Prevalence, Distribution and Timing of Beak Deformities in Birds

Return to Wildlife, Fish, and Habitats >> Terrestrial Wildlife and Habitats or Wildlife Disease and Genetics >> Beak Deformities >> Background of Beak Deformity Research

Deformed beak Black-capped Chickadee next to peanut butter on a feeder

(Credit: Lee Tibbitts, USGS, Alaska Science Center. Public domain.)

• Beak Deformity and Banded Bird Observation Report
• Beak Deformity Home
• Background
•    Species Affected
•    Physical Description
•    Prevalence, Distribution and Timing
•    Effects on Birds
• Possible Causes
• Photo Gallery - see the Multimedia tab
• Publications - see the Publications tab
• Links
• Literature Cited

Since the 1990's, prevalence of avian keratin disorder (AKD) has clearly increased in Alaska and now affects an estimated 6.5% (±0.5%) of adult Black-capped Chickadees and 16.9% (±5.3%) of adult Northwestern Crows.

Typically, abnormal beaks are relatively rare among adult birds, and background levels are less than 0.5% in normal populations. The prevalence we measured in chickadees was four times higher than the maximum rate previously documented for any passerine (Pomerory 1962). For crows, this estimate was more than 15 times higher.

Based on reports from the late 1990s, two epicenters of AKD among Black-capped Chickadees were first identified: one in the Mat-Su Valley and one in Bristol Bay.  Beak deformities initially appeared to be clustered in south-central Alaska, where most chickadees with beak deformities have been observed.  However, relatively large numbers of chickadees and other species have recently been observed with deformities in the Fairbanks area of central Alaska.  We have also documented chickadees with beak deformities at remote locations in south-central Alaska.

Beak deformities among other species, including crows, appear to be increasing in Alaska and throughout the Pacific Northwest. In addition, recent reports from other parts of North America and Europe, particularly the United Kingdom, suggest that this problem may affect a large geographic area.

Developmentally, birds appear to develop beak deformities as adults, rather than as embryos or nestlings, suggesting that they are not congenital in nature.  Very few young birds had obvious deformities, as compared to high rates in adults.  Most deformities were very subtle in onset, however, with slight overgrowth or asymmetry of the beak. Based on results from our winter banding study, there seems to be a higher probability of deformities developing during late winter than during other parts of the year.