Andy Royle, Ph.D.
Andy Royle is a Research Statistician at the Eastern Ecological Science Center in Laurel, MD.
Andy Royle is a Senior Scientist at USGS Eastern Ecological Science Center (Patuxent). At EESC, he is engaged in the development of statistical methods and analytic tools for animal demographic modeling, statistical inference and sampling wildlife populations and communities. His current research is focused on hierarchical models of animal abundance and occurrence, and the development of spatial capture-recapture methods and applications. He has authored or coauthored 6 books on quantitative analysis in ecology including the recent book Applied Hierarchical Models Vols. 1 and 2 (2016 and 2021, with Marc Kéry).
Professional Experience
Statistician (1998-2004) for the U.S. FWS in the Migratory Bird Management Office where he worked primarily on waterfowl surveys and monitoring projects
visiting scientist in the Geophysical Statistics Project at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO.
Education and Certifications
PhD in Statistics (1996) from North Carolina State University
BS in Fisheries and Wildlife (1990) from Michigan State University
Science and Products
Spatial capture-recapture
Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populations
Integrating resource selection information with spatial capture--recapture
Presence-only modeling using MAXENT: when can we trust the inferences?
Spatial capture-recapture models for jointly estimating population density and landscape connectivity
Explaining local-scale species distributions: relative contributions of spatial autocorrelation and landscape heterogeneity for an avian assemblage
Modeling trends from North American Breeding Bird Survey data: a spatially explicit approach
Large-scale monitoring of shorebird populations using count data and N-mixture models: Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani) surveys by land and sea
Hierarchical distance-sampling models to estimate population size and habitat-specific abundance of an island endemic
Estimating abundance of mountain lions from unstructured spatial sampling
Assessment of bias in US waterfowl harvest estimates
Likelihood analysis of species occurrence probability from presence-only data for modelling species distributions
Science and Products
- Science
- Data
- Multimedia
- Publications
Filter Total Items: 198
Spatial capture-recapture
Spatial Capture-Recapture provides a revolutionary extension of traditional capture-recapture methods for studying animal populations using data from live trapping, camera trapping, DNA sampling, acoustic sampling, and related field methods. This book is a conceptual and methodological synthesis of spatial capture-recapture modeling. As a comprehensive how-to manual, this reference contains detaiAuthorsJ. Andrew Royle, Richard B. Chandler, Rahel Sollmann, Beth GardnerSpatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populations
Recently developed spatial capture–recapture (SCR) models represent a major advance over traditional capture–recapture (CR) models because they yield explicit estimates of animal density instead of population size within an unknown area. Furthermore, unlike nonspatial CR methods, SCR models account for heterogeneity in capture probability arising from the juxtaposition of animal activity centers aAuthorsRichard B. Chandler, J. Andrew RoyleIntegrating resource selection information with spatial capture--recapture
1. Understanding space usage and resource selection is a primary focus of many studies of animal populations. Usually, such studies are based on location data obtained from telemetry, and resource selection functions (RSFs) are used for inference. Another important focus of wildlife research is estimation and modeling population size and density. Recently developed spatial capture–recapture (SCR)AuthorsJ. Andrew Royle, Richard B. Chandler, Catherine C. Sun, Angela K. FullerPresence-only modeling using MAXENT: when can we trust the inferences?
1. Recently, interest in species distribution modelling has increased following the development of new methods for the analysis of presence-only data and the deployment of these methods in user-friendly and powerful computer programs. However, reliable inference from these powerful tools requires that several assumptions be met, including the assumptions that observed presences are the consequenceAuthorsCharles B. Yackulic, Richard Chandler, Elise F. Zipkin, J. Andrew Royle, James D. Nichols, Evan H. Campbell Grant, Sophie VeranSpatial capture-recapture models for jointly estimating population density and landscape connectivity
Population size and landscape connectivity are key determinants of population viability, yet no methods exist for simultaneously estimating density and connectivity parameters. Recently developed spatial capture–recapture (SCR) models provide a framework for estimating density of animal populations but thus far have not been used to study connectivity. Rather, all applications of SCR models have uAuthorsJ. Andrew Royle, Richard B. Chandler, Kimberly D. Gazenski, Tabitha A. GravesExplaining local-scale species distributions: relative contributions of spatial autocorrelation and landscape heterogeneity for an avian assemblage
Understanding interactions between mobile species distributions and landcover characteristics remains an outstanding challenge in ecology. Multiple factors could explain species distributions including endogenous evolutionary traits leading to conspecific clustering and endogenous habitat features that support life history requirements. Birds are a useful taxon for examining hypotheses about the rAuthorsBrady J. Mattsson, Elise F. Zipkin, Beth Gardner, Peter J. Blank, John R. Sauer, J. Andrew RoyleModeling trends from North American Breeding Bird Survey data: a spatially explicit approach
Population trends, defined as interval-specific proportional changes in population size, are often used to help identify species of conservation interest. Efficient modeling of such trends depends on the consideration of the correlation of population changes with key spatial and environmental covariates. This can provide insights into causal mechanisms and allow spatially explicit summaries at scaAuthorsFlorent Bled, John R. Sauer, Keith L. Pardieck, Paul Doherty, J. Andy RoyleLarge-scale monitoring of shorebird populations using count data and N-mixture models: Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani) surveys by land and sea
Large-scale monitoring of bird populations is often based on count data collected across spatial scales that may include multiple physiographic regions and habitat types. Monitoring at large spatial scales may require multiple survey platforms (e.g., from boats and land when monitoring coastal species) and multiple survey methods. It becomes especially important to explicitly account for detectionAuthorsJames E. Lyons, Royle J. Andrew, Susan M. Thomas, Elise Elliott-Smith, Joseph R. Evenson, Elizabeth G. Kelly, Ruth L. Milner, David R. Nysewander, Brad A. AndresHierarchical distance-sampling models to estimate population size and habitat-specific abundance of an island endemic
Population size and habitat-specific abundance estimates are essential for conservation management. A major impediment to obtaining such estimates is that few statistical models are able to simultaneously account for both spatial variation in abundance and heterogeneity in detection probability, and still be amenable to large-scale applications. The hierarchical distance-sampling model of J. A. RoAuthorsScott T. Sillett, Richard B. Chandler, J. Andrew Royle, Marc Kéry, Scott A. MorrisonEstimating abundance of mountain lions from unstructured spatial sampling
Mountain lions (Puma concolor) are often difficult to monitor because of their low capture probabilities, extensive movements, and large territories. Methods for estimating the abundance of this species are needed to assess population status, determine harvest levels, evaluate the impacts of management actions on populations, and derive conservation and management strategies. Traditional mark–recaAuthorsRobin E. Russell, J. Andrew Royle, Richard Desimone, Michael K. Schwartz, Victoria L. Edwards, Kristy P. Pilgrim, Kevin S. MckelveyAssessment of bias in US waterfowl harvest estimates
Context. North American waterfowl managers have long suspected that waterfowl harvest estimates derived from national harvest surveys in the USA are biased high. Survey bias can be evaluated by comparing survey results with like estimates from independent sources. Aims. We used band-recovery data to assess the magnitude of apparent bias in duck and goose harvest estimates, using mallards (Anas plaAuthorsPaul I. Padding, J. Andrew RoyleLikelihood analysis of species occurrence probability from presence-only data for modelling species distributions
1. Understanding the factors affecting species occurrence is a pre-eminent focus of applied ecological research. However, direct information about species occurrence is lacking for many species. Instead, researchers sometimes have to rely on so-called presence-only data (i.e. when no direct information about absences is available), which often results from opportunistic, unstructured sampling. MAXAuthorsJ. Andrew Royle, Richard B. Chandler, Charles Yackulic, James D. Nichols - Software
- News