Ken Hyer, Ph.D.
Serves as the USGS Chesapeake Bay Coordinator.
Responsible for ensuring USGS science activities are well aligned with agency and stakeholder priorities. Assists in the translation and communication of science results to ensure that science products are used by managers to inform restoration and conservation activities throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed. USGS science provides economic and ecological value to the over 18 million people who live in the area.
Professional Experience
USGS Chesapeake Bay Coordinator – 2024-present
-Works in partnership with federal, state, and local entities to identify priority science needs
-Works with scientists from across 14+ Science Centers to develop unbiased science activities that align with USGS and stakeholder priorities
-Translates and communicates USGS science to the partnership to inform restoration and conservation efforts
USGS Chesapeake Bay Associate Coordinator – 2015-2024
-Work with Coordinator to plan Chesapeake Bay science activities, based on agency and partner guidance
-Work with USGS Scientists to coordinate projects and synthesis activities
-Interacts with USGS Program Coordinators, Regions, and Science Centers to identify and coordinate resources for USGS Chesapeake Bay projects
USGS Hydrologist and Water-Quality Specialist – 2001-2015
-Oversight of Water Science Center (WSC) water-quality program
-Provide technical expertise to center managers, scientists, and technicians
-Extensive program development activities
-Lead Scientist on complex, multi-disciplinary water-resources studies
USGS Hydrologist – 2000-2001
-Lead Scientist on several complex, multi-disciplinary water-resources studies.
Education and Certifications
Ph.D. Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia
M.S. Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia
B.S. Environmental Science, Virginia Tech
Science and Products
Enhancing fecal coliform total maximum daily load models through bacterial source tracking Enhancing fecal coliform total maximum daily load models through bacterial source tracking
Patterns and sources of fecal coliform bacteria in three streams in Virginia, 1999-2000 Patterns and sources of fecal coliform bacteria in three streams in Virginia, 1999-2000
Use of the Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN and bacterial source tracking for development of the fecal coliform total maximum daily load (TMDL) for Blacks Run, Rockingham County, Virginia Use of the Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN and bacterial source tracking for development of the fecal coliform total maximum daily load (TMDL) for Blacks Run, Rockingham County, Virginia
Use of the Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN and bacterial source tracking for development of the fecal coliform total maximum daily load (TMDL) for Accotink Creek, Fairfax County, Virginia Use of the Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN and bacterial source tracking for development of the fecal coliform total maximum daily load (TMDL) for Accotink Creek, Fairfax County, Virginia
Use of the Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN and bacterial source tracking for development of the fecal coliform total maximum daily load (TMDL) for Christians Creek, Augusta County, Virginia Use of the Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN and bacterial source tracking for development of the fecal coliform total maximum daily load (TMDL) for Christians Creek, Augusta County, Virginia
Processes controlling the episodic streamwater transport of atrazine and other agrichemicals in an agricultural watershed Processes controlling the episodic streamwater transport of atrazine and other agrichemicals in an agricultural watershed
Non-USGS Publications**
ISSN: 2327-6932 (online)
ISSN: 2327-6916 (print)
ISSN: 2327-6932 (online)
and temporal variation of stream chemistry associated with contrasting geology and land-use patterns in the
Chesapeake Bay watershed—Summary of results from Smith Creek, Virginia; Upper Chester River, Maryland;
Conewago Creek, Pennsylvania; and Difficult Run, Virginia, 2010–2013: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations
Report 2016–5093, 211 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20165093.
ISSN 2328-031X (print)
ISSN 2328-0328 (online)
ISBN 978-1-4113-4085-5
regression model for reporting nutrient and sediment concentrations, fluxes, and trends in concentration
and flux for the Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Water-Quality Monitoring Network, results through water year 2012:
U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5133, 76 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20155133.
ISSN 2328-031X (print)
ISSN 2328-0328 (online)
ISBN 978-1-4113-4005-3
during construction of the Roanoke River Flood Reduction Project in Roanoke, Virginia, 2005–2012:
U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5111, 53 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20155111.
ISSN 2328-031X (print)
ISSN 2328-0328 (online)
ISBN 978-1-4113-3967-5
**Disclaimer: The views expressed in Non-USGS publications are those of the author and do not represent the views of the USGS, Department of the Interior, or the U.S. Government.
Science and Products
Enhancing fecal coliform total maximum daily load models through bacterial source tracking Enhancing fecal coliform total maximum daily load models through bacterial source tracking
Patterns and sources of fecal coliform bacteria in three streams in Virginia, 1999-2000 Patterns and sources of fecal coliform bacteria in three streams in Virginia, 1999-2000
Use of the Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN and bacterial source tracking for development of the fecal coliform total maximum daily load (TMDL) for Blacks Run, Rockingham County, Virginia Use of the Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN and bacterial source tracking for development of the fecal coliform total maximum daily load (TMDL) for Blacks Run, Rockingham County, Virginia
Use of the Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN and bacterial source tracking for development of the fecal coliform total maximum daily load (TMDL) for Accotink Creek, Fairfax County, Virginia Use of the Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN and bacterial source tracking for development of the fecal coliform total maximum daily load (TMDL) for Accotink Creek, Fairfax County, Virginia
Use of the Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN and bacterial source tracking for development of the fecal coliform total maximum daily load (TMDL) for Christians Creek, Augusta County, Virginia Use of the Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN and bacterial source tracking for development of the fecal coliform total maximum daily load (TMDL) for Christians Creek, Augusta County, Virginia
Processes controlling the episodic streamwater transport of atrazine and other agrichemicals in an agricultural watershed Processes controlling the episodic streamwater transport of atrazine and other agrichemicals in an agricultural watershed
Non-USGS Publications**
ISSN: 2327-6932 (online)
ISSN: 2327-6916 (print)
ISSN: 2327-6932 (online)
and temporal variation of stream chemistry associated with contrasting geology and land-use patterns in the
Chesapeake Bay watershed—Summary of results from Smith Creek, Virginia; Upper Chester River, Maryland;
Conewago Creek, Pennsylvania; and Difficult Run, Virginia, 2010–2013: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations
Report 2016–5093, 211 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20165093.
ISSN 2328-031X (print)
ISSN 2328-0328 (online)
ISBN 978-1-4113-4085-5
regression model for reporting nutrient and sediment concentrations, fluxes, and trends in concentration
and flux for the Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Water-Quality Monitoring Network, results through water year 2012:
U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5133, 76 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20155133.
ISSN 2328-031X (print)
ISSN 2328-0328 (online)
ISBN 978-1-4113-4005-3
during construction of the Roanoke River Flood Reduction Project in Roanoke, Virginia, 2005–2012:
U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5111, 53 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20155111.
ISSN 2328-031X (print)
ISSN 2328-0328 (online)
ISBN 978-1-4113-3967-5
**Disclaimer: The views expressed in Non-USGS publications are those of the author and do not represent the views of the USGS, Department of the Interior, or the U.S. Government.