit, there are growing concerns regarding hazards of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides to non-target wildlife which may result in expanded use of first-generation compounds, including chlorophacinone (CPN). The toxicity of CPN over a 7-day exposure period was investigated in American kestrels (Falco sparverius) fed either rat tissue mechanically-amended wiAuthorsBarnett A. Rattner, Katherine E. Horak, Rebecca S. Lazarus, Sandra L. Schultz, Susan Knowles, Benjamin G. Abbo, Steven F. VolkerAdverse outcome pathway and risks of anticoagulant rodenticides to predatory wildlife
Despite a long history of successful use, routine application of some anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) may be at a crossroad due to new regulatory guidelines intended to mitigate risk. An adverse outcome pathway for ARs was developed to identify information gaps and end points to assess the effectiveness of regulations. This framework describes chemical properties of ARs, established macromoleculaAuthorsBarnett A. Rattner, Rebecca S. Lazarus, John E. Elliott, Richard F. Shore, Nico van den BrinkDevelopment of dietary-based toxic reference values to assess the risk of chlorophacinone to non-target raptorial birds
Regulatory changes in the use of some second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides in parts of North America may result in expanded use of first-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (FGARs). Recent toxicological studies with captive raptors have demonstrated that these species are considerably more sensitive to the FGAR diphacinone than traditional avian wildlife test species (mallard, bobwhite).AuthorsBarnett A. Rattner, Rebecca S. Lazarus, S. L. Shultz, Katherine E. Horak, Benjamin G. Abbo, Steven F. VolkerToxicokinetics and coagulopathy threshold of the rodenticide diphacinone in eastern screech-owls (Megascops asio)
In the United States, new regulations on second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides will likely be offset by expanded use of first-generation anticoagulant rodenticides. In the present study, eastern screech-owls (Megascops asio) were fed 10 µg diphacinone/g wet weight food for 7 d, and recovery was monitored over a 21-d postexposure period. By day 3 of exposure, diphacinone (DPN) was detected iAuthorsBarnett A. Rattner, K.E. Horak, Rebecca S. Lazarus, D.A. Goldade, J. J. JohnstonCritique on the use of the standardized avian acute oral toxicity test for first generation anticoagulant rodenticides
Avian risk assessments for rodenticides are often driven by the results of standardized acute oral toxicity tests without regards to a toxicant's mode of action and time course of adverse effects. First generation anticoagulant rodenticides (FGARs) generally require multiple feedings over several days to achieve a threshold concentration in tissue and cause adverse effects. This exposure regimen iAuthorsNimish B. Vyas, Barnett A. RattnerAssessment of toxicity and potential risk of the anticoagulant rodenticide diphacinone using Eastern screech-owls (Megascops asio)
In the United States, new regulatory restrictions have been placed on the use of some second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides. This action may be offset by expanded use of first-generation compounds (e.g., diphacinone; DPN). Single-day acute oral exposure of adult Eastern screech-owls (Megascops asio) to DPN evoked overt signs of intoxication, coagulopathy, histopathological lesions (e.g., heAuthorsBarnett A. Rattner, Katherine E. Horak, Rebecca S. Lazarus, Karen M. Eisenreich, Carol U. Meteyer, Steven F. Volker, Christopher M. Campton, John D. Eisemann, John J. Johnston - Partners
Below are partners associated with this project.