A Decision Support System (DSS) can be defined in many ways. The working definition the Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center (UMESC) uses is, "A spatially based computer application or data that assists a researcher or manager in making decisions." This is quite a broad definition and it needs to be, as the possibilities for types of DSS are limited only by the user group and the developer's imagination.
There is no one DSS; they are as diverse as the problems they help solve. This diversity requires that DSSs are built in a variety of ways using the most appropriate methods and tools for the individual application. The skills of potential DSS users vary widely as well, further necessitating multiple approaches to DSS development. Some small, highly trained user groups may want a powerful modeling tool with extensive functionality at the expense of ease of use. Other user groups less familiar with geographic information system (GIS) and spatial data may want an extremely easy to use application for a wide public or otherwise nontechnical audience. The UMESC DSS developers offer our partners a wide variety of technical skills and development options, ranging from the most simple Web page or small application to complex modeling application development.
Types of DSS Tools
The GIS tools fall into one of two categories: general purpose or specific purpose. General-purpose GIS tools are programs such as Esri's ArcGIS that have extensive functionality and can be difficult for users unfamiliar with GIS and cartographic principles to learn. Specific-purpose GIS tools are programs that are written by a GIS programmer to provide a user group with specific functions in an easy-to-use package. In the past, specific-purpose GIS tools were written primarily using a macro language such as Avenue (ArcView's macro language) or AML (ARC/INFO's macro language). This method of delivering specific-purpose GIS tools requires that each user have a copy of the host program (ARC/INFO or ArcView) to run the macro language application.
The GIS programmers now have a far richer set of tools for application development. Programming libraries with classes for interactive mapping and spatial analysis functions have made it possible to develop specific-purpose GIS tools using industry-standard programming languages that can be compiled and run without a host program (stand-alone). Internet development tools have matured as well, making it possible to develop fairly complex GIS-based programs that users can use through the World Wide Web. The UMESC programmers make extensive use of these development tools and actively search out new and emerging tools and techniques to get the right product in the hands of the decision makers at the right time.
Below are other science projects associated with this project.
Monarch Conservation Science Partnership Map Viewer and Tools
LINK: ArcGIS Tools for Conservation Planning
Below are publications associated with this project.
Decision support system development at the Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center
Restoring monarch butterfly habitat in the Midwestern US: 'All hands on deck'
Modelling moose–forest interactions under different predation scenarios at Isle Royale National Park, USA
Changes in aquatic vegetation and floodplain land cover in the Upper Mississippi and Illinois rivers (1989–2000–2010)
A generalizable energetics-based model of avian migration to facilitate continental-scale waterbird conservation
Relating mesocarnivore relative abundance to anthropogenic land-use with a hierarchical spatial count model
The Upper Mississippi River floodscape: spatial patterns of flood inundation and associated plant community distributions
Exploring relationships among land ownership, agricultural land use, and native fish species richness in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
A case study of assigning conservation value to dispersed habitat units for conservation planning
Historic distribution of Common Loons in Wisconsin in relation to changes in lake characteristics and surrounding land use
Anticipated effects of development on habitat fragmentation and movement of mammals into and out of the Schoodic District, Acadia National Park, Maine
Spatial scaling of core and dominant forest cover in the Upper Mississippi and Illinois River floodplains, USA
Spatial patterns of aquatic habitat richness in the Upper Mississippi River floodplain, USA
Below are software products associated with this project.
Composite Raster and Divergence Tool
The Composite Raster and Divergence Tool is an ArcGIS ArcMap add-in
Random Landscape Tool 10.5
Random Landscape Tool uses a raster data source and a table of classifications to create a random landscape. The classification table allows the user to weight the probability of occurrence to certain classes and to spatially restrict the distribution of classes to certain areas (zones).
Below are partners associated with this project.
- Overview
A Decision Support System (DSS) can be defined in many ways. The working definition the Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center (UMESC) uses is, "A spatially based computer application or data that assists a researcher or manager in making decisions." This is quite a broad definition and it needs to be, as the possibilities for types of DSS are limited only by the user group and the developer's imagination.
There is no one DSS; they are as diverse as the problems they help solve. This diversity requires that DSSs are built in a variety of ways using the most appropriate methods and tools for the individual application. The skills of potential DSS users vary widely as well, further necessitating multiple approaches to DSS development. Some small, highly trained user groups may want a powerful modeling tool with extensive functionality at the expense of ease of use. Other user groups less familiar with geographic information system (GIS) and spatial data may want an extremely easy to use application for a wide public or otherwise nontechnical audience. The UMESC DSS developers offer our partners a wide variety of technical skills and development options, ranging from the most simple Web page or small application to complex modeling application development.
Types of DSS Tools
The GIS tools fall into one of two categories: general purpose or specific purpose. General-purpose GIS tools are programs such as Esri's ArcGIS that have extensive functionality and can be difficult for users unfamiliar with GIS and cartographic principles to learn. Specific-purpose GIS tools are programs that are written by a GIS programmer to provide a user group with specific functions in an easy-to-use package. In the past, specific-purpose GIS tools were written primarily using a macro language such as Avenue (ArcView's macro language) or AML (ARC/INFO's macro language). This method of delivering specific-purpose GIS tools requires that each user have a copy of the host program (ARC/INFO or ArcView) to run the macro language application.
The GIS programmers now have a far richer set of tools for application development. Programming libraries with classes for interactive mapping and spatial analysis functions have made it possible to develop specific-purpose GIS tools using industry-standard programming languages that can be compiled and run without a host program (stand-alone). Internet development tools have matured as well, making it possible to develop fairly complex GIS-based programs that users can use through the World Wide Web. The UMESC programmers make extensive use of these development tools and actively search out new and emerging tools and techniques to get the right product in the hands of the decision makers at the right time.
- Science
Below are other science projects associated with this project.
Monarch Conservation Science Partnership Map Viewer and Tools
This web mapping application is a repository for data and tools that support the Monarch Conservation Science Partnership.LINK: ArcGIS Tools for Conservation Planning
Allows managers and planners to rapidly assess landscape attributes and link these attributes with species/habitat informationProvides resource managers a means to compare the conservation potential of local management units with that of the surrounding county, state, or regionCan be applied to any taxa or suite of taxa and any landscape, given that spatial data layers representing habitats are... - Publications
Below are publications associated with this project.
Decision support system development at the Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center
A Decision Support System (DSS) can be defined in many ways. The working definition used by the U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center (UMESC) is, “A spatially based computer application or data that assists a researcher or manager in making decisions.” This is quite a broad definition—and it needs to be, because the possibilities for types of DSSs are limited only by tAuthorsTimothy J. Fox, J. C. Nelson, Jason J. RohwederFilter Total Items: 17Restoring monarch butterfly habitat in the Midwestern US: 'All hands on deck'
The eastern migratory population of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus plexippus) has declined by >80% within the last two decades. One possible cause of this decline is the loss of ≥1.3 billion stems of milkweed (Asclepias spp.), which monarchs require for reproduction. In an effort to restore monarchs to a population goal established by the US Fish and Wildlife Service and adopted by Mexico,AuthorsWayne E. Thogmartin, Laura Lopez-Hoffman, Jason J. Rohweder, James E. Diffendorfer, Ryan G. Drum, Darius J. Semmens, Scott Black, Iris Caldwell, Donita Cotter, Pauline Drobney, Laura L. Jackson, Michael Gale, Doug Helmers, Steven B. Hilburger, Elizabeth Howard, Karen S. Oberhauser, John M. Pleasants, Brice X. Semmens, Orley R. Taylor, Patrick Ward, Jake F. Weltzin, Ruscena WiederholtModelling moose–forest interactions under different predation scenarios at Isle Royale National Park, USA
Loss of top predators may contribute to high ungulate population densities and chronic over-browsing of forest ecosystems. However, spatial and temporal variability in the strength of interactions between predators and ungulates occurs over scales that are much shorter than the scales over which forest communities change, making it difficult to characterize trophic cascades in forest ecosystems. WAuthorsNathan R. De Jager, Jason J. Rohweder, Brian R. Miranda, Brian R. Sturtevant, Timothy J. Fox, Mark C. RomanskiChanges in aquatic vegetation and floodplain land cover in the Upper Mississippi and Illinois rivers (1989–2000–2010)
Quantifying changes in the cover of river-floodplain systems can provide important insights into the processes that structure these landscapes as well as the potential consequences to the ecosystem services they provide. We examined net changes in 13 different aquatic and floodplain land cover classes using photo interpreted maps of the navigable portions of the Upper Mississippi River (UMR, aboveAuthorsNathan R. De Jager, Jason J. RohwederA generalizable energetics-based model of avian migration to facilitate continental-scale waterbird conservation
Conserving migratory birds is made especially difficult because of movement among spatially disparate locations across the annual cycle. In light of challenges presented by the scale and ecology of migratory birds, successful conservation requires integrating objectives, management, and monitoring across scales, from local management units to ecoregional and flyway administrative boundaries. We prAuthorsEric V. Lonsdorf, Wayne E. Thogmartin, Sarah Jacobi, Jorge Coppen, Amélie Y. Davis, Timothy J. Fox, Patricia J. Heglund, Rex Johnson, Tim Jones, Kevin P. Kenow, James E. Lyons, Kirsten E. Luke, Shannon Still, Brian G. TaverniaRelating mesocarnivore relative abundance to anthropogenic land-use with a hierarchical spatial count model
There is growing need to develop models of spatial patterns in animal abundance, yet comparatively few examples of such models exist. This is especially true in situations where the abundance of one species may inhibit that of another, such as the intensively-farmed landscape of the Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of the central United States, where waterfowl production is largely constrained by mesoAuthorsShawn M. Crimmins, Liza R. Walleser, Dan R. Hertel, Patrick C. McKann, Jason J. Rohweder, Wayne E. ThogmartinThe Upper Mississippi River floodscape: spatial patterns of flood inundation and associated plant community distributions
Questions How is the distribution of different plant communities associated with patterns of flood inundation across a large floodplain landscape? Location Thirty-eight thousand nine hundred and seventy hectare of floodplain, spanning 320 km of the Upper Mississippi River (UMR). Methods High-resolution elevation data (Lidar) and 30 yr of daily river stage data were integrated to produce a ‘floodscAuthorsNathan R. De Jager, Jason J. Rohweder, Yao Yin, Erin E. HoyExploring relationships among land ownership, agricultural land use, and native fish species richness in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
The general effects of agriculture on in-stream fish communities in the Upper Midwestern United States have been well studied for nearly three decades (Karr et al. 1985; Nerbonne and Vondracek 1991; Zimmerman et al. 2001; Goldstein and Meador 2005). Specific impacts include: lowered water levels, sediment loading and nutrient enrichment, loss of riparian habitat, changes to channel morphometry andAuthorsNathan R. De Jager, Jason J. RohwederA case study of assigning conservation value to dispersed habitat units for conservation planning
Resource managers are increasingly tasked with developing habitat conservation plans in the face of numerous, sometimes competing, objectives. These plans must often be implemented across dispersed habitat conservation units that may contribute unequally to overall conservation objectives. Using U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service waterfowl production areas (WPA) in western Minnesota as our conservatioAuthorsJason J. Rohweder, Sara C. Vacek, Shawn M. Crimmins, Wayne E. ThogmartinHistoric distribution of Common Loons in Wisconsin in relation to changes in lake characteristics and surrounding land use
A study was conducted to evaluate changes in water quality and land-use change associated with lakes that are south of the current breeding range of Common Loons in Wisconsin but that historically supported breeding loons. Museum collection records and published accounts were examined to identify lakes in southern Wisconsin with a former history of loon nesting activity. Historical and recentAuthorsKevin P. Kenow, Paul J. Garrison, Timothy J. Fox, Michael W. MeyerAnticipated effects of development on habitat fragmentation and movement of mammals into and out of the Schoodic District, Acadia National Park, Maine
Most national parks interact with adjacent lands because their boundaries fail to encompass all regional habitats, species pools, and migration routes. Activities planned for adjacent lands can have adverse effects on park resources and visitor experiences. For example, fragmentation of adjacent habitat into smaller and more isolated remnants may influence the suitability of park habitat for a widAuthorsJason J. Rohweder, Nathan R. De Jager, Glenn R. GuntenspergenSpatial scaling of core and dominant forest cover in the Upper Mississippi and Illinois River floodplains, USA
Different organisms respond to spatial structure in different terms and across different spatial scales. As a consequence, efforts to reverse habitat loss and fragmentation through strategic habitat restoration ought to account for the different habitat density and scale requirements of various taxonomic groups. Here, we estimated the local density of floodplain forest surrounding each of ~20 millAuthorsNathan R. De Jager, Jason J. RohwederSpatial patterns of aquatic habitat richness in the Upper Mississippi River floodplain, USA
Interactions among hydrology and geomorphology create shifting mosaics of aquatic habitat patches in large river floodplains (e.g., main and side channels, floodplain lakes, and shallow backwater areas) and the connectivity among these habitat patches underpins high levels of biotic diversity and productivity. However, the diversity and connectivity among the habitats of most floodplain rivers havAuthorsNathan R. De Jager, Jason J. Rohweder - Software
Below are software products associated with this project.
Composite Raster and Divergence Tool
The Composite Raster and Divergence Tool is an ArcGIS ArcMap add-in
Random Landscape Tool 10.5
Random Landscape Tool uses a raster data source and a table of classifications to create a random landscape. The classification table allows the user to weight the probability of occurrence to certain classes and to spatially restrict the distribution of classes to certain areas (zones).
- Partners
Below are partners associated with this project.