Publications
Filter Total Items: 2398
Landslide-channel feedbacks amplify channel widening during floods Landslide-channel feedbacks amplify channel widening during floods
Channel widening is a major hazard during floods, particularly in confined mountainous catchments. However, channel widening during floods is not well understood and not always explained by hydraulic variables alone. Floods in mountainous regions often coincide with landslides triggered by heavy rainfall, yet landslide-channel interactions during a flood event are not well known or...
Authors
Georgina L. Bennett, Diego Panici, Francis K. Rengers, Jason W. Kean, Sara L. Rathburn
Comment on “The 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake: Relic railroad offset reveals rupture” by Roger Bilham and Susan E Hough Comment on “The 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake: Relic railroad offset reveals rupture” by Roger Bilham and Susan E Hough
No abstract available.
Authors
Thomas L. Pratt, Martin C. Chapman, Qimin Wu
Invited perspectives: Integrating hydrologic information into the next generation of landslide early warning systems Invited perspectives: Integrating hydrologic information into the next generation of landslide early warning systems
Although rainfall-triggered landslides are initiated by subsurface hydro-mechanical processes related to the loading, weakening, and eventual failure of slope materials, most landslide early warning systems (LEWS) have relied solely on rainfall event information. In previous decades, several studies demonstrated the value of integrating proxies for subsurface hydrologic information to...
Authors
Benjamin B. Mirus, Thom Bogaard, Roberto Greco, Manfred Stähli
Using the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio method to estimate thickness of the Barry Arm landslide, Prince William Sound, Alaska Using the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio method to estimate thickness of the Barry Arm landslide, Prince William Sound, Alaska
Conducting detailed investigations of large landslides is difficult, especially in the subsurface, largely due to environmental factors such as steep slopes, difficult access, and numerous objective hazards. These factors have made it challenging to accurately estimate the depth to the failure surface of the Barry Arm landslide, a large (roughly 108 cubic meters), deep-seated bedrock...
Authors
Andrew L. Collins, Kate E. Allstadt, Dennis M. Staley
A partially nonergodic ground-motion model for Fourier amplitude spectra for the San Francisco Bay area, California, USA A partially nonergodic ground-motion model for Fourier amplitude spectra for the San Francisco Bay area, California, USA
We develop a partially nonergodic ground-motion model (GMM) for Fourier amplitude spectra for the San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA, using the Bayless and Abrahamson (2019) GMM as a reference ergodic GMM and developing location-dependent adjustments to the predicted median and variance. We compile regional ground-motion data from moment magnitude (𝑀w) >3 earthquakes occurring...
Authors
Morgan P. Moschetti, Eric M. Thompson, Ryan Peterson, James Andrew Smith, Brad T. Aagaard
New developments at the Center for Engineering Strong-Motion Data (CESMD) New developments at the Center for Engineering Strong-Motion Data (CESMD)
The Center for Engineering Strong-Motion Data (CESMD), an internationally utilized joint center of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the California Geological Survey (CGS), provides a single access point for earthquake strong-motion records and station metadata from the CGS California Strong-Motion Instrumentation Program (CSMIP), the USGS National Strong-Motion Project (NSMP), the...
Authors
Lijam Hagos, Hamid Haddadi, Lisa Sue Schleicher, Jamison Haase Steidl, Eric M. Thompson, Heather Crume, M. Dhar, N. Leue
Challenges in developing vertical hazard for seismic analysis of concrete dams Challenges in developing vertical hazard for seismic analysis of concrete dams
The seismic response of concrete dams depends on both the horizontal (H) and vertical (V) components of ground motion (GM), and excluding the V components when conducting response history analyses (RHAs) may underestimate the seismic fragility. Although V components of GM time series could be selected to be consistent with the hazard, hazard curves for the V component (or for short, V...
Authors
N. Simon Kwong, Sanaz Rezaeian, Andrew James Makdisi, Nico Luco
Development of USGS NSHMs: Do small changes in hazard imply small changes in risk? Development of USGS NSHMs: Do small changes in hazard imply small changes in risk?
One of the flagship products from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is the National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM). Since 1976, the NSHM has been periodically updated to reflect newly published earthquake science and provide probabilistic estimates of seismic hazard for the United States. During each update cycle, alternative models are deliberated, analyzed, and documented through logic...
Authors
N. Simon Kwong, Kishor S. Jaiswal
International data gaps at the Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data International data gaps at the Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data
The Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data (CESMD) is utilized by seismologists, engineers, and disaster management professionals in the US and has historically achieved and distributed waveforms from across the globe for significant earthquakes. The increased access to the waveforms via Web API (Application Programming Interface) offers a unique opportunity to provide the community...
Authors
Han Shao, Jeff Brody, Lisa Sue Schleicher, Kristin Marano, Jamison Haase Steidl, Eric M. Thompson, Mike Hearne, James Luke Blair
Site-specific, extended ShakeMaps for earthquake engineering applications Site-specific, extended ShakeMaps for earthquake engineering applications
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) routinely produces ShakeMaps of shaking intensity across the globe. Due to practical constraints, the number of response spectral periods was limited to three standard periods (0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 sec). We have recently developed the tools that are necessary to expand this functionality to include 22 periods (matching the current U.S. National Seismic...
Authors
Eric M. Thompson, Mike Hearne, Charles Worden, Vince Quitoriano, Annabelle Elizabeth Cunningham, David J. Wald
The 2023 U.S. 50-state National Seismic Hazard Model: Changes in 2023 compared to 2018 ground motions The 2023 U.S. 50-state National Seismic Hazard Model: Changes in 2023 compared to 2018 ground motions
We present the 2023 U.S. National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) for all 50 states that applies new smoothed seismicity, fault rupture, and ground motion models. New data and methods are introduced in the 2023 earthquake rupture forecast that include: new earthquake catalogs - excluding induced earthquakes, alternative declustering methods, spatially smoothed seismicity distributions, full...
Authors
Mark D. Petersen, Jason M. Altekruse, Oliver S. Boyd, Demi Leafar Girot, Julie A. Herrick, Kishor S. Jaiswal, N. Simon Kwong, Andrea L. Llenos, Kevin Millner, Morgan P. Moschetti, Peter M. Powers, Sanaz Rezaeian, Justin L. Rubinstein, Kenneth S. Rukstales, Allison M. Shumway
Effective site coefficients for the 2024 International Building Code (IBC) Effective site coefficients for the 2024 International Building Code (IBC)
The U.S. National Seismic Hazard Models (NSHMs), developed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), have long been the scientific foundation of seismic design guidelines and have been used to compute design ground motions for construction of new buildings and retrofit of existing buildings in the United States and its territories. The 2018 NSHM is adopted by the 2024 International Building...
Authors
Sanaz Rezaeian, Nico Luco, Andrew James Makdisi, Henry Mason