Jim Smith working on cabling inside of Lucchetti dam in Puerto Rico, assisting the Puerto Rico Strong Motion Program with Hurricane Maria recovery efforts.
Images
Earthquake Hazards Program images.
Jim Smith working on cabling inside of Lucchetti dam in Puerto Rico, assisting the Puerto Rico Strong Motion Program with Hurricane Maria recovery efforts.
Scott Lydeen at Strawberry Peak Seismic Station Tower
Scott Lydeen at Strawberry Peak Seismic Station TowerUSGS technicial Scott Lydeen climbing the tower at the Strawberry Peak seismic station tower, part of the Southern California Seismic Network.
Scott Lydeen at Strawberry Peak Seismic Station Tower
Scott Lydeen at Strawberry Peak Seismic Station TowerUSGS technicial Scott Lydeen climbing the tower at the Strawberry Peak seismic station tower, part of the Southern California Seismic Network.
Scott Lydeen on Strawberry Peak Seismic Station Tower
Scott Lydeen on Strawberry Peak Seismic Station TowerUSGS technicial Scott Lydeen climbing the tower at the Strawberry Peak seismic station tower, part of the Southern California Seismic Network.
Scott Lydeen on Strawberry Peak Seismic Station Tower
Scott Lydeen on Strawberry Peak Seismic Station TowerUSGS technicial Scott Lydeen climbing the tower at the Strawberry Peak seismic station tower, part of the Southern California Seismic Network.
2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence: July 4, 2019–July 16, 2019
2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence: July 4, 2019–July 16, 20193,557 earthquakes recorded since July 4, 2019 above Magnitude 2
M6.4 12km W of Searles Valley, CA
2019-07-04 17:33:49 (UTC)
51,000+ responses via Did You Feel It?
M7.1 18km W of Searles Valley, CA
2019-07-06 03:19:53 (UTC)
42,000+ responses via Did You Feel It?
2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence: July 4, 2019–July 16, 2019
2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence: July 4, 2019–July 16, 20193,557 earthquakes recorded since July 4, 2019 above Magnitude 2
M6.4 12km W of Searles Valley, CA
2019-07-04 17:33:49 (UTC)
51,000+ responses via Did You Feel It?
M7.1 18km W of Searles Valley, CA
2019-07-06 03:19:53 (UTC)
42,000+ responses via Did You Feel It?
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019USGS scientists Beth Haddon (left) and Jaime Delano (right) measuring an offset road at the site of the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence rupture. Photo credit: Chris DuRoss, USGS
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019USGS scientists Beth Haddon (left) and Jaime Delano (right) measuring an offset road at the site of the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence rupture. Photo credit: Chris DuRoss, USGS
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019USGS Geophysicists Elizabeth Cochran and Nick VanDerElst install a seismometer on the base Photo credit: Ben Brooks, USGS
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019USGS Geophysicists Elizabeth Cochran and Nick VanDerElst install a seismometer on the base Photo credit: Ben Brooks, USGS
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019USGS scientist Jessie Thompson Jobe measures fault offset at the site of the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence rupture. Photo credit: Chris DuRoss, USGS
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019USGS scientist Jessie Thompson Jobe measures fault offset at the site of the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence rupture. Photo credit: Chris DuRoss, USGS
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019USGS scientist Jaime Delano, observes a sand blow caused by liquefaction during the M7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake. Photo credit: Chris DuRoss
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019USGS scientist Jaime Delano, observes a sand blow caused by liquefaction during the M7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake. Photo credit: Chris DuRoss
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019Kate Scharer examining striations along fault scarp while completing GPS survey of fault rupture. Here the fault has about 2.6 m of horizontal displacement and 0.5 m of vertical. The rake of the striations is 47 degrees. Photo credit: Jamie Delano, USGS
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019Kate Scharer examining striations along fault scarp while completing GPS survey of fault rupture. Here the fault has about 2.6 m of horizontal displacement and 0.5 m of vertical. The rake of the striations is 47 degrees. Photo credit: Jamie Delano, USGS
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019USGS Pasadena Earthquake Response Coordinator surveys displaced rocks near the southern end of the surface rupture of the 5 July 2019 M7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake. USGS photograph. Photo credit: Sue Hough, USGS
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019USGS Pasadena Earthquake Response Coordinator surveys displaced rocks near the southern end of the surface rupture of the 5 July 2019 M7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake. USGS photograph. Photo credit: Sue Hough, USGS
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019Geologists with USGS, the California Geological Survey (CGS) and Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake (NAWS) worked together in response to the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence in California that occurred July 4-6, 2019. The earthquakes were large enough that the fault rupture reached the earth’s surface.
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019Geologists with USGS, the California Geological Survey (CGS) and Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake (NAWS) worked together in response to the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence in California that occurred July 4-6, 2019. The earthquakes were large enough that the fault rupture reached the earth’s surface.
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019USGS scientist Jessie Thompson Jobe collects and records information on earthquake surface ruptures observed along a roadway following the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. Photo credit: Ryan Gold (USGS)
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019USGS scientist Jessie Thompson Jobe collects and records information on earthquake surface ruptures observed along a roadway following the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. Photo credit: Ryan Gold (USGS)
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019USGS Pasadena Earthquake Response Coordinator Sue Hough, surveys displaced rocks near the southern end of the surface rupture of the 5 July 2019 M7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake. Photo credit: Sue Hough, USGS
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019USGS Pasadena Earthquake Response Coordinator Sue Hough, surveys displaced rocks near the southern end of the surface rupture of the 5 July 2019 M7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake. Photo credit: Sue Hough, USGS
USGS provides briefing to Navy about Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence
USGS provides briefing to Navy about Ridgecrest Earthquake SequenceKate Scharer (USGS) provides CO CAPT Paul Dale (Navy) with the field mapping team’s initial product, showing the surface fault rupture at NAWSCL as well as the temporarily deployed seismic and GPS sensors that were rapidly deployed. Contributions of field data from within the base were from CGS & USGS, and from outside the base were from Univ.
USGS provides briefing to Navy about Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence
USGS provides briefing to Navy about Ridgecrest Earthquake SequenceKate Scharer (USGS) provides CO CAPT Paul Dale (Navy) with the field mapping team’s initial product, showing the surface fault rupture at NAWSCL as well as the temporarily deployed seismic and GPS sensors that were rapidly deployed. Contributions of field data from within the base were from CGS & USGS, and from outside the base were from Univ.
USGS provides briefing to Navy about Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence
USGS provides briefing to Navy about Ridgecrest Earthquake SequenceKate Scharer (USGS) provides CO CAPT Paul Dale (Navy) with the field mapping team’s initial product, showing the surface fault rupture at NAWSCL as well as the temporarily deployed seismic and GPS sensors that were rapidly deployed. Contributions of field data from within the base were from CGS & USGS, and from outside the base were from Univ.
USGS provides briefing to Navy about Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence
USGS provides briefing to Navy about Ridgecrest Earthquake SequenceKate Scharer (USGS) provides CO CAPT Paul Dale (Navy) with the field mapping team’s initial product, showing the surface fault rupture at NAWSCL as well as the temporarily deployed seismic and GPS sensors that were rapidly deployed. Contributions of field data from within the base were from CGS & USGS, and from outside the base were from Univ.
Two portable sensors: a strong motion sensor (to record strong shaking that can be felt) and a broadband sensor (to record weak motion for detecting small earthquakes) buried into the ground to detect earthquakes. These stations can be quickly deployed and send real-time data back to the USGS via cellular telemetry immediately after they are installed.
Two portable sensors: a strong motion sensor (to record strong shaking that can be felt) and a broadband sensor (to record weak motion for detecting small earthquakes) buried into the ground to detect earthquakes. These stations can be quickly deployed and send real-time data back to the USGS via cellular telemetry immediately after they are installed.
Helicopter Overflight Viewing Access Road Fault Offset
Helicopter Overflight Viewing Access Road Fault OffsetCalifornia Geological Survey and USGS geologists and geophysicists with National Guard and Navy personnel view road damage from 3 to 5 feet of right-lateral motion near the expected maximum slip locality along the primary tectonic rupture associated with the M 7.1 event.
Helicopter Overflight Viewing Access Road Fault Offset
Helicopter Overflight Viewing Access Road Fault OffsetCalifornia Geological Survey and USGS geologists and geophysicists with National Guard and Navy personnel view road damage from 3 to 5 feet of right-lateral motion near the expected maximum slip locality along the primary tectonic rupture associated with the M 7.1 event.
Scientists from USGS & California Geological Survey viewing vertical fault offset of ~12 +/- 3 foot high fault scarp near the expected maximum slip locality along the primary tectonic rupture associated with the M 7.1 event.
Scientists from USGS & California Geological Survey viewing vertical fault offset of ~12 +/- 3 foot high fault scarp near the expected maximum slip locality along the primary tectonic rupture associated with the M 7.1 event.
Northern end of rupture resulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley quake
Northern end of rupture resulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley quakeFault rupture crosses dirt road, with California Geologial Survey vehicles for scale. Displacement at this location is primarily normal (vertical). Photograph taken near the northern end of the rupture resulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake.
Northern end of rupture resulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley quake
Northern end of rupture resulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley quakeFault rupture crosses dirt road, with California Geologial Survey vehicles for scale. Displacement at this location is primarily normal (vertical). Photograph taken near the northern end of the rupture resulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake.
Surface faulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake
Surface faulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquakeOblique photograph showing surface faulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake. The dirt track (center) is right-laterally offset approximately 2.5 m (~8 ft).
Surface faulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake
Surface faulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquakeOblique photograph showing surface faulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake. The dirt track (center) is right-laterally offset approximately 2.5 m (~8 ft).
Scanning surface rupture from Searles Valley earthquake
Scanning surface rupture from Searles Valley earthquake
USGS Earthquake Science Center Mobile Laser Scanning truck operated by Ben Brooks and Todd Ericksen scanning the surface rupture near the zone of maximum surface displacement of the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake.
Scanning surface rupture from Searles Valley earthquake
Scanning surface rupture from Searles Valley earthquake
USGS Earthquake Science Center Mobile Laser Scanning truck operated by Ben Brooks and Todd Ericksen scanning the surface rupture near the zone of maximum surface displacement of the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake.