Dianna M Hogan, Ph.D.
Dianna Hogan is the Deputy Regional Director for Science for the Southeast Region. She has been with the USGS since 2000 and previously served as a Student Trainee (Biology), a Research Physical Scientist, a Supervisory Physical Scientist, and as the Acting Center Director for the Eastern Geographic Science Center (EGSC), the St Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center (SPCMSC), the South Atla
Education and Certifications
Ph.D. in Environmental Science and Policy; George Mason University
M.S. in Biology; George Mason University
B.S. in Biochemistry; The Wichita State University
Science and Products
Ephemeral stream network extraction from lidar-derived elevation and topographic attributes in urban and forested landscapes
Lessons learned from 20 y of monitoring suburban development with distributed stormwater management in Clarksburg, Maryland, USA
The presence of denitrifiers in bacterial communities of urban stormwater best management practices (BMPs)
Sustaining Environmental Capital Initiative summary report
Employing an ecosystem services framework to deliver decision ready science
Carbon dioxide emissions and methane flux from forested wetland soils of the Great Dismal Swamp, USA
Valuation of the flood attenuation ecosystem service in Difficult Run, VA, USA
Estimating the societal benefits of carbon dioxide sequestration through peatland restoration
Terrestrial wetlands
A method to quantify and value floodplain sediment and nutrient retention ecosystem services
Floodplains provide critical ecosystem services to local and downstream communities by retaining floodwaters, sediments, and nutrients. The dynamic nature of floodplains is such that these areas can both accumulate sediment and nutrients through deposition, and export material downstream through erosion. Therefore, estimating floodplain sediment and nutrient retention should consider the net flux
Benefits of the fire mitigation ecosystem service in the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, Virginia, USA
Modeling watershed-scale impacts of stormwater management with traditional versus low impact development design
Non-USGS Publications**
**Disclaimer: The views expressed in Non-USGS publications are those of the author and do not represent the views of the USGS, Department of the Interior, or the U.S. Government.
Quantifying Floodplain Ecological Processes and Ecosystem Services in the Delaware River Watershed
Water-Quality Improvements Resulting from Suburban Stormwater Management Practices in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
Land Use Land Cover, 1998 - 2013, Clarksburg (Montgomery County, MD)
Science and Products
Ephemeral stream network extraction from lidar-derived elevation and topographic attributes in urban and forested landscapes
Lessons learned from 20 y of monitoring suburban development with distributed stormwater management in Clarksburg, Maryland, USA
The presence of denitrifiers in bacterial communities of urban stormwater best management practices (BMPs)
Sustaining Environmental Capital Initiative summary report
Employing an ecosystem services framework to deliver decision ready science
Carbon dioxide emissions and methane flux from forested wetland soils of the Great Dismal Swamp, USA
Valuation of the flood attenuation ecosystem service in Difficult Run, VA, USA
Estimating the societal benefits of carbon dioxide sequestration through peatland restoration
Terrestrial wetlands
A method to quantify and value floodplain sediment and nutrient retention ecosystem services
Floodplains provide critical ecosystem services to local and downstream communities by retaining floodwaters, sediments, and nutrients. The dynamic nature of floodplains is such that these areas can both accumulate sediment and nutrients through deposition, and export material downstream through erosion. Therefore, estimating floodplain sediment and nutrient retention should consider the net flux
Benefits of the fire mitigation ecosystem service in the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, Virginia, USA
Modeling watershed-scale impacts of stormwater management with traditional versus low impact development design
Non-USGS Publications**
**Disclaimer: The views expressed in Non-USGS publications are those of the author and do not represent the views of the USGS, Department of the Interior, or the U.S. Government.