Kevin R Milner
Kevin Milner is a Research Geophysicist with the Earthquake Hazards Program.
Kevin develops earthquake forecast models for the USGS Earthquake Hazards Program. His research interests include uncertainty quantification and reduction in seismic hazard analysis, and physics-based earthquake and ground motion simulation. With a background in both computer and geological sciences, he specializes in using high performance computing to tackle complex research problems.
Professional Experience
Research Geophysicist, USGS Geologic Hazards Science Center (2024–Present)
Computer Scientist, Southern California Earthquake Center (2008–2024)
Education and Certifications
PhD (Geological Sciences); University of Southern California, 2020
MS (Geological Sciences); University of Southern California, 2015
BS (Computer Sciences); University of Southern California, 2007
Science and Products
Operational Earthquake Forecasting – Implementing a Real-Time System for California
Data Release for the 2023 U.S. 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model - Overview
Deterministic physics-based earthquake sequence simulators match empirical ground-motion models and enable extrapolation to data poor regimes: Application to multifault multimechanism ruptures
The USGS 2023 Conterminous U.S. time‐independent earthquake rupture forecast
A comprehensive fault system inversion approach: Methods and application to NSHM23
Enumerating plausible multifault ruptures in complex fault systems with physical constraints
The seismic hazard implications of declustering and poisson assumptions inferred from a fully time‐dependent model
Improvements to the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast ETAS Model (UCERF3‐ETAS)
Toward physics-based nonergodic PSHA: A prototype fully-deterministic seismic hazard model for southern California
Generalizing the inversion‐based PSHA source model for an interconnected fault system
Pseudo-prospective evaluation of UCERF3-ETAS forecasts during the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence
Assessing the value of removing earthquake-hazard-related epistemic uncertainties, exemplified using average annual loss in California
Operational earthquake forecasting during the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence with the UCERF3-ETAS model
A physics-based earthquake simulator replicates seismic hazard statistics across California
Non-USGS Publications**
**Disclaimer: The views expressed in Non-USGS publications are those of the author and do not represent the views of the USGS, Department of the Interior, or the U.S. Government.
Science and Products
Operational Earthquake Forecasting – Implementing a Real-Time System for California
Data Release for the 2023 U.S. 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model - Overview
Deterministic physics-based earthquake sequence simulators match empirical ground-motion models and enable extrapolation to data poor regimes: Application to multifault multimechanism ruptures
The USGS 2023 Conterminous U.S. time‐independent earthquake rupture forecast
A comprehensive fault system inversion approach: Methods and application to NSHM23
Enumerating plausible multifault ruptures in complex fault systems with physical constraints
The seismic hazard implications of declustering and poisson assumptions inferred from a fully time‐dependent model
Improvements to the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast ETAS Model (UCERF3‐ETAS)
Toward physics-based nonergodic PSHA: A prototype fully-deterministic seismic hazard model for southern California
Generalizing the inversion‐based PSHA source model for an interconnected fault system
Pseudo-prospective evaluation of UCERF3-ETAS forecasts during the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence
Assessing the value of removing earthquake-hazard-related epistemic uncertainties, exemplified using average annual loss in California
Operational earthquake forecasting during the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence with the UCERF3-ETAS model
A physics-based earthquake simulator replicates seismic hazard statistics across California
Non-USGS Publications**
**Disclaimer: The views expressed in Non-USGS publications are those of the author and do not represent the views of the USGS, Department of the Interior, or the U.S. Government.