The sandbars exposed along the shoreline of the Colorado River represent only a small fraction of the sand deposits in Grand Canyon, most of which are on the bed of the river in eddies and the channel. Current management practice includes efforts to maintain and build sandbars by releasing high flows from Glen Canyon Dam that are timed to coincide with periods of fine-sediment supply from tributaries (High-flow Protocol Environmental Assessment). The success of this approach to build sandbars depends on the maintenance of a sufficient supply of sand within the channel for rebuilding sandbars. The purpose of the sediment-storage monitoring project is to track long-term trends in sand storage and thereby provide a robust measure of whether or not the supply of sand available for building sandbars is increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable over time-scales of years to decades.
Monitoring Sediment Storage
We measure changes in sediment storage directly by making repeat topographic maps of the river bed and banks. The maps are made by surveying exposed sediment deposits with conventional total station. These measurements involve the use of a survey instrument set on a known benchmark to measure the location and elevation of points on the ground selected by a rodman equipped with a reflective target. However, most of the sediment is underwater and is measured with sonar. Multibeam sonar is the most efficient method, because it is capable of mapping wide swaths of the riverbed. Singlebeam sonar measures depths directly below the instrument and is used to map areas too shallow for the multibeam equipment, but too deep for conventional survey. All of the sonar measurements are positioned by shore-based robotic total stations that track boat position in real time. GPS is not used for any of the measurements, because satellite signals are not sufficiently reliable in the deep canyon environment.
Complementary measurements of changes in sediment storage are also made by measuring sediment concentration in the water (Discharge, Sediment, and Water Quality Monitoring).
Recent Findings
Initial results from efforts to monitor long-term trends in sediment storage indicate that storage did not decline between 2002 and 2009. This period was one of average to above average tributary sand inputs and average to below average release of water from Glen Canyon Dam. These findings are based on a period that was favorable to sand accumulation. Periods when dam release volumes are greater and tributary sediment inputs are less frequent will likely result in less sand accumulation. Recent results have also demonstrated that measurements of channel change made in short reaches (less than a few miles in length) can be used to track changes in deposits and transfers of sand among the storage locations, but the results cannot be extrapolated to long segments of the river (over 10 miles in length), because the size and distribution of sand storage locations is highly variable.
Resources
Web application for viewing maps of the river bed: https://grandcanyon.usgs.gov/portal/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=a599ee6e49be4adcbb7f042bcf0fb544
Below are other science projects associated with this project.
River Geomorphology and Geomorphic Change
River Campsites in Grand Canyon National Park
High-Flow Experiments on the Colorado River
Grand Canyon Sandbar Monitoring
Below are publications associated with this project.
Channel mapping river miles 29–62 of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, May 2009
Building sandbars in the Grand Canyon
Use of flux and morphologic sediment budgets for sandbar monitoring on the Colorado River in Marble Canyon, Arizona
Monitoring fine-sediment volume in the Colorado River ecosystem, Arizona: construction and analysis of digital elevation models
A sand budget for Marble Canyon, Arizona: implications for long-term monitoring of sand storage change
Linking morphodynamic response with sediment mass balance on the Colorado River in Marble Canyon: issues of scale, geomorphic setting, and sampling design
Sandbar Response in Marble and Grand Canyons, Arizona, Following the 2008 High-Flow Experiment on the Colorado River
Is there enough sand? Evaluating the fate of Grand Canyon sandbars
The rate and pattern of bed incision and bank adjustment on the Colorado River in Glen Canyon downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, 1956-2000
- Overview
The sandbars exposed along the shoreline of the Colorado River represent only a small fraction of the sand deposits in Grand Canyon, most of which are on the bed of the river in eddies and the channel. Current management practice includes efforts to maintain and build sandbars by releasing high flows from Glen Canyon Dam that are timed to coincide with periods of fine-sediment supply from tributaries (High-flow Protocol Environmental Assessment). The success of this approach to build sandbars depends on the maintenance of a sufficient supply of sand within the channel for rebuilding sandbars. The purpose of the sediment-storage monitoring project is to track long-term trends in sand storage and thereby provide a robust measure of whether or not the supply of sand available for building sandbars is increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable over time-scales of years to decades.
Monitoring Sediment Storage
Boat equipped with singlebeam sonar for mapping the bed of a river at shallow depths along the shoreline of the Colorado River. (Credit: USGS. Public domain.) We measure changes in sediment storage directly by making repeat topographic maps of the river bed and banks. The maps are made by surveying exposed sediment deposits with conventional total station. These measurements involve the use of a survey instrument set on a known benchmark to measure the location and elevation of points on the ground selected by a rodman equipped with a reflective target. However, most of the sediment is underwater and is measured with sonar. Multibeam sonar is the most efficient method, because it is capable of mapping wide swaths of the riverbed. Singlebeam sonar measures depths directly below the instrument and is used to map areas too shallow for the multibeam equipment, but too deep for conventional survey. All of the sonar measurements are positioned by shore-based robotic total stations that track boat position in real time. GPS is not used for any of the measurements, because satellite signals are not sufficiently reliable in the deep canyon environment.
Complementary measurements of changes in sediment storage are also made by measuring sediment concentration in the water (Discharge, Sediment, and Water Quality Monitoring).
Recent Findings
Visualization of map of riverbed and canyon walls near Navajo Bridge, 4.5 miles downstream from Lees Ferry, Arizona. River bathymetry was measured with multibeam sonar and topography was measured with a boat-mounted laser scanner. The data from this survey collected in April 2016 will be used to measure changes in sand storage on the river bed and to model streamflow and sand transport. (Credit: USGS, Public domain.) Initial results from efforts to monitor long-term trends in sediment storage indicate that storage did not decline between 2002 and 2009. This period was one of average to above average tributary sand inputs and average to below average release of water from Glen Canyon Dam. These findings are based on a period that was favorable to sand accumulation. Periods when dam release volumes are greater and tributary sediment inputs are less frequent will likely result in less sand accumulation. Recent results have also demonstrated that measurements of channel change made in short reaches (less than a few miles in length) can be used to track changes in deposits and transfers of sand among the storage locations, but the results cannot be extrapolated to long segments of the river (over 10 miles in length), because the size and distribution of sand storage locations is highly variable.
Resources
Web application for viewing maps of the river bed: https://grandcanyon.usgs.gov/portal/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=a599ee6e49be4adcbb7f042bcf0fb544
Perspective view of digital elevation model of the bed and banks of the Colorado River about 44 miles downstream from Lees Ferry, Arizona. Between 2009 and 2012, it is possible to see erosion of sediment from the bed of the river in the channel and erosion of sediment from the sandbar on the bank. The direction of streamflow is from the upper left to lower right and the river is about 450 feet wide at the widest point in this view. (Credit: USGS. Public domain.) - Science
Below are other science projects associated with this project.
River Geomorphology and Geomorphic Change
River channels and their adjacent floodplains are ever evolving in form and composition in response to changing patterns of streamflow, the quantity and size of supplied sediment, and feedbacks with the riparian and aquatic ecosystems. Changes in channel form affect aquatic and riparian habitats, which are important for plants, animals, and insects. Erosion and deposition of river channels and...River Campsites in Grand Canyon National Park
Sandbars have been used as campsites by river runners and hikers since the first expeditions to the region more than 100 years ago. Sandbar campsites continue to be an important part of the recreational experience for the more than 25,000 hikers and river runners that visit the Colorado River corridor each year. Because the Colorado River is dominated by bedrock cliffs and steep talus slopes...High-Flow Experiments on the Colorado River
Glen Canyon Dam has altered flow and fine sediment (sand, silt, and clay) dynamics of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Before the dam, the Colorado River experienced highly variable flows and carried a large amount of sediment through Grand Canyon, which maintained sandbars (highly valued camping areas in Grand Canyon) and provided sand that protected archeological and cultural sites from...Grand Canyon Sandbar Monitoring
Since the completion of Glen Canyon Dam in 1963, the amount of sand supplied to Grand Canyon National Park has been reduced by more than 90 percent. The Paria River, a tributary to the Colorado River 15 miles downstream from the dam, is now the single most important supplier of sand to the Colorado River within the Park. This large reduction in sand supply has resulted in substantial decrease in... - Publications
Below are publications associated with this project.
Channel mapping river miles 29–62 of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, May 2009
Bathymetric, topographic, and grain-size data were collected in May 2009 along a 33-mi reach of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. The study reach is located from river miles 29 to 62 at the confluence of the Colorado and Little Colorado Rivers. Channel bathymetry was mapped using multibeam and singlebeam echosounders, subaerial topography was mapped using ground-based totaAuthorsMatt Kaplinski, Joseph E. Hazel, Paul E. Grams, Keith Kohl, Daniel D. Buscombe, Robert B. TussoBuilding sandbars in the Grand Canyon
In 1963, the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation finished building Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado River in northern Arizona, 25 kilometers upstream from Grand Canyon National Park. The dam impounded 300 kilometers of the Colorado River, creating Lake Powell, the nation’s second largest reservoir. By 1974, scientists found that the downstream river’s alluvial sandbars were erodAuthorsPaul E. Grams, John C. Schmidt, Scott A. Wright, David Topping, Theodore S. Melis, David M. RubinUse of flux and morphologic sediment budgets for sandbar monitoring on the Colorado River in Marble Canyon, Arizona
The magnitude and pfattern of streamflow and sediment supply of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon (Figure 1) has been affected by the existence and operations of Glen Canyon Dam since filling of Lake Powell Reservoir began in March 1963. In the subsequent 30 years, fine sediment was scoured from the downstream channel (Topping et al., 2000; Grams et al., 2007), resulting in a decline in the numbeAuthorsPaul E. Grams, Daniel D. Buscombe, David J. Topping, Joseph E. Hazel, Matt KaplinskiMonitoring fine-sediment volume in the Colorado River ecosystem, Arizona: construction and analysis of digital elevation models
Digital elevation models (DEMs) of eleven 2–5 kilometer reaches of the Colorado River ecosystem (CRE) in Grand Canyon were constructed from repeat bathymetric and topographic surveys collected between August 2000 and December 2004. The DEMs will be used by researchers to study the effects of Glen Canyon Dam (GCD) operations on the sediment resources of the CRE in Grand Canyon by quantifying morphoAuthorsMatt Kaplinski, Joseph E. Hazel, Paul E. Grams, Philip A. DavisA sand budget for Marble Canyon, Arizona: implications for long-term monitoring of sand storage change
Recent U.S. Geological Survey research is providing important insights into how best to monitor changes in the amount of tributary-derived sand stored on the bed of the Colorado River and in eddies in Marble Canyon, Arizona. Before the construction of Glen Canyon Dam and other dams upstream, sandbars in Glen, Marble, and Grand Canyons were replenished each year by sediment-rich floods. Sand inputAuthorsPaul E. GramsLinking morphodynamic response with sediment mass balance on the Colorado River in Marble Canyon: issues of scale, geomorphic setting, and sampling design
Measurements of morphologic change are often used to infer sediment mass balance. Such measurements may, however, result in gross errors when morphologic changes over short reaches are extrapolated to predict changes in sediment mass balance for long river segments. This issue is investigated by examination of morphologic change and sediment influx and efflux for a 100 km segment of the Colorado RAuthorsPaul E. Grams, David J. Topping, John C. Schmidt, Joseph E. Hazel, Matt KaplinskiSandbar Response in Marble and Grand Canyons, Arizona, Following the 2008 High-Flow Experiment on the Colorado River
A 60-hour release of water at 1,203 cubic meters per second (m3/s) from Glen Canyon Dam in March 2008 provided an opportunity to analyze channel-margin response at discharge levels above the normal, diurnally fluctuating releases for hydropower plant operations. We compare measurements at sandbars and associated campsites along the mainstem Colorado River, downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, at 57 loAuthorsJoseph E. Hazel, Paul E. Grams, John C. Schmidt, Matt KaplinskiIs there enough sand? Evaluating the fate of Grand Canyon sandbars
Large dams have the potential to dramatically alter the flow regime, geomorphology, and aquatic ecosystem of downstream river reaches. Development of flow release regimes in order to meet multiple objectives is a challenge facing dam operators, resource managers, and scientists. Herein, we review previous work and present new analyses related to the effects of Glen Canyon Dam on the downstream reaAuthorsS.A. Wright, J. C. Schmidt, Theodore S. Melis, D.J. Topping, D. M. RubinThe rate and pattern of bed incision and bank adjustment on the Colorado River in Glen Canyon downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, 1956-2000
Closure of Glen Canyon Dam in 1963 transformed the Colorado River by reducing the magnitude and duration of spring floods, increasing the magnitude of base flows, and trapping fine sediment delivered from the upper watershed. These changes caused the channel downstream in Glen Canyon to incise, armor, and narrow. This study synthesizes over 45 yr of channel-change measurements and demonstrates thaAuthorsP.E. Grams, J. C. Schmidt, D.J. Topping