Nina Burkardt (Former Employee)
Science and Products
Filter Total Items: 13
Filter Total Items: 53
Decision analysis tools: use of the Legal-Institutional Analysis Model: Chapter 9
No abstract available.
Authors
B. L. Lamb, N. Burkardt, D. Lybecker
Desire to bargain and negotiation success: lessons about the need to negotiate from six hydropower disputes
We investigated the notion that successful negotiations require that all parties to the dispute must have a desire to bargain. This desire is most likely to be present when the dispute exhibits ripeness and each party believes a bargained solution is the most cost-effective way to resolve differences. Structured interviews of participants in six Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hydropower lice
Authors
Nina Burkardt, Berton Lee Lamb, Jonathan G. Taylor
A policy model to initiate environmental negotiations: Three hydropower workshops
How do I get started in natural resource negotiations? Natural resource managers often face difficult negotiations when they implement laws and policies regulating such resources as water, wildlife, wetlands, endangered species, and recreation. As a result of these negotiations, managers must establish rules, grant permits, or create management plans. The Legal‐Institutional Analysis Model (LIAM)
Authors
Berton Lee Lamb, Jonathan G. Taylor, Nina Burkardt, Phadrea D. Ponds
Power distribution in complex environmental negotiations: Does balance matter?
We studied six interagency negotiations covering Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) hydroelectric power licenses. Negotiations occurred between state and federal resource agencies and developers over project operations and natural resource mitigation. We postulated that a balance of power among parties was necessary for successful negotiations. We found a complex relationship between bala
Authors
N. Burkardt, B. L. Lamb, J.G. Taylor
What makes a hydropower negotiation successful?
No abstract available.
Authors
J.G. Taylor, B. L. Lamb, N. Burkardt, S. Flick
Quants and wonks in environmental disputes: Are scientists experts or advocates?
No abstract available.
Authors
Berton Lee Lamb, N. Burkardt, J.G. Taylor
Rules for success in environmental negotiations
Scientists at the Mid-Continent Ecological Science Center of the National Biological Service conducted a series of case studies of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission license consultations. The goal of these studies was to test hypotheses about factors that contribute to success in interagency negotiations. Based on their analysis of six case studies, the researchers constructed a list of ten "ru
Authors
J.G. Taylor, N. Burkardt, B. L. Lamb
Technical clarity in inter-agency negotiations: Lessons from four hydropower projects
We investigated the effect of technical clarity on success in multi-party negotiations in the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) licensing process. Technical clarity is the shared understanding of dimensions such as the geographic extent of the project, range of flows to be considered, important species and life stages, and variety of water uses considered. The results of four hydropower
Authors
Nina Burkardt, Berton Lee Lamb, Jonathan G. Taylor, Terry J. Waddle
Technical understanding in successful environmental negotiations
No abstract available.
Authors
N. Burkardt, B. L. Lamb, T. Waddle
Tailoring research findings to meet user needs: lessons from a facilitated focus group
No abstract available.
Authors
N. Burkardt
The evaluating decision processes study: lessons from a facilitated focus group
No abstract available.
Authors
N. Burkardt
Legal considerations in inland fisheries management
No abstract available.
Authors
B. L. Lamb, B. A. K. Coughlan
Non-USGS Publications**
**Disclaimer: The views expressed in Non-USGS publications are those of the author and do not represent the views of the USGS, Department of the Interior, or the U.S. Government.
Science and Products
Filter Total Items: 13
Filter Total Items: 53
Decision analysis tools: use of the Legal-Institutional Analysis Model: Chapter 9
No abstract available.
Authors
B. L. Lamb, N. Burkardt, D. Lybecker
Desire to bargain and negotiation success: lessons about the need to negotiate from six hydropower disputes
We investigated the notion that successful negotiations require that all parties to the dispute must have a desire to bargain. This desire is most likely to be present when the dispute exhibits ripeness and each party believes a bargained solution is the most cost-effective way to resolve differences. Structured interviews of participants in six Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hydropower lice
Authors
Nina Burkardt, Berton Lee Lamb, Jonathan G. Taylor
A policy model to initiate environmental negotiations: Three hydropower workshops
How do I get started in natural resource negotiations? Natural resource managers often face difficult negotiations when they implement laws and policies regulating such resources as water, wildlife, wetlands, endangered species, and recreation. As a result of these negotiations, managers must establish rules, grant permits, or create management plans. The Legal‐Institutional Analysis Model (LIAM)
Authors
Berton Lee Lamb, Jonathan G. Taylor, Nina Burkardt, Phadrea D. Ponds
Power distribution in complex environmental negotiations: Does balance matter?
We studied six interagency negotiations covering Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) hydroelectric power licenses. Negotiations occurred between state and federal resource agencies and developers over project operations and natural resource mitigation. We postulated that a balance of power among parties was necessary for successful negotiations. We found a complex relationship between bala
Authors
N. Burkardt, B. L. Lamb, J.G. Taylor
What makes a hydropower negotiation successful?
No abstract available.
Authors
J.G. Taylor, B. L. Lamb, N. Burkardt, S. Flick
Quants and wonks in environmental disputes: Are scientists experts or advocates?
No abstract available.
Authors
Berton Lee Lamb, N. Burkardt, J.G. Taylor
Rules for success in environmental negotiations
Scientists at the Mid-Continent Ecological Science Center of the National Biological Service conducted a series of case studies of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission license consultations. The goal of these studies was to test hypotheses about factors that contribute to success in interagency negotiations. Based on their analysis of six case studies, the researchers constructed a list of ten "ru
Authors
J.G. Taylor, N. Burkardt, B. L. Lamb
Technical clarity in inter-agency negotiations: Lessons from four hydropower projects
We investigated the effect of technical clarity on success in multi-party negotiations in the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) licensing process. Technical clarity is the shared understanding of dimensions such as the geographic extent of the project, range of flows to be considered, important species and life stages, and variety of water uses considered. The results of four hydropower
Authors
Nina Burkardt, Berton Lee Lamb, Jonathan G. Taylor, Terry J. Waddle
Technical understanding in successful environmental negotiations
No abstract available.
Authors
N. Burkardt, B. L. Lamb, T. Waddle
Tailoring research findings to meet user needs: lessons from a facilitated focus group
No abstract available.
Authors
N. Burkardt
The evaluating decision processes study: lessons from a facilitated focus group
No abstract available.
Authors
N. Burkardt
Legal considerations in inland fisheries management
No abstract available.
Authors
B. L. Lamb, B. A. K. Coughlan
Non-USGS Publications**
**Disclaimer: The views expressed in Non-USGS publications are those of the author and do not represent the views of the USGS, Department of the Interior, or the U.S. Government.