A nuclear explosion can cause an earthquake and even an aftershock sequence. However, earthquakes induced by explosions have been much smaller than the explosion, and the aftershock sequence produces fewer and smaller aftershocks than a similar size earthquake. Not all explosions have caused earthquakes. The range of a possible earthquake triggered by an explosion is limited to a few tens of kilometers from the shot point.
The possibility of large Nevada Test Site nuclear explosions triggering damaging earthquakes in California was publicly raised in 1969. As a test of this possibility, the rate of earthquake occurrence in northern California (magnitude 3.5 and larger) and the known times of the six largest thermonuclear tests (1965-1969) were plotted and it was obvious that no peaks in the seismicity occur at the times of the explosions. The largest underground thermonuclear tests conducted by the U.S. were detonated at the western end of the Aleutian Islands in Amchitka. The largest of these was a five megaton test (codename Cannikin) that occurred on November 6, 1971 with an energy release equivalent to a magnitude 6.9 earthquake. It did not trigger any earthquakes in the seismically active Aleutian Islands.
Learn more: Can a nuclear blast trigger a Yellowstone eruption? No. But how about an earthquake? Also no.
Related Content
How can you tell the difference between an explosion and an earthquake on a seismogram?
Explosions and earthquakes both release a large amount of energy very quickly, and both can be recorded by seismic instruments. However, because the forces involved in each are very different, the waveforms that each creates look different. Nuclear tests are very near the surface of the earth; all of the energy is released from a small volume surrounding the device. Earthquakes are typically...
Can we use explosives to cause small earthquakes in order to prevent having large ones?
No. Even huge amounts of explosive almost never cause even small earthquakes, and it would take hundreds and thousands of small earthquakes to equal a large one, even if it could be done. In addition, we wouldn't have any control over the size of the earthquake being created if it worked, since small and large earthquakes all start out in exactly the same way. It's just not physically possible.
What is the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), and what is the role of seismology in monitoring it?
On September 10, 1996, the United Nations General Assembly voted 158-3 to approve a treaty prohibiting all nuclear tests. The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty has been signed by 130 nations - including the United States. President Clinton signed the agreement on September 24, 1996. Seismology is one of several fields which plays a role in monitoring the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Underground...
New signatures of underground nuclear tests revealed by satellite radar interferometry
The containment of Soviet underground nuclear explosions
Taking the Earth's pulse
Seismic monitoring of the RULISON underground nuclear explosion near Rifle, Colorado, on September 1969
Use of seismic intensity data to predict the effects of earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions in various geologic settings
Seismic activity and faulting associated with a large underground nuclear explosion
Traveltimes and amplitudes from nuclear explosions; Nevada Test Site to Ordway, Colorado
Nuclear explosions: Some geologic effects of the gnome shot
Related Content
- FAQ
How can you tell the difference between an explosion and an earthquake on a seismogram?
Explosions and earthquakes both release a large amount of energy very quickly, and both can be recorded by seismic instruments. However, because the forces involved in each are very different, the waveforms that each creates look different. Nuclear tests are very near the surface of the earth; all of the energy is released from a small volume surrounding the device. Earthquakes are typically...
Can we use explosives to cause small earthquakes in order to prevent having large ones?
No. Even huge amounts of explosive almost never cause even small earthquakes, and it would take hundreds and thousands of small earthquakes to equal a large one, even if it could be done. In addition, we wouldn't have any control over the size of the earthquake being created if it worked, since small and large earthquakes all start out in exactly the same way. It's just not physically possible.
What is the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), and what is the role of seismology in monitoring it?
On September 10, 1996, the United Nations General Assembly voted 158-3 to approve a treaty prohibiting all nuclear tests. The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty has been signed by 130 nations - including the United States. President Clinton signed the agreement on September 24, 1996. Seismology is one of several fields which plays a role in monitoring the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Underground...
- Multimedia
- Publications
New signatures of underground nuclear tests revealed by satellite radar interferometry
New observations of surface displacement caused by past underground nuclear tests at the Nevada Test Site (NTS) are presented using interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR). The InSAR data reveal both coseismic and postseismic subsidence signals that extend one kilometer or more across regardless of whether or not a surface crater was formed from each test. While surface craters and otherAuthorsP. Vincent, S. Larsen, D. Galloway, R. J. Laczniak, W.R. Walter, W. Foxall, J.J. ZuccaThe containment of Soviet underground nuclear explosions
No abstract available.AuthorsVitaly V. Adushkin, William LeithTaking the Earth's pulse
During the past 35 years, scientists have developed a vast network of seismometers that record earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and nuclear explosions throughout the world. Seismographic data support disaster response, scientific research, and global security. With this network, the United States maintains world leadership in monitoring the greatest natural and technological events that threaten oAuthorsRobert L. Woodward, Harly M. Benz, William M. BrownSeismic monitoring of the RULISON underground nuclear explosion near Rifle, Colorado, on September 1969
No abstract available.AuthorsR.M. Hamilton, B.E. Smith, J. H. HealyUse of seismic intensity data to predict the effects of earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions in various geologic settings
No abstract available.AuthorsPatrick James BaroshSeismic activity and faulting associated with a large underground nuclear explosion
The 1.1-megaton nuclear test Benham caused movement on previously mapped faults and was followed by a sequence of small earthquakes. These effects were confined to a zone extending not more than 13 kilometers from ground zero; they are apparently related to the release of natural tectonic strain.AuthorsR.M. Hamilton, F. A. McKeown, J. H. HealyTraveltimes and amplitudes from nuclear explosions; Nevada Test Site to Ordway, Colorado
This paper treats the results of a study of seismic waves generated by eight nuclear explosions and recorded at 31 locations between the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and Ordway, Colorado. The line of recording stations crosses the eastern part of the Basin and Range Province, the Colorado Plateau, the southern Rocky Mountains, and extends into the Great Plains. In the eastern Basin and Range Province anAuthorsAlan Ryall, David J. StuartNuclear explosions: Some geologic effects of the gnome shot
[No abstract available]AuthorsL. M. Gard - News