Diagnostic and field data from the Eastern Migratory Whooping Crane Population
June 18, 2020
Detailed data collected from the field and generated during diagnostic evaluation of whooping crane carcasses from the Eastern Migratory Population.
Citation Information
| Publication Year | 2020 |
|---|---|
| Title | Diagnostic and field data from the Eastern Migratory Whooping Crane Population |
| DOI | 10.5066/P9MR4XN4 |
| Authors | Taylor J. Yaw, Kimberli J Miller, Julia S Lankton, Barry K. Hartup |
| Product Type | Data Release |
| Record Source | USGS Asset Identifier Service (AIS) |
| USGS Organization | National Wildlife Health Center |
| Rights | This work is marked with CC0 1.0 Universal |
Related Content
Diagnostic and field data from the Eastern Migratory Whooping Crane Population
Detailed data collected from the field and generated during diagnostic evaluation of whooping crane carcasses from the Eastern Migratory Population.
Postmortem evaluation of reintroduced migratory whooping cranes (Grus americana) in eastern North America
We reviewed necropsy records of 124 Whooping Cranes (Grus americana) recovered following reintroduction of 268 individuals from 2001 to 2016 in the eastern US. Causes of death were determined in 62% (77/124) of cases facilitated by active monitoring that limited decomposition and scavenging artifact. The greatest proportions of mortality were caused by predation (0.468; 95% confidence interval 0.3
Authors
Taylor J. Yaw, Kimberli J.G. Miller, Julia S. Lankton, Barry K. Hartup
Related Content
Diagnostic and field data from the Eastern Migratory Whooping Crane Population
Detailed data collected from the field and generated during diagnostic evaluation of whooping crane carcasses from the Eastern Migratory Population.
Postmortem evaluation of reintroduced migratory whooping cranes (Grus americana) in eastern North America
We reviewed necropsy records of 124 Whooping Cranes (Grus americana) recovered following reintroduction of 268 individuals from 2001 to 2016 in the eastern US. Causes of death were determined in 62% (77/124) of cases facilitated by active monitoring that limited decomposition and scavenging artifact. The greatest proportions of mortality were caused by predation (0.468; 95% confidence interval 0.3
Authors
Taylor J. Yaw, Kimberli J.G. Miller, Julia S. Lankton, Barry K. Hartup