Publications
Filter Total Items: 2407
New developments at the Center for Engineering Strong-Motion Data (CESMD) New developments at the Center for Engineering Strong-Motion Data (CESMD)
The Center for Engineering Strong-Motion Data (CESMD), an internationally utilized joint center of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the California Geological Survey (CGS), provides a single access point for earthquake strong-motion records and station metadata from the CGS California Strong-Motion Instrumentation Program (CSMIP), the USGS National Strong-Motion Project (NSMP), the...
Authors
Lijam Hagos, Hamid Haddadi, Lisa Sue Schleicher, Jamison Haase Steidl, Eric M. Thompson, Heather Crume, M. Dhar, N. Leue
Challenges in developing vertical hazard for seismic analysis of concrete dams Challenges in developing vertical hazard for seismic analysis of concrete dams
The seismic response of concrete dams depends on both the horizontal (H) and vertical (V) components of ground motion (GM), and excluding the V components when conducting response history analyses (RHAs) may underestimate the seismic fragility. Although V components of GM time series could be selected to be consistent with the hazard, hazard curves for the V component (or for short, V...
Authors
N. Simon Kwong, Sanaz Rezaeian, Andrew James Makdisi, Nico Luco
Development of USGS NSHMs: Do small changes in hazard imply small changes in risk? Development of USGS NSHMs: Do small changes in hazard imply small changes in risk?
One of the flagship products from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is the National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM). Since 1976, the NSHM has been periodically updated to reflect newly published earthquake science and provide probabilistic estimates of seismic hazard for the United States. During each update cycle, alternative models are deliberated, analyzed, and documented through logic...
Authors
N. Simon Kwong, Kishor S. Jaiswal
International data gaps at the Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data International data gaps at the Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data
The Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data (CESMD) is utilized by seismologists, engineers, and disaster management professionals in the US and has historically achieved and distributed waveforms from across the globe for significant earthquakes. The increased access to the waveforms via Web API (Application Programming Interface) offers a unique opportunity to provide the community...
Authors
Han Shao, Jeff Brody, Lisa Sue Schleicher, Kristin Marano, Jamison Haase Steidl, Eric M. Thompson, Mike Hearne, James Luke Blair
Site-specific, extended ShakeMaps for earthquake engineering applications Site-specific, extended ShakeMaps for earthquake engineering applications
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) routinely produces ShakeMaps of shaking intensity across the globe. Due to practical constraints, the number of response spectral periods was limited to three standard periods (0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 sec). We have recently developed the tools that are necessary to expand this functionality to include 22 periods (matching the current U.S. National Seismic...
Authors
Eric M. Thompson, Mike Hearne, Charles Worden, Vince Quitoriano, Annabelle Elizabeth Cunningham, David J. Wald
The 2023 U.S. 50-state National Seismic Hazard Model: Changes in 2023 compared to 2018 ground motions The 2023 U.S. 50-state National Seismic Hazard Model: Changes in 2023 compared to 2018 ground motions
We present the 2023 U.S. National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) for all 50 states that applies new smoothed seismicity, fault rupture, and ground motion models. New data and methods are introduced in the 2023 earthquake rupture forecast that include: new earthquake catalogs - excluding induced earthquakes, alternative declustering methods, spatially smoothed seismicity distributions, full...
Authors
Mark D. Petersen, Jason M. Altekruse, Oliver S. Boyd, Demi Leafar Girot, Julie A. Herrick, Kishor S. Jaiswal, N. Simon Kwong, Andrea L. Llenos, Kevin Millner, Morgan P. Moschetti, Peter M. Powers, Sanaz Rezaeian, Justin L. Rubinstein, Kenneth S. Rukstales, Allison M. Shumway
Effective site coefficients for the 2024 International Building Code (IBC) Effective site coefficients for the 2024 International Building Code (IBC)
The U.S. National Seismic Hazard Models (NSHMs), developed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), have long been the scientific foundation of seismic design guidelines and have been used to compute design ground motions for construction of new buildings and retrofit of existing buildings in the United States and its territories. The 2018 NSHM is adopted by the 2024 International Building...
Authors
Sanaz Rezaeian, Nico Luco, Andrew James Makdisi, Henry Mason
Simulated ground-motion records for the seismic assessment of monumental masonry structures Simulated ground-motion records for the seismic assessment of monumental masonry structures
Earthquakes are natural disasters that can cause widespread devastation and loss of life. Simulated ground-motion records can be useful in regions with limited seismic stations or a history of damaging but infrequent earthquakes. This is especially true in areas with a high concentration of heritage masonry structures, which are especially susceptible to damage, as simulated records can...
Authors
Shaghayegh Karimzadeh, Marco F. Funari, Simon Szabó, S. M. Sajad Hussaini, Sanaz Rezaeian, Paulo B. Lourenço
Developing international standards and guidelines for disseminating and validating simulated ground motions Developing international standards and guidelines for disseminating and validating simulated ground motions
We are leading an effort to develop international standards and guidelines for curating, disseminating, and validating simulated ground-motion data. This effort is organized as a working group within the Consortium of Organizations for Strong Motion Observation Systems (COSMOS). In 2022 we held online workshops on 7 and 8 June and 20 October. The first workshop focused on curating and
Authors
Aysegul Askan, Brad T. Aagaard, Sanaz Rezaeian, Sean Kamran Ahdi, Alan Yong
Seismic response comparison of a historical masonry church subject to real and simulated ground motions Seismic response comparison of a historical masonry church subject to real and simulated ground motions
In recent years, advanced numerical models and high-performance computing have facilitated the utilization of ground motion time series in the assessment of the non-linear dynamic behavior of historic masonry structures. Since recorded accelerograms can be sparse for specific analysis conditions, stochastic ground motion simulations have become a viable alternative to overcome this...
Authors
S. M. Sajad Hussaini, Claudio Sebastiani, Monica Capasso, Valerio Sabbatini, Shaghayegh Karimzadeh, Sanaz Rezaeian, Silvia Santini, Paulo B. Lourenço
Methods to evaluate and improve the modeling of rupture directivity in assessment of seismic hazard Methods to evaluate and improve the modeling of rupture directivity in assessment of seismic hazard
In recent years, there have been several advancements related to the modelling of near-source effects of earthquake rupture on strong ground shaking, leading to an improved characterization of ground motions and resulting seismic hazard. Some of these modifications have stemmed from physics-based numerical modelling of the earthquake rupture process, using physics-based dynamic rupture...
Authors
Kyle B. Withers, Brian Kelly, Jeff Bayless, Morgan P. Moschetti
Limited preservation of strike-slip surface displacement in the geomorphic record Limited preservation of strike-slip surface displacement in the geomorphic record
Offset geomorphic markers are commonly used to interpret slip history of strike-slip faults and have played an important role in forming earthquake recurrence models. These data sets are typically analyzed using cumulative probability methods to interpret average amounts of slip in past earthquakes. However, interpretation of the geomorphic record to infer surface slip history is...
Authors
Nadine G. Reitman, Yann Klinger, Richard W. Briggs, Ryan D. Gold