Collaborative joint agency study provides nationally consistent and rigorously quality-assured datasets on a wide range of chemical and microbial contaminants present in source and treated public drinking water supplies. Tap water was not analyzed in this study.
Public drinking water in the United States is of high quality. Disinfection alone has greatly reduced acute health risks of drinking public water supplies. Protection of the Nation's drinking water resources is a priority for and the responsibility of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) under the Safe Drinking Water Act in conjunction with State and Tribal agencies and water utilities. Water purveyors consistently monitor more than 100 chemical and microbial contaminants as part of compliance requirements under the Safe Drinking Water Act. The public has access to compliance monitoring results and water purveyors summarize this information annually in Consumer Confidence Reports issued to all customers. Beyond compliance monitoring, there currently are other sources of data on regulated and unregulated contaminants in untreated and treated drinking water as part of the USEPA's Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule and from the independent efforts of public water purveyors themselves, academia, and other research and assessment programs.
Tens of thousands of organic chemicals such as pharmaceuticals, fragrances, plastic components, surfactants, fire retardants, hormones, and pesticides, as well as inorganic chemicals such as metals, are used in large quantities for a range of purposes by modern society. Many of these chemicals have been detected in a variety of environmental waters that serve as source waters for drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) and in some cases have been detected in public drinking water.
The USEPA and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) joined efforts to broaden the scope of existing public drinking water information by providing a nationally consistent and rigorously quality-assured dataset on a wide range of chemical and microbial contaminants present in source and treated waters. The two agencies analyzed water samples for 233 chemical and 14 microbial contaminants in source (untreated, raw) and treated drinking waters from 29 DWTPs. Tap water was not sampled as part of this research. Based on previous studies, the concentrations measured in this study were thought to be close to laboratory detection limit capabilities. Therefore, a rigorous quality-assurance plan was utilized to include quality-control samples for more than 70 percent of all samples collected.
The results of this collaborative study were published in eight papers in the journal Science of the Total Environment. The highlights are summarized in this article and the links to the full articles are listed below. Similar to previous studies done with a more limited list of contaminants, scientists determined that samples from DWTPs serving a range of population sizes that use a variety of water sources and employ common treatment processes contain a wide range of regulated and unregulated chemical and microbial contaminants in source as well as treated water.
Not surprisingly, many of the targeted organic chemical contaminants tended to be infrequently detected in spite of low detection capabilities, whereas a smaller subset of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl chemicals and inorganic constituents were more frequently detected even in finished drinking water samples. Inorganic contaminants are almost always detected in water because most are naturally occurring (often referred to as "geogenic"), whereas organic chemicals analyzed are largely associated with human-made sources (often referred to as "anthropogenic"). Fewer chemical and microbial contaminants were detected in treated drinking water samples (121) than source-water samples (148). Pathogenic microorganisms were widespread in source waters but treatment was generally effective in reducing these to below detection limits. The one exception was mycobacteria (previously documented to grow within DWTPs and known to be resistant to drinking water treatment), which were commonly detected in treated water when a combination of live and dead cells were measured.
These results indicate that although most of the chemical contaminants were below detection after treatment, many were present in water distributed for potable use. The concentrations of chemical contaminants were typically in the parts per trillion range. Determinations of the potential health implications of drinking water at those concentrations was beyond the scope of this effort however comparisons to existing health benchmarks revealed no immediate public health concerns. The unique datasets developed by this research will be used for a range of potential activities including USEPA's drinking water standard determination process and other research on drinking water exposures and health being explored collaboratively by USGS and public-health experts.
The USGS Environmental Health Program (Toxic Substances Hydrology and Contaminant Biology) of the Ecosystems Mission Area and the USEPA Office of Research and Development funded this study through Interagency Agreement DW14922330.
Related research is listed below.
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Residential Tap Water: Source-to-Tap Science for Underserved Communities
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) detected in Source Waters and Treated Public Water Supplies
Sources of Contaminants to Congaree National Park—USGS and National Park Service Working Together
U.S. Geological Survey Scientists Complete First Systematic Regional Survey of Algal Toxins in Streams of the Southeastern United States
First National-Scale Reconnaissance of Neonicotinoid Insecticides in United States Streams
Assessing Environmental Chemical Mixtures in United States Streams
Personal Care Products, Pharmaceuticals, and Hormones Move from Septic Systems to Local Groundwater
Below are publications associated with this research.
Nationwide reconnaissance of contaminants of emerging concern in source and treated drinking waters of the United States
Aquatic concentrations of chemical analytes compared to ecotoxicity estimates
The importance of quality control in validating concentrationsof contaminants of emerging concern in source and treateddrinking water samples
Human health screening and public health significance of contaminants of emerging concern detected in public water supplies
Comparison of in vitro estrogenic activity and estrogen concentrations insource and treated waters from 25 U.S. drinking water treatment plants
Nationwide reconnaissance of contaminants of emerging concern in source and treated drinking waters of the United States: Pharmaceuticals
Microbial pathogens in source and treated waters from drinking water treatment plants in the United States and implications for human health
- Overview
Collaborative joint agency study provides nationally consistent and rigorously quality-assured datasets on a wide range of chemical and microbial contaminants present in source and treated public drinking water supplies. Tap water was not analyzed in this study.
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) scientists collected samples of source (untreated, raw) and treated drinking waters from 29 drinking-water treatment plant across the country. (Credit: Barb Sturner, Federal Emergency Management Agency. Public domain.) Public drinking water in the United States is of high quality. Disinfection alone has greatly reduced acute health risks of drinking public water supplies. Protection of the Nation's drinking water resources is a priority for and the responsibility of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) under the Safe Drinking Water Act in conjunction with State and Tribal agencies and water utilities. Water purveyors consistently monitor more than 100 chemical and microbial contaminants as part of compliance requirements under the Safe Drinking Water Act. The public has access to compliance monitoring results and water purveyors summarize this information annually in Consumer Confidence Reports issued to all customers. Beyond compliance monitoring, there currently are other sources of data on regulated and unregulated contaminants in untreated and treated drinking water as part of the USEPA's Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule and from the independent efforts of public water purveyors themselves, academia, and other research and assessment programs.
Tens of thousands of organic chemicals such as pharmaceuticals, fragrances, plastic components, surfactants, fire retardants, hormones, and pesticides, as well as inorganic chemicals such as metals, are used in large quantities for a range of purposes by modern society. Many of these chemicals have been detected in a variety of environmental waters that serve as source waters for drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) and in some cases have been detected in public drinking water.
The USEPA and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) joined efforts to broaden the scope of existing public drinking water information by providing a nationally consistent and rigorously quality-assured dataset on a wide range of chemical and microbial contaminants present in source and treated waters. The two agencies analyzed water samples for 233 chemical and 14 microbial contaminants in source (untreated, raw) and treated drinking waters from 29 DWTPs. Tap water was not sampled as part of this research. Based on previous studies, the concentrations measured in this study were thought to be close to laboratory detection limit capabilities. Therefore, a rigorous quality-assurance plan was utilized to include quality-control samples for more than 70 percent of all samples collected.
Typical spigot near the wellhead inside of a drinking-water treatment plant that the scientists used to collect raw water samples prior to any treatment. (Credit: Laura Hubbard, USGS. Public domain.) The results of this collaborative study were published in eight papers in the journal Science of the Total Environment. The highlights are summarized in this article and the links to the full articles are listed below. Similar to previous studies done with a more limited list of contaminants, scientists determined that samples from DWTPs serving a range of population sizes that use a variety of water sources and employ common treatment processes contain a wide range of regulated and unregulated chemical and microbial contaminants in source as well as treated water.
This study included drinking-water treatment plants that used surface-water and groundwater sources. This photo shows a typical wellhead inside of a drinking-water plant. (Credit: Kymm Barnes, USGS. Public domain.) Not surprisingly, many of the targeted organic chemical contaminants tended to be infrequently detected in spite of low detection capabilities, whereas a smaller subset of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl chemicals and inorganic constituents were more frequently detected even in finished drinking water samples. Inorganic contaminants are almost always detected in water because most are naturally occurring (often referred to as "geogenic"), whereas organic chemicals analyzed are largely associated with human-made sources (often referred to as "anthropogenic"). Fewer chemical and microbial contaminants were detected in treated drinking water samples (121) than source-water samples (148). Pathogenic microorganisms were widespread in source waters but treatment was generally effective in reducing these to below detection limits. The one exception was mycobacteria (previously documented to grow within DWTPs and known to be resistant to drinking water treatment), which were commonly detected in treated water when a combination of live and dead cells were measured.
These results indicate that although most of the chemical contaminants were below detection after treatment, many were present in water distributed for potable use. The concentrations of chemical contaminants were typically in the parts per trillion range. Determinations of the potential health implications of drinking water at those concentrations was beyond the scope of this effort however comparisons to existing health benchmarks revealed no immediate public health concerns. The unique datasets developed by this research will be used for a range of potential activities including USEPA's drinking water standard determination process and other research on drinking water exposures and health being explored collaboratively by USGS and public-health experts.
The USGS Environmental Health Program (Toxic Substances Hydrology and Contaminant Biology) of the Ecosystems Mission Area and the USEPA Office of Research and Development funded this study through Interagency Agreement DW14922330.
- Science
Related research is listed below.
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Residential Tap Water: Source-to-Tap Science for Underserved Communities
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) were detected at low levels in treated drinking water samples from residential taps in the Greater Chicago Area. This study is part of a larger approach to provide an understanding of contaminant mixtures in residential tap water across the Nation including underserved communities in rural, urban, and tribal areas.Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) detected in Source Waters and Treated Public Water Supplies
This study, which measured 17 per- and polyfuoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in source and treated public water supplies from 25 drinking water facilities as part of a broader study of contaminants in drinking water across the United States, reports that PFASs were detected in all source water and public water supply samples collected. One sample exceeded the current U.S. Environmental Protection...Sources of Contaminants to Congaree National Park—USGS and National Park Service Working Together
A National Park Service (NPS) and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) study determined the concentrations, potential for degradation, and potential for aquatic and terrestrial animal exposure to organic contaminants in water and sediment within the flood-plain/aquatic environments of Congaree National Park which is located downstream from urban and agricultural areas.U.S. Geological Survey Scientists Complete First Systematic Regional Survey of Algal Toxins in Streams of the Southeastern United States
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists detected microcystin—an algal toxin—in 39 percent of 75 streams assessed in the southeastern United States. These results will inform and become part of a larger, systematic national survey of algal toxins in small streams of the United States.First National-Scale Reconnaissance of Neonicotinoid Insecticides in United States Streams
Neonicotinoid insecticides (neonicotinoids) were present in a little more than half of the streams sampled across the United States and Puerto Rico, according to a new U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) study. This is the first national-scale study of the presence of neonicotinoids in urban and agricultural land use settings across the Nation and was completed as part of ongoing USGS investigations of...Assessing Environmental Chemical Mixtures in United States Streams
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are collaborating on a field-based study of chemical mixture composition and environmental effects in stream waters affected by a wide range of human activities and contaminant sources.Personal Care Products, Pharmaceuticals, and Hormones Move from Septic Systems to Local Groundwater
Pharmaceuticals, hormones, personal care products, and other contaminants of concern associated with everyday household activities were found in adjacent shallow groundwater near two septic system networks in New York (NY) and New England (NE). Factors influencing movement to shallow groundwater and the types of chemicals found include population served by a septic system, site conditions such as... - Publications
Below are publications associated with this research.
Nationwide reconnaissance of contaminants of emerging concern in source and treated drinking waters of the United States
When chemical or microbial contaminants are assessed for potential effect or possible regulation in ambient and drinking waters, a critical first step is determining if the contaminants occur and if they are at concentrations that may cause human or ecological health concerns. To this end, source and treated drinking water samples from 29 drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) were analyzed as paAuthorsSusan T. Glassmeyer, Edward T. Furlong, Dana W. Kolpin, Angela L. Batt, Robert Benson, J. Scott Boone, Octavia D. Conerly, Maura J. Donohue, Dawn N. King, Mitchell S. Kostich, Heath E. Mash, Stacy Pfaller, Kathleen M. Schenck, Jane Ellen Simmons, Eunice A. Varughese, Stephen J. Vesper, Eric N. Villegas, Vickie S. WilsonAquatic concentrations of chemical analytes compared to ecotoxicity estimates
We describe screening level estimates of potential aquatic toxicity posed by 227 chemical analytes that were measured in 25 ambient water samples collected as part of a joint USGS/USEPA drinking water plant study. Measured concentrations were compared to biological effect concentration (EC) estimates, including USEPA aquatic life criteria, effective plasma concentrations of pharmaceuticals, publisAuthorsMitchell S. Kostich, Robert W. Flick, Angela L. Batt, Heath E. Mash, J. Scott Boone, Edward T. Furlong, Dana W. Kolpin, Susan T. GlassmeyerThe importance of quality control in validating concentrationsof contaminants of emerging concern in source and treateddrinking water samples
A national-scale survey of 247 contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), including organic and inorganic chemical compounds, andmicrobial contaminants, was conducted in source and treated drinkingwater samples from 25 treatment plants across the United States.Multiplemethodswere used to determine these CECs, including six analytical methods tomeasure 174 pharmaceuticals, personal care products, andAuthorsAngela L. Batt, Edward T. Furlong, Heath E. Mash, Susan T. Glassmeyer, Dana W. KolpinHuman health screening and public health significance of contaminants of emerging concern detected in public water supplies
The source water and treated drinking water from twenty five drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) across the United States were sampled in 2010–2012. Samples were analyzed for 247 contaminants using 15 chemical and microbiological methods. Most of these contaminants are not regulated currently either in drinking water or in discharges to ambient water by the U. S. Environmental Protection AgencAuthorsRobert Benson, Octavia D. Conerly, William Sander, Angela L. Batt, J. Scott Boone, Edward T. Furlong, Susan T. Glassmeyer, Dana W. Kolpin, Heath MashComparison of in vitro estrogenic activity and estrogen concentrations insource and treated waters from 25 U.S. drinking water treatment plants
In vitro bioassays have been successfully used to screen for estrogenic activity in wastewater and surface water, however, few have been applied to treated drinking water. Here, extracts of source and treated water samples were assayed for estrogenic activity using T47D-KBluc cells and analyzed by liquid chromatography-Fourier transform mass spectrometry (LC-FTMS) for natural and synthetic estrogeAuthorsJustin M. Conley, Nicola Evans, Heath Mash, Laura Rosenblum, Kathleen Schenck, Susan Glassmeyer, Edward T. Furlong, Dana W. Kolpin, Vickie S. WilsonNationwide reconnaissance of contaminants of emerging concern in source and treated drinking waters of the United States: Pharmaceuticals
Mobile and persistent chemicals that are present in urban wastewater, such as pharmaceuticals, may survive on-site ormunicipal wastewater treatment and post-discharge environmental processes. These pharmaceuticals have the potential to reach surface and groundwaters, essential drinking-water sources. A joint, two-phase U.S. Geological Survey-U.S. Environmental Protection Agency study examined sourAuthorsEdward T. Furlong, Angela L. Batt, Susan T. Glassmeyer, Mary C. Noriega, Dana W. Kolpin, Heath Mash, Kathleen M. SchenckMicrobial pathogens in source and treated waters from drinking water treatment plants in the United States and implications for human health
An occurrence survey was conducted on selected pathogens in source and treated drinking water collected from 25 drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) in the United States. Water samples were analyzed for the protozoa Giardia and Cryptosporidium (EPA Method 1623); the fungi Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus terreus (quantitative PCR [qPCR]); and the bacteria Legionella pneuAuthorsDawn N. King, Maura J. Donohue, Stephen J. Vesper, Eric N. Villegas, Michael W. Ware, Megan E. Vogel, Edward Furlong, Dana W. Kolpin, Susan T. Glassmeyer, Stacy Pfaller