Non-native Phragmites australis (Common Reed) has become established across the Great Lakes basin, outcompeting native plants and degrading natural habitats. Phragmites is managed using a variety of resource-intensive techniques, yet effectiveness of treatment may vary due to infestation level, application methods, environmental conditions, or other factors. With the goal to reduce uncertainty in treatment outcomes, the Great Lakes Phragmites Collaborative formed the Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework (PAMF), an adaptive management and collective learning program. PAMF partners with managers who collect Phragmites monitoring and treatment data on a yearly basis to inform the PAMF predictive model, which in turn provides managers with data-driven, site-specific management guidance for the following year. After 5 years of operation, PAMF is expanding to target its ‘most-wanted’ management actions, or those with little previously submitted data, using active adaptive management. Intentional implementation of the less used management combinations in PAMF will accelerate model learning and progress toward data-driven best management practices.
The Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework (PAMF) is an adaptive management program led by the Great Lakes Commission and assisted by the USGS Great Lakes Science Center and the University of Georgia that relies on participatory data from Phragmites managers throughout the Great Lakes basin. PAMF is designed to learn from the management actions of participating managers through a standardized data collection and submission process. The PAMF predictive model is run annually in August and structured to learn about the efficacy and efficiency of 10 management actions combined into 16 unique management combinations. These combinations are timing specific, with one management combination implemented during each of the three biological phases of Phragmites (translocation phase in the late summer-fall, dormant phase in the winter and early spring, and growing phase in the late spring-summer).
In return for the data that participants submit, the PAMF model provides participants with predictive guidance on specific management combinations that are most likely to maximize efficiency and efficacy for each unit enrolled and active over the next 12 months. This iterative process repeats annually, and the model improves with each subsequent cycle. The management guidance informed by data will continue to reduce the uncertainty surrounding management outcomes, eventually leading to improved best management practices for Phragmites management across the Great Lakes and beyond.
More full data packages are needed to accelerate model learning. Out of the 16 management combinations that PAMF tracks, 8 combinations (as of 2022) have been identified by the model as priority combinations (listed in order of biological phase: translocating, dormant, growing) for which we seek additional data, including:
- Imazapyr, Rest (do nothing), Rest
- Cut underwater, Rest, Cut underwater
- Spading, Rest, Spading
- Glyphosate, Remove biomass, Rest
- Glyphosate, Rest, Glyphosate
- Glyphosate, Pre-flood clearing, Flood
- Glyphosate, Flood, Flood
- Rest, Pre-flood clearing, Flood
To reduce the uncertainty on the above management combinations, the Great Lakes Commission seeks to provide funding to Phragmites managers participating in PAMF who are planning to implement the priority combinations. Funding requirements for applicants and additional details are forthcoming.
The Great Lakes Phragmites Collaborative (GLPC), coordinated by the Great Lakes Commission, acts as the umbrella organization through which PAMF is administered and promotes the value of PAMF through its Common Agenda. The GLPC continues to support the program, encourage involvement, and share lessons learned throughout the greater Phragmites community.
This project is part of the USGS Great Lakes Science Center’s wetlands research. Visit our page Innovative Approaches for Wetland Restoration and Invasive Species Management to learn about more collaborative research projects.
Data related to the Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework research
Land cover classifications and associated data from treatment areas enrolled in the Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework, 2018
Publications related to the Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework research
Using uncrewed aerial vehicles for identifying the extent of invasive Phragmites australis in treatment areas enrolled in an adaptive management program
Applying the collective impact approach to address non-native species: A case study of the Great Lakes Phragmites Collaborative
Software related to the Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework research
Annual Management Unit Summary Code
Partners in the Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework research
- Overview
Non-native Phragmites australis (Common Reed) has become established across the Great Lakes basin, outcompeting native plants and degrading natural habitats. Phragmites is managed using a variety of resource-intensive techniques, yet effectiveness of treatment may vary due to infestation level, application methods, environmental conditions, or other factors. With the goal to reduce uncertainty in treatment outcomes, the Great Lakes Phragmites Collaborative formed the Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework (PAMF), an adaptive management and collective learning program. PAMF partners with managers who collect Phragmites monitoring and treatment data on a yearly basis to inform the PAMF predictive model, which in turn provides managers with data-driven, site-specific management guidance for the following year. After 5 years of operation, PAMF is expanding to target its ‘most-wanted’ management actions, or those with little previously submitted data, using active adaptive management. Intentional implementation of the less used management combinations in PAMF will accelerate model learning and progress toward data-driven best management practices.
The Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework (PAMF) is an adaptive management program led by the Great Lakes Commission and assisted by the USGS Great Lakes Science Center and the University of Georgia that relies on participatory data from Phragmites managers throughout the Great Lakes basin. PAMF is designed to learn from the management actions of participating managers through a standardized data collection and submission process. The PAMF predictive model is run annually in August and structured to learn about the efficacy and efficiency of 10 management actions combined into 16 unique management combinations. These combinations are timing specific, with one management combination implemented during each of the three biological phases of Phragmites (translocation phase in the late summer-fall, dormant phase in the winter and early spring, and growing phase in the late spring-summer).
In return for the data that participants submit, the PAMF model provides participants with predictive guidance on specific management combinations that are most likely to maximize efficiency and efficacy for each unit enrolled and active over the next 12 months. This iterative process repeats annually, and the model improves with each subsequent cycle. The management guidance informed by data will continue to reduce the uncertainty surrounding management outcomes, eventually leading to improved best management practices for Phragmites management across the Great Lakes and beyond.
Trajectory of the Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework (PAMF). Over time, Phragmites managers contribute data to inform the PAMF Model, which becomes less reliant on expert opinion used to build the Model and more reliant on field data. As the volume of participant data increases, management uncertainty decreases with the identification of best management practices for Phragmites across the Great Lakes basin. Credit: Taaja Tucker-Silva, USGS More full data packages are needed to accelerate model learning. Out of the 16 management combinations that PAMF tracks, 8 combinations (as of 2022) have been identified by the model as priority combinations (listed in order of biological phase: translocating, dormant, growing) for which we seek additional data, including:
- Imazapyr, Rest (do nothing), Rest
- Cut underwater, Rest, Cut underwater
- Spading, Rest, Spading
- Glyphosate, Remove biomass, Rest
- Glyphosate, Rest, Glyphosate
- Glyphosate, Pre-flood clearing, Flood
- Glyphosate, Flood, Flood
- Rest, Pre-flood clearing, Flood
USGS Biologist Wes Bickford cutting invasive Phragmites australis underwater. Credit: Spencer Widin, USGS To reduce the uncertainty on the above management combinations, the Great Lakes Commission seeks to provide funding to Phragmites managers participating in PAMF who are planning to implement the priority combinations. Funding requirements for applicants and additional details are forthcoming.
The Great Lakes Phragmites Collaborative (GLPC), coordinated by the Great Lakes Commission, acts as the umbrella organization through which PAMF is administered and promotes the value of PAMF through its Common Agenda. The GLPC continues to support the program, encourage involvement, and share lessons learned throughout the greater Phragmites community.
This project is part of the USGS Great Lakes Science Center’s wetlands research. Visit our page Innovative Approaches for Wetland Restoration and Invasive Species Management to learn about more collaborative research projects.
- Data
Data related to the Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework research
Land cover classifications and associated data from treatment areas enrolled in the Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework, 2018
During 2018, uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs or 'drones') were used to collect spatially referenced aerial imagery from 20 management units (sites) enrolled in the Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework, a collective learning program developed by the Great Lakes Phragmites Collaborative. Management units were located in Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin (USA). Invasive Phragmites australis (hereafter - Publications
Publications related to the Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework research
Using uncrewed aerial vehicles for identifying the extent of invasive Phragmites australis in treatment areas enrolled in an adaptive management program
Higher spatial and temporal resolutions of remote sensing data are likely to be useful for ecological monitoring efforts. There are many different treatment approaches for the introduced European genotype of Phragmites australis, and adaptive management principles are being integrated in at least some long-term monitoring efforts. In this paper, we investigated how natural color and a smaller setAuthorsColin N. Brooks, Charlotte B. Weinstein, Andrew F. Poley, Amanda G. Grimm, Nicholas P. Marion, Laura Bourgeau-Chavez, Dana Hansen, Kurt P. KowalskiApplying the collective impact approach to address non-native species: A case study of the Great Lakes Phragmites Collaborative
To address the invasion of non-native Phragmites in the Great Lakes, researchers at the U.S. Geological Survey—Great Lakes Science Center partnered with the Great Lakes Commission in 2012 to establish the Great Lakes Phragmites Collaborative (GLPC). The GLPC is a regional-scale partnership established to improve collaboration among stakeholders and increase the effectiveness of non-native PhragmitAuthorsH. B. Braun, Kurt P. Kowalski, K. Hollins - Software
Software related to the Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework research
Annual Management Unit Summary Code
The Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework (PAMF) is an adaptive management program created to improve the efficacy and efficiency of Phragmites management efforts throughout the Great Lakes region. Managers enroll Phragmites stands, report the management techniques they used, and monitor the invasion status of Phragmites on their site (management unit - MU). Through a systematic approach, PAMF - Partners
Partners in the Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework research