Incorporating antenna detections into abundance estimates of fish
August 18, 2021
Autonomous passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag antennas are commonly used to detect fish marked with PIT tags but cannot detect unmarked fish, creating challenges for abundance estimation. Here we describe an approach to estimate abundance from paired physical capture and antenna detection data in closed and open mark-recapture models. Additionally, for open models, we develop an approach that incorporates uncertainty in fish size, because fish size changes through time (as fish grow bigger) but is unknown if fish are not physically captured (e.g., only detected on antennas). Incorporation of size uncertainty allows for estimation of size-specific abundances and demonstrates a generally useful method for obtaining state-specific abundances estimates under state uncertainty. Simulation studies comparing models with and without antenna detections illustrate that the benefit of our approach increases as a larger proportion of the population is marked. When applied to two field data sets, our approach to incorporating antenna detections reduced uncertainty in abundance substantially. We conclude that PIT antennas hold great potential for improving abundance estimation, despite the challenges they present.
Citation Information
Publication Year | 2022 |
---|---|
Title | Incorporating antenna detections into abundance estimates of fish |
DOI | 10.1139/cjfas-2021-0003 |
Authors | Maria C. Dzul, Charles Yackulic, William L. Kendall, Dana L. Winkelman, Mary M Conner, Michael D. Yard |
Publication Type | Article |
Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
Series Title | Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences |
Index ID | 70223849 |
Record Source | USGS Publications Warehouse |
USGS Organization | Southwest Biological Science Center |
Related
Humpback chub (Gila cypha) capture history data (2009-2020), Grand Canyon, Arizona
These tabular data were compiled to estimate abundance from paired physical capture and antenna detection data in closed, open, and robust design mark-recapture models. These data represent humpback chub capture histories in the Little Colorado River (LCR) and in the juvenile chub monitoring (JCM) reach of the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon, Arizona. The dataset includes multistate capture his
Maria C Dzul, PhD
Biologist
Biologist
Email
Charles B Yackulic, Ph.D.
Research Statistician
Research Statistician
Email
Phone
Related
Humpback chub (Gila cypha) capture history data (2009-2020), Grand Canyon, Arizona
These tabular data were compiled to estimate abundance from paired physical capture and antenna detection data in closed, open, and robust design mark-recapture models. These data represent humpback chub capture histories in the Little Colorado River (LCR) and in the juvenile chub monitoring (JCM) reach of the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon, Arizona. The dataset includes multistate capture his
Maria C Dzul, PhD
Biologist
Biologist
Email
Charles B Yackulic, Ph.D.
Research Statistician
Research Statistician
Email
Phone