Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Images

Earthquake Hazards Program images.

Filter Total Items: 573
A woman and two men inspect and measure a large crack in the earth's surface
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019

Geologists with USGS, the California Geological Survey (CGS) and Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake (NAWS) worked together in response to the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence in California that occurred July 4-6, 2019. The earthquakes were large enough that the fault rupture reached the earth’s surface.

Geologists with USGS, the California Geological Survey (CGS) and Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake (NAWS) worked together in response to the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence in California that occurred July 4-6, 2019. The earthquakes were large enough that the fault rupture reached the earth’s surface.

two women making measurements of a rupture in the ground surface
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019

USGS scientists Beth Haddon (left) and Jaime Delano (right) measuring an offset road at the site of the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence rupture. Photo credit: Chris DuRoss, USGS

A woman makes notes while overlooking earth ruptures in ground on a dirt road
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019

USGS scientist Jessie Thompson Jobe collects and records information on earthquake surface ruptures observed along a roadway following the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. Photo credit: Ryan Gold (USGS)

USGS scientist Jessie Thompson Jobe collects and records information on earthquake surface ruptures observed along a roadway following the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. Photo credit: Ryan Gold (USGS)

A woman stands along a rupture in the ground surface
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019

USGS Pasadena Earthquake Response Coordinator surveys displaced rocks near the southern end of the surface rupture of the 5 July 2019 M7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake.  USGS photograph. Photo credit: Sue Hough, USGS

USGS Pasadena Earthquake Response Coordinator surveys displaced rocks near the southern end of the surface rupture of the 5 July 2019 M7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake.  USGS photograph. Photo credit: Sue Hough, USGS

a woman with a GPS antenna kneels along an exposed rock face that is being measured
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019

Kate Scharer examining striations along fault scarp while completing GPS survey of fault rupture.  Here the fault has about 2.6 m of horizontal displacement and 0.5 m of vertical.  The rake of the striations is 47 degrees.  Photo credit: Jamie Delano, USGS

Kate Scharer examining striations along fault scarp while completing GPS survey of fault rupture.  Here the fault has about 2.6 m of horizontal displacement and 0.5 m of vertical.  The rake of the striations is 47 degrees.  Photo credit: Jamie Delano, USGS

a woman crouches in the field near newly made sand deposits
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019

USGS scientist Jaime Delano, observes a sand blow caused by liquefaction during the M7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake. Photo credit: Chris DuRoss

two people working with instruments in an arid area
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019

USGS Geophysicists Elizabeth Cochran and Nick VanDerElst install a seismometer on the base Photo credit: Ben Brooks, USGS

A woman holds a tape measure across a rupture in the ground
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019

USGS scientist Jessie Thompson Jobe measures fault offset at the site of the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence rupture. Photo credit: Chris DuRoss, USGS

A woman walks along a rupture in the ground
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019
Women in Science - Responding to Ridgecrest, CA earthquake July 2019

USGS Pasadena Earthquake Response Coordinator Sue Hough, surveys displaced rocks near the southern end of the surface rupture of the 5 July 2019 M7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake.  Photo credit: Sue Hough, USGS

USGS Pasadena Earthquake Response Coordinator Sue Hough, surveys displaced rocks near the southern end of the surface rupture of the 5 July 2019 M7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake.  Photo credit: Sue Hough, USGS

Please click on image for full description and image details.
2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence: July 4, 2019–July 16, 2019
2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence: July 4, 2019–July 16, 2019
2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence: July 4, 2019–July 16, 2019

3,557 earthquakes recorded since July 4, 2019 above Magnitude 2

M6.4 12km W of Searles Valley, CA
2019-07-04 17:33:49 (UTC)
51,000+ responses via Did You Feel It?

M7.1 18km W of Searles Valley, CA
2019-07-06 03:19:53 (UTC)
42,000+ responses via Did You Feel It?

3,557 earthquakes recorded since July 4, 2019 above Magnitude 2

M6.4 12km W of Searles Valley, CA
2019-07-04 17:33:49 (UTC)
51,000+ responses via Did You Feel It?

M7.1 18km W of Searles Valley, CA
2019-07-06 03:19:53 (UTC)
42,000+ responses via Did You Feel It?

briefing navy
USGS provides briefing to Navy about Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence
USGS provides briefing to Navy about Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence
USGS provides briefing to Navy about Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence

Kate Scharer (USGS) provides CO CAPT Paul Dale (Navy) with the field mapping team’s initial product, showing the surface fault rupture at NAWSCL as well as the temporarily deployed seismic and GPS sensors that were rapidly deployed. Contributions of field data from within the base were from CGS & USGS, and from outside the base were from Univ.

Kate Scharer (USGS) provides CO CAPT Paul Dale (Navy) with the field mapping team’s initial product, showing the surface fault rupture at NAWSCL as well as the temporarily deployed seismic and GPS sensors that were rapidly deployed. Contributions of field data from within the base were from CGS & USGS, and from outside the base were from Univ.

briefing navy
USGS provides briefing to Navy about Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence
USGS provides briefing to Navy about Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence
USGS provides briefing to Navy about Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence

Kate Scharer (USGS) provides CO CAPT Paul Dale (Navy) with the field mapping team’s initial product, showing the surface fault rupture at NAWSCL as well as the temporarily deployed seismic and GPS sensors that were rapidly deployed. Contributions of field data from within the base were from CGS & USGS, and from outside the base were from Univ.

Kate Scharer (USGS) provides CO CAPT Paul Dale (Navy) with the field mapping team’s initial product, showing the surface fault rupture at NAWSCL as well as the temporarily deployed seismic and GPS sensors that were rapidly deployed. Contributions of field data from within the base were from CGS & USGS, and from outside the base were from Univ.

Portable Seismic Station
Portable Seismic Station
Portable Seismic Station
Portable Seismic Station

Two portable sensors: a strong motion sensor (to record strong shaking that can be felt) and a broadband sensor (to record weak motion for detecting small earthquakes) buried into the ground to detect earthquakes. These stations can be quickly deployed and send real-time data back to the USGS via cellular telemetry immediately after they are installed. 

Two portable sensors: a strong motion sensor (to record strong shaking that can be felt) and a broadband sensor (to record weak motion for detecting small earthquakes) buried into the ground to detect earthquakes. These stations can be quickly deployed and send real-time data back to the USGS via cellular telemetry immediately after they are installed. 

lidar truck
Scanning surface rupture from Searles Valley earthquake
Scanning surface rupture from Searles Valley earthquake
Scanning surface rupture from Searles Valley earthquake

 

USGS Earthquake Science Center Mobile Laser Scanning truck operated by Ben Brooks and Todd Ericksen scanning the surface rupture near the zone of maximum surface displacement of the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake.

 

USGS Earthquake Science Center Mobile Laser Scanning truck operated by Ben Brooks and Todd Ericksen scanning the surface rupture near the zone of maximum surface displacement of the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake.

fault scarp
Inspecting the Vertical Offset Fault Scarp
Inspecting the Vertical Offset Fault Scarp
Inspecting the Vertical Offset Fault Scarp

Scientists from USGS & California Geological Survey viewing vertical fault offset of ~12 +/- 3 foot high fault scarp near the expected maximum slip locality along the primary tectonic rupture associated with the M 7.1 event.

Scientists from USGS & California Geological Survey viewing vertical fault offset of ~12 +/- 3 foot high fault scarp near the expected maximum slip locality along the primary tectonic rupture associated with the M 7.1 event.

surface displacement
Measure surface displacement from Searles Valley quake #1
Measure surface displacement from Searles Valley quake #1
Measure surface displacement from Searles Valley quake #1

USGS Research Geologists Christopher DuRoss and Jessica Thompson Jobe examine rupture resulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake.

access road offset
Helicopter Overflight Viewing Access Road Fault Offset
Helicopter Overflight Viewing Access Road Fault Offset
Helicopter Overflight Viewing Access Road Fault Offset

California Geological Survey and USGS geologists and geophysicists with National Guard and Navy personnel view road damage from 3 to 5 feet of right-lateral motion near the expected maximum slip locality along the primary tectonic rupture associated with the M 7.1 event.

California Geological Survey and USGS geologists and geophysicists with National Guard and Navy personnel view road damage from 3 to 5 feet of right-lateral motion near the expected maximum slip locality along the primary tectonic rupture associated with the M 7.1 event.

rupture
Northern end of rupture resulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley quake
Northern end of rupture resulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley quake
Northern end of rupture resulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley quake

Fault rupture crosses dirt road, with California Geologial Survey vehicles for scale. Displacement at this location is primarily normal (vertical). Photograph taken near the northern end of the rupture resulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake.

Fault rupture crosses dirt road, with California Geologial Survey vehicles for scale. Displacement at this location is primarily normal (vertical). Photograph taken near the northern end of the rupture resulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake.

Surface faulting
Surface faulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake
Surface faulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake
Surface faulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake

Oblique photograph showing surface faulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake. The dirt track (center) is right-laterally offset approximately 2.5 m (~8 ft).

Measure surface displacement from Searles Valley quake #2
Measure surface displacement from Searles Valley quake #2
Measure surface displacement from Searles Valley quake #2

USGS Research Geologists Christopher DuRoss measures surface displacement resulting from the M7.1 Searles Valley earthquake.

Was this page helpful?